Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:55:04.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of the method of whole wheat inclusion on performance and caecal microbiota profile of broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2019

Yashpal Singh ,
Abdul Latiff Molan  and
Velmurugu Ravindran
Yashpal Singh
Affiliation:
Monogastric Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
Abdul Latiff Molan
Affiliation:
Monogastric Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
Velmurugu Ravindran*
Affiliation:
Monogastric Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study was conducted to investigate the effect of method of whole wheat inclusion on performance and caecal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis was used to characterise the microbiota by using genus-specific probes. Three treatments, namely, ground wheat (GW) or 200 g/kg whole wheat (WW) replacing GW before or after pelleting were evaluated. A total of 144, one-day-old male broilers (Ross 308) were allocated to 18 cages (eight broilers per cage) based on body weight and six cages were randomly assigned to each treatment. The diets were offered ad libitum from day 11 to 35 post-hatch. The WW fed birds, regardless of the method of inclusion, resulted in poorer weight gain (P < 0.05) and reduced feed intake (P < 0.001), but a similar feed per gain (P > 0.05) compared to those fed the GW diet. The WW diet, regardless to the method of inclusion, had no effect (P > 0.05) on the populations of Lactobacillus and Bacteroides spp. compared with the GW diet. The Bifidobacterium spp. population was higher (P < 0.05) in birds fed the GW diet compared with WW feeding, regardless of the method of inclusion. A reduction (P < 0.05) in the numbers of pathogenic Clostridium and Campylobacter spp. were observed in caecal samples from birds fed WW diets, regardless of method of inclusion, compared with those fed the GW diet, which was attributed to increased gizzard activity. Birds fed WW diets, regardless to the method of inclusion, showed a reduction in gizzard pH (P < 0.05), microbial gas production (P < 0.05), and an increase in gizzard weight (P < 0.05) relative to the GW treatment. The results indicated that the gizzard has an important function as a barrier organ, one that prevents pathogenic bacteria from entering the distal digestive tract.

Keywords

Broilerscaecamicrobiotawhole wheat
Type
Original Research
Information
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition , Volume 7 , 2019 , e4
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Ltd. 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

2

Present address: Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Science, Gurur Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University (GADVASU), Ludhiana, Punjab, India 141004

3

Present address: University of Diyala, Baqubah, Iraq

References

Abdollahi, M.R., Zaefarian, F. and Ravindran, V. (2018) Feed intake response of broilers: Impact of feed processing. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 237: 154–165Google Scholar
Amerah, A.M. and Ravindran, V. (2008) Influence of method of whole-wheat feeding on the performance, digestive tract development and carcass traits of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 147: 326–339.Google Scholar
Apajalahti, J., Kuttunen, A. and Graham, H. (2004) Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 60: 223–232.Google Scholar
Bjerrum, L., Pedersen, K. and Engberg, R. M. (2005) The influence of whole wheat feeding on salmonella infection and gut flora composition in broilers. Avian Disease, 49: 9–15.Google Scholar
Briozzo, J., de Lagarde, E.A., Chirife, J. and Parada, J.L. (1986) Effect of water activity and pH on growth and toxin production by Clostridium botulinum type G. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 51: 844–848.Google Scholar
Choct, M., Hughes, R.J., Wang, J., Bedford, M.R., Morgan, A.J. and Annison, G. (1996) Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the antinutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens. British Poultry Science, 37: 609–621.Google Scholar
Clarke, T.B., Davis, K.M., Lysenko, E.S., Zhou, A.Y., Yu, Y, and Weiser, J.N. (2010) Recognition of peptidoglycan from the microbiota by Nod1 enhances systemic innate immunity. Nature Medicine, 16: 228–231.Google Scholar
Dibner, J.J. and Richard, J.D. (2005) Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poultry Science, 84: 634–643.Google Scholar
Doyle, M.P. and Roman, D.J. (1981) Growth and Survival of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni as a Function of Temperature and pH. Journal of Food Protection, 44: 596–601.Google Scholar
Engberg, R.M., Hedemann, M.S., Steenfeldt, S. and Jensen, B.B. (2004) The influence of whole wheat and xylanase on broiler performance and microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract. Poultry Science, 83: 925–938.Google Scholar
Gabriel, I., Mallet, S. and Leconte, M. (2003) Differences in the digestive tract characteristics of broiler chickens fed on complete pelleted feed or on whole wheat added to pelleted protein concentrate. British Poultry Science, 44: 283–290.Google Scholar
Geier, M. S., Torok, V.A., Allison, G.E., Ophel-Keller, K. and Hughes, R.J. (2009) Indigestible carbohydrates alter the intestinal microbiota but do not influence the performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 106: 1540–1548.Google Scholar
Hetland, H. and Svihus, B. (2001) Effect of oat hulls on performance, gut capacity and feed passage time in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 42: 354–361.Google Scholar
Hetland, H., Svihus, B. and Krogdahl, A. (2003) Effects of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. British Poultry Science, 44: 275–282.Google Scholar
Hooper, L.V. (2004) Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development. Trends in Microbiology, 12:129–134.Google Scholar
Langhout, D.J., Schutte, J.B., De Jong, J., Sloetjes, H., Verstegen, M.W. and Tamminga, S. (2000) Effect of viscosity on digestion of nutrients in conventional and germ-free chicks. Britsih Journal of Nutrition, 83: 533–540.Google Scholar
Langhout, D.J., Schutte, J.B., Van Leeuw, E.P., Wiebenga, J. and Tamminga, S. (1999) Effect of dietary high- and low methylated citrus pectin on the activity of the ileal microbiota and morphology of the small intestinal wall of broiler chicks. British Poultry Science, 40: 340–347.Google Scholar
Laubach, J. (2006) Case studies: Methane capture and biogas projects at poultry farms in Moldova and Georgia. Project development and methodological issues, Climate Technology Initiative, Federal Ministry for the Environment, and Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety. http://www.ecologic-events.de/cti/documents/9_laubach.pdf January, 2012.Google Scholar
Mathew, A.G. (2001) Nutritional influence on gut microbiology and enteric diseases. In: Science and Technology in the Feed Industry. Proceedings of Alltech's 17th Annual Symposium: a time for answer. Lyons, T.P. and Jacques, K.A. (Eds). Alltech, UK, pp: 49–63.Google Scholar
Molan, A.L., Liu, Z. and Tiwari, R. (2010) The ability of green tea to positively modulate key markers of gastrointestinal function in rats. Phytotherapy Research, 24: 1614–1619.Google Scholar
Moore, S. (1999) Food breakdown in an avian herbivore: who needs teeth? Australian Journal of Zoology, 47: 625–632.Google Scholar
Oosterom, J. (1991) Epidemiological studies and proposed preventive measures in the fight against human salmonellosis. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 12:41–52.Google Scholar
Owens, B., Tucker, L., Collins, M.A. and McCracken, K.J. (2008) Effects of different feed additives alone or in combination on broiler performance, gut microbiota and ileal histology. British Poultry Science, 49:202–212.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, F.G. and Sefton, A.E. (1978) Feed texture and light treatment effects on the performance of chicken broilers. Poultry Science, 57: 408–416.Google Scholar
Rasschaert, G., Houf, K., Godard, C., Wildernauwe, C., Pastuszczak- Frak, M. and De Zutter, L. (2008) Contamination of carcasses with Salmonella during poultry slaughter. Journal of Food Protection, 71: 146–152.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V., Wu, Y.B., Thomas, D.G. and Morel, P.C.H. (2006) Influence of whole wheat feeding on the development of digestive organs and performance of broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57: 21–16.Google Scholar
Richards, M.P. (2003) Genetic regulation of feed intake and energy balance in poultry. Poultry Science, 82: 907–916.Google Scholar
Rose, S.P., Fielden, M., Foote, W.R. and Gardin, P. (1995) Sequential feeding of whole wheat to growing broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 36: 97–111.Google Scholar
Santos, F.B.O., Sheldon, B.W., Santos, A.A. and Ferket, P.R. (2008) Influence of housing system, grain type, and particle size on Salmonella colonization and shedding of broilers fed triticale or corn-soybean meal diets. Poultry Science, 87: 405–420.Google Scholar
Santos, F.B.O., Sheldon, B.W., Santos, A.A., Ferket, P.R., Lee, M.D., Petroso, A. and Smith, D. (2007) Determination of ileum microbial diversity of broilers fed triticale-or corn-based diets and colonized by Salmonella. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16: 563–573.Google Scholar
SAS. (2004) SAS/STAT® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Singh, Y., Amerah, A. M. and Ravindran, V. (2014a) Whole grain feeding: Methodologies and effects on performance, digestive tract development and nutrient utilisation of poultry. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 190: 1–18Google Scholar
Singh, Y., Ravindran, V., Wester, T. J., Molan, A. L. and Ravindran, G. (2014b) Influence of pre-pelleting inclusion of whole corn on performance, nutrient utilisation, digestive tract measurements, and cecal microbiota of young broilers. Poultry Science, 93: 3073–3082Google Scholar
Skillman, L.C., Bajsa, O., Ho, L., Santhanam, B., Kumar, M. and Ho, G. (2009) Influence of high gas production during thermophilic anaerobic digestion in pilot-scale and lab-scale reactors on survival of the thermotolerant pathogens Clostridium perfringens and Campylobacter jejuni in piggery wastewater. Water Research, 43: 3281–3291.Google Scholar
Svihus, B., Hetland, H., Choct, M. and Sundby, F. (2002) Passage rate through the anterior digestive tract of broiler chickens fed on diets with ground and whole wheat. British Poultry Science, 43: 662–668.Google Scholar
Svihus, B., Juvik, E., Hetland, H. and Krogdahl, Å. (2004) Causes for improvement in nutritive value of broiler chicken diets with whole wheat instead of ground wheat. British Poultry Science, 45: 55–60.Google Scholar
Truong, H.H., Moss, A.F., Liu, S.Y. and Selle, P.H. (2017) Pre- and post-pellet whole grain inclusions enhance feed conversion efficiency, energy utilisation and gut integrity in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 224: 115–123.Google Scholar
Van Immerseel, F., Buck, J.D., Pasmans, F., Huyghebaert, G., Haesebrouck, F. and Ducatelle, R. (2004) Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health. Avian Pathology, 33: 537–549.Google Scholar
Willing, B.P., Russell, S.L. and Finlay, B.B. (2011) Shifting the balance: antibiotic effects on host–microbiota mutualism. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9: 233–243.Google Scholar
Wu, Y.B. and Ravindran, V. (2004) Influence of whole wheat inclusion and xylanase supplementation on the performance, digestive tract measurements and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 116: 129–139.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Iji, P.A. and Choct, M. (2009) Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World's Poultry Science Journal, 65, 97–114.Google Scholar
Zhu, X.Y. and Joerger, R.D. (2003) Composition of microbiota in content and mucus from cecae of broiler chickens as measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization with group-specific, 16s RNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Poultry Science, 82: 1242–1249.Google Scholar