Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:23:52.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Reliability Bounds via Conditional Inequalities

Part of: Distribution theory - Probability Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

M. Xie  and
C. D. Lai
M. Xie*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
C. D. Lai*
Affiliation:
Massey University
*
∗Postal address: National University of Singapore, Singapore 0511
∗∗Postal address: Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we study an approximation of system reliability using one-step conditioning. It is shown that, without greatly increasing the computational complexity, the conditional method may be used instead of the usual minimal cut and minimal path bounds to obtain more accurate approximations and bounds. We also study the conditions under which the approximations are bounds on the reliability. Some further extensions are also presented.

Keywords

Reliability theoryreliability boundsconditional approximationassociation

MSC classification

Primary: 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings
Secondary: 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 104 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, A.N., Leon, R., and Proschan, F. (1980). Generalized association, with applications in multivariate statistics. Ann. Statist. 9, 168–176.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.E., and Proschan, F. (1981). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. To Begin With, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
Block, H.W., Costigan, T.M., and Sampson, A.R. (1993). Optimal second-order product probability bounds. J. Appl. Prob. 30, 675–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, F.Y., Chan, L.K., and Lin, G.D. (1988). On consecutive-k-out-of-n:F systems. European J. Operat. Res. 36, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, D.T., and Niu, S.C. (1981). Reliability of consecutive-k-out-of-n systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-30, 87–89.Google Scholar
Derman, C., Lieberman, G.J., and Ross, S.M. (1982). On the consecutive k-out-of-n system. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-31, 57–63.Google Scholar
Du, D.Z., and Hwang, F.K. (1986). Optimal consecutive-2-out-of-n systems. Math. Operat. Res. 11, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esary, J.D., Proschan, F., and Walkup, D.W. (1967). Association of random variables, with applications. Ann. Math. Statist. 44, 1466–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, J.C. (1993). Poisson convergence in reliability of large linearly connected system as related to coin tossing. Statist. Sinica 3, 261–275.Google Scholar
Galambos, J. (1994). Bonferroni-type inequalities in statistics: A survey. J. Appl. Statist. Sci. 1, 195–209. (See also the corrigendum in No.1, Vol 2 (1995) of the same journal.)Google Scholar
Galambos, J., and Xu, J. (1990). A new method for generating Bonferroni-type inequalities. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 107, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaz, J. (1990). A comparison of improved Bonferroni-type and product-type inequalities in presence of dependence. In Topics in Statistical Dependence. (IMS Lecture Notes 16.) pp. 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbole, A. (1993). Approximating reliabilities of m-consecutive-k-out-of-n failure system. Statistica Sinica 2, 321–327.Google Scholar
Hoppe, F.M., and Seneta, E. (1990). Bonferroni-type inequalities and the methods of indicators and polynomials. Adv. Appl. Prob. 22, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jogdeo, K. (1982). Dependence, concepts of. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Vol 2. pp. 324–334.Google Scholar
Kounias, S., and Sotirakoglou, K. (1989). Bonferroni bounds revisited. J. Appl. Prob. 26, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwerel, S.M. (1975a). Most stringent bounds on aggregated probabilities of partially specified dependent probability systems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 70, 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwerel, S.M. (1975b). Bounds on the probability of union and intersection of m events. Adv. Appl. Prob. 7, 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R.B. (1992). On measures of association as measures of positive dependence. Statist. Prob. Lett. 14, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastavridis, S.G. (1990). m-consecutive-k-out-of-n: F systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 39, 386–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastavridis, S.G., and Koutras, M.V. (1993). Bounds for reliability of consecutive-k-out-of-n: F systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 42, 155–160.Google Scholar
Salvia, A.A. (1982). Simple inequalities for consecutive k-out-of-n networks. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-31, 450.Google Scholar
Schwager, S.J. (1984). Bonferroni sometimes loses. Amer. Statistician 38, 192–196.Google Scholar
Sibuya, M. (1991). Bonferroni-type inequalities; Chebyshev-type inequalities for the distributions on [o,n]. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 43, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, T.H. (1994). Generalized Bonferroni inequalities. J. Appl. Prob. 31, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar