Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:37:14.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Continuous-Time Ehrenfest Process in Term Structure Modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

A. Kaplun*
Affiliation:
TU Dortmund University
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 87, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, a finite-state mean-reverting model for the short rate, based on the continuous-time Ehrenfest process, will be examined. Two explicit pricing formulae for zero-coupon bonds will be derived in the general and special symmetric cases. Its limiting relationship to the Vasicek model will be examined with some numerical results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2010 

References

[1] Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[2] Bingham, N. H. (1991). Fluctuation theory for the Ehrenfest urn. Adv. Appl. Prob. 23, 598611.Google Scholar
[3] Brémaud, P. (1999). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Brigo, D. and Mercurio, F. (2005). Interest Rate Models - Theory and Practice. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[5] Bühlmann, H. (1994). Continuous and discrete models in finance, in particular for stochastic interest rates. Decisions Econom. Finance 17, 320.Google Scholar
[6] Delbaen, F. and Shirakawa, H. (2002). An interest rate model with upper and lower bounds. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 9, 191209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Gross, K. I. and Richards, D. St. P. (1989). Total positivity, spherical series, and hypergeometric functions of matrix argument. J. Approx. Theory 59, 224246.Google Scholar
[8] Karlin, S. and McGregor, J. (1965). Ehrenfest urn models. J. Appl. Prob. 2, 352376.Google Scholar
[9] Karlin, S. and Taylor, H. M. (1981). A Second Course in Stochastic Processes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[10] Koev, P. and Edelman, A. (2006). The efficient evaluation of the hypergeometric function of a matrix argument. Math. Comput. 75, 833846.Google Scholar
[11] Krafft, O. and Schaefer, M. (1993). Mean passage times for tridiagonal transition matrices and a two-parameter Ehrenfest urn model. J. Appl. Prob. 30, 964970.Google Scholar
[12] Lakner, P. (2006). Martingale measures for a class of right-continuous processes. Math. Finance 3, 4353.Google Scholar
[13] Okunev, J. and Tippett, M. (1989). Continuous-time stochastic calculus: a survey of applications in finance and accountancy. IMA J. Manag. Math. 2, 157171.Google Scholar
[14] Rogers, L. C. G. (1995). Which model for term-structure of interest rates should one use? In Mathematical Finance (IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 65), eds Davis, M. H. A. et al., Springer, New York, pp. 93116.Google Scholar
[15] Siegert, A. J. F. (1949). On the approach to statistical equilibrium. Phys. Rev. 76, 17081714.Google Scholar
[16] Sumita, U., Gotoh, J. and Jin, H. (2006). Numerical exploration of dynamic behavior of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes via Ehrenfest process approximation. J. Operat. Res. Soc. Japan 49, 256278.Google Scholar
[17] Szegö, G. (1983). Orthogonal Polynomials (Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. Publ. 23). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
[18] Takahashi, H. (2004). Ehrenfest model with large Jumps in finance. Physica D 189, 6169.Google Scholar
[19] Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterisation of the term structure. J. Financial Econom. 5, 177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Voit, M. (1996). Asymptotic distributions for the Ehrenfest urn and related random walks. J. Appl. Prob. 33, 340356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar