Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:52:29.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How much market making does a market need?

Part of: Time-dependent statistical mechanics (dynamic and nonequilibrium) Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

Vít Peržina  and
Jan M. Swart
Vít Peržina*
Affiliation:
Charles University
Jan M. Swart*
Affiliation:
The Czech Academy of Sciences
*
* Postal address: Matematicko-fyzikální fakulta, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Praha 2, Czech Republic. Email address: [email protected]
** Postal address: The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Pod vodárenskou věží 4, 182 08 Praha 8, Czech Republic. Email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider a simple model for the evolution of a limit order book in which limit orders of unit size arrive according to independent Poisson processes. The frequencies of buy limit orders below a given price level, respectively sell limit orders above a given level, are described by fixed demand and supply functions. Buy (respectively, sell) limit orders that arrive above (respectively, below) the current ask (respectively, bid) price are converted into market orders. There is no cancellation of limit orders. This model has been independently reinvented by several authors, including Stigler (1964), and Luckock (2003), who calculated the equilibrium distribution of the bid and ask prices. We extend the model by introducing market makers that simultaneously place both a buy and sell limit order at the current bid and ask price. We show that introducing market makers reduces the spread, which in the original model was unrealistically large. In particular, we calculate the exact rate at which market makers need to place orders in order to close the spread completely. If this rate is exceeded, we show that the price settles at a random level that, in general, does not correspond to the Walrasian equilibrium price.

Keywords

Continuous double auctionlimit order bookStigler‒Luckock modelrank-based Markov chain

MSC classification

Primary: 82C27: Dynamic critical phenomena
Secondary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory 82C26: Dynamic and nonequilibrium phase transitions (general) 60K25: Queueing theory
Type
Applied Probability Trust Lecture
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 667 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Barabási, A.-L. (2005). The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435, 207–211.Google Scholar
[2]Bak, P. and Sneppen, K. (1993). Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4083–4086.Google Scholar
[3]Chakraborti, A., Muni Toke, I., Patriarca, M. and Abergel, F. (2011). Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models. Quant. Finance 11, 1013–1041.Google Scholar
[4]Cont, R., Stoikov, S. and Talreja, R. (2010). A stochastic model for order book dynamics. Operat. Res. 58, 549–563.Google Scholar
[5]Formentin, M. and Swart, J. M. (2016). The limiting shape of a full mailbox. ALEA Latin Amer. J. Prob. Math. Statist. 13, 1151–1164.Google Scholar
[6]Gabrielli, A. and Caldarelli, G. (2009). Invasion percolation and the time scaling behavior of a queuing model of human dynamics. J. Statist. Mech. 2009, P02046.Google Scholar
[7]Kelly, F. and Yudovina, E. (2018). A Markov model of a limit order book: thresholds, recurrence, and trading strategies. Math. Operat. Res. 43, 181–203.Google Scholar
[8]Luckock, H. (2003). A steady-state model of the continuous double auction. Quant. Finance 3, 385–404.Google Scholar
[9]Maslov, S. (2000). Simple model of a limit order-driven market. Physica A 278, 571–578.Google Scholar
[10]Meester, R. and Sarkar, A. (2012). Rigorous self-organised criticality in the modified Bak-Sneppen model. J. Statist. Phys. 149, 964–968.Google Scholar
[11]Plačková, J. (2011). Shluky volatility a dynamika poptávky a nabídky. Masters Thesis, Charles University. (In Czech.)Google Scholar
[12]Scalas, E., Rapallo, F. and Radivojević, T. (2017). Low-traffic limit and first-passage times for a simple model of the continuous double auction. Physica A 485, 61–72.Google Scholar
[13]Slanina, F. (2014). Essentials of Econophysics Modelling. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[14]Šmíd, M. (2012). Probabilistic properties of the continuous double auction. Kybernetika 48, 50–82.Google Scholar
[15]Stigler, G. J. (1964). Public regulation of the securities markets. J. Business 37, 117–142.Google Scholar
[16]Swart, J. M. (2017). A simple rank-based Markov chain with self-organized criticality. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 23, 87–102.Google Scholar
[17]Swart, J. M. (2018). Rigorous results for the Stigler-Luckock model for the evolution of an order book. Ann. Appl. Prob. 28, 1491–1535.Google Scholar
[18]Walras, L. (1874). Éléments d'Économie politique pure; ou, Théorie de la Richesse Sociale. Corbaz, Lausanne. (In French.)Google Scholar
[19]Yudovina, E. (2012). A simple model of a limit order book. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.7017v2.Google Scholar
[20]Yudovina, E. (2012). Collaborating queues: large service network and a limit order book. Doctoral thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar