Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:38:09.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on disjoint-occurrence inequalities for marked Poisson point processes

Part of: Stochastic processes Distribution theory - Probability Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

J. van den Berg
J. van den Berg*
Affiliation:
CWI
*
∗Postal address: CWI, Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For (marked) Poisson point processes we give, for increasing events, a new proof of the analog of the BK inequality. In contrast to other proofs, which use weak-convergence arguments, our proof is ‘direct' and requires no extra topological conditions on the events. Apart from some well-known properties of Poisson point processes, the proof is self-contained.

Keywords

DISJOINT OCCURRENCECONTINUUM PERCOLATIONPOISSON POINT PROCESSES

MSC classification

Primary: 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings 60G55: Point processes 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , September 1996 , pp. 420 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

van den Berg, J. and Fiebig, U. (1987) On a combinatorial conjecture concerning disjoint occurrences of events. Ann. Prob. 15, 354–374.Google Scholar
van den Berg, J. and Kesten, H. (1985) Inequalities with applications to percolation and reliability. J. Appl. Prob. 22, 556–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, C. and Grimmett, G. R. (1991) Exponential decay for subcritical contact and percolation processes. Ann. Prob. 19, 984–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (1988) An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Grimmett, G. R. (1989) Percolation. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meester, R. and Roy, R. (1994) Uniqueness of unbounded occupied and vacant components in Boolean models. Ann. Appl. Prob. 4, 933–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menshikov, M. V. and Sidorenko, A. F. (1987) Coincidence of critical points for Poisson percolation models. Theory Prob. Appl. 32, 603–606 (in Russian) (547-550 in translation).Google Scholar
Penrose, M. D. (1991) On a continuum percolation model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 23, 536–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, D. (1994) Butterflies. Preprint.Google Scholar
Roy, R. (1990) The RSW theorem and the equality of critical densities and the ‘dual’ critical densities for continuum percolation on 2. Ann. Prob. 18, 1563–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, R. and Sarkar, A. (1992) On some questions of Hartigan in cluster analysis: an application of BK inequality for continuum percolation. Preprint.Google Scholar
Sarkar, A. (1994) Some Problems of Continuum Percolation. PhD thesis, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar