Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:17:22.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of soybean bioactive peptides on performance, foot pad lesions and carcass characteristics in broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

M. R. Abdollahi*
Affiliation:
Monogastric Research Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
F. Zaefarian
Affiliation:
Monogastric Research Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
Y. Gu
Affiliation:
Chengdu Mytech Biotech Co. Ltd., Industrial park, Jitian Town, Shuangliu County, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
W. Xiao
Affiliation:
Chengdu Mytech Biotech Co. Ltd., Industrial park, Jitian Town, Shuangliu County, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
J. Jia
Affiliation:
Chengdu Mytech Biotech Co. Ltd., Industrial park, Jitian Town, Shuangliu County, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
V. Ravindran
Affiliation:
Monogastric Research Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author:[email protected]

Summary

The influence of different inclusion levels of a biologically active peptide derived from soybeans by enzymatic hydrolysis, on growth performance, foot pad lesions and carcass characteristics in broilers were examined in this study. Starter (1 to 21 d) and finisher (22 to 42 d) diets, based on maize and soybean meal, were subjected to seven inclusion levels of a commercial soybean bioactive peptide (SBP) product (Fortide, Chengdu Mytech Biotech Co. Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan, China) at 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 g/kg of diet. All diets were equivalent in respect of energy density, digestible amino acids and other nutrients. A total of 840, one-day-old male broilers (Ross 308) were allocated to 42 pens (20 birds/pen), which were randomly assigned to seven dietary treatments. During the starter period, there was no significant effect of SBP on weight gain and feed intake of the birds. However, a significant (P < 0.05) effect of SBP was observed for the feed conversion ratio (FCR), with SBP inclusion at 3.0 g/kg and above showing lower (P < 0.05) FCR values compared to the diet with no SBP. No effect of SBP was observed for weight gain and feed intake over the whole trial period. However, SBP inclusion tended (P = 0.06) to influence the FCR of birds. Increasing SBP inclusion level resulted in gradual decrease in FCR values, with SBP inclusion at 5.0 and 6.0 g/kg showing lower FCR values compared to the diet with no SBP. Overall, the present study suggests that dietary supplementation of SBP in broiler diets has the potential to improve FCR and to be used as a novel functional protein in poultry diets.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Ltd. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdollahi, M.R., Zaefarian, F., Gu, Y., Xiao, W., Jia, J. and Ravindran, V. (2017) Influence of soybean bioactive peptides on growth performance, nutrient utilisation, digestive tract development and intestinal histology in broilers. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition, 5: e7. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alashi, A.M., Blanchard, C.L., Mailer, R.J. and Agboola, S.O. (2013) Technological and bioactive functionalities of canola meal proteins and hydrolysates. Food Reviews International, 29: 231260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, D.A., Catignani, G.L. and Swaisgood, H.E. (2003) Biodefense properties of milk: the role of antimicrobial proteins and peptides. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 9: 12391256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dziuba, J., Minkiewicz, P. and Nalecz, D. (1999) Biologically active peptides from plant and animal proteins. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 8: 316.Google Scholar
Feng, J., Liu, X., Xu, Z.R., Wang, Y.Z. and Liu, J.X. (2007) Effects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. Poultry Science, 86: 11491154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frikha, M., Mirzaie, S., Irandoust, H., Mohiti-Asli, M., Chetrit, C. and Mateos, G.G. (2011) Growth response of broilers to lysine levels and hydrolyzed porcine digestive mucosa (Palbio) inclusion in diet from 1 to 21 d of age. Poultry Science 90 (E-Suppl. 1): 151.Google Scholar
Frikha, M., Mohiti-Asli, M., Chetrit, C. and Mateos, G.G. (2014) Hydrolyzed porcine mucosa in broiler diets: Effects on growth performance, nutrient retention, and histomorphology of the small intestine. Poultry Science, 93: 400411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, M.L. and Wood, D. (1989) Transport of peptides across the gastrointestinal tract. Biochemical Society Transactions, 17: 934937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, E.R., Wong, E.A. and Webb, K.E. Jr (2008) Peptide absorption and utilization: implications for animal nutrition and health. Animal Science, 86: 21352155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, R.E. and Sahl, H.G. (2006) Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nature Biotechnology, 24: 15511557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, R., Girgih, A.T., Malomo, S.A., Ju, X. and Aluko, R.E. (2013) Antioxidant activities of enzymatic rapeseed protein hydrolysates and the membrane ultrafiltration fractions. Journal of Functional Foods, 5: 219227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, y., Wu, Z., Dai, Z.,Wang, G. and Wu, G. (2017) Protein hydrolysates in animal nutrition: Industrial production, bioactive peptides, and functional significance. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 8: 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamnerdpetch, C., Weiss, M., Kasper, C. and Scheper, T. (2007) An improvement of potato pulp protein hydrolyzation process by the combination of protease enzyme systems. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 40: 508514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimzadeh, S., Rezaei, M. and Teimouri Yansari, A. (2016) Effects of canola bioactive peptides on performance, digestive enzyme activities, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology and gut microflora in broiler chickens. Poultry Science Journal, 4: 2736.Google Scholar
Kiers, J.L., Meijer, J.C., Nout, M.J.R., Rombouts, F.M., Nabuurs, M.J.A. and Van der Meulen, J. (2003) Effect of fermented soya beans on diarrhoea and feed efficiency in weaned piglets. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95: 545552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, J., Zeng, Y., Hou, W., Zhang, S., Li, L., Luo, X., Xi, W., Chen, Z. and Xiang, M. (2012) The soybean peptide aglycin regulates glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetic mice via IR/IRS1 pathway. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 23: 1449–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, B.B., Mendes, A.A., Martins, M R.F.B., Almeida Paz, I.C.L., Fernandes, B.C.S. and Bresne, C. (2011) Effect of genotype and gender on performance and footpad dermatitis in broilers. http://en.engormix.com/MA-poultry-industry/health/articles/effect-genotype-gender-performance-t1932/165-p0.htm.Google Scholar
Mateos, G.G., Mohiti-Asli, M., Borda, E., Mirzaie, S. and Frikha, M. (2014) Effect of inclusion of porcine mucosa hydrolysate in diets varying in lysine content on growth performance and ileal histomorphology of broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 187: 5360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, W.I., Lynch, G.W., Williamson, P. and Cowieson, A.J. (2013) The oral administration of meat and bone meal-derived protein fractions improved the performance of young broiler chicks. Animal Production Science, 53: 369377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagaraj, M., Wilson, C.A.P., Hess, J.B. and Bilgili, S.F. (2007) Effect of high-protein and all-vegetable diets on the incidence and severity of pododermatitis in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16: 304312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlanto-Leppälä, A. (2001) Bioactive peptides derived from bovine proteins: opioid and ace-inhibitory peptides. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 11: 347356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS. (2004) SAS® Qualification Tools User's Guide. Version 9.1.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Singh, B.P., Vij, S. and Hati, S. (2014) Functional significance of bioactive peptides derived from soybean. Peptides, 54: 171179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, E.M. and Fairchild, B.D. (2010) Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science 89: 20432051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, R.J., Oleszek, W., Franz, C., Hahn, I., Baser, K.H.C., Mathe, A. and Teichmann, K. (2010) Dietary plant bioactives for poultry health and productivity. British Poultry Science, 51: 461487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, F.Q. (2005) Effects of bioactive peptide as feed additive on the performance, immune function and protein metabolism rate in broiler chicken. Master's Thesis, China Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Wang, J.P., Liua, N., Songa, M.Y., Qin, C.L. and Ma, C.S. (2011) Effect of enzymolytic soybean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune function of growing broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 169: 224229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynstra, R.J. (1986) Expanding the use of soybeans. Champaign: College of Agriculture, University of Illinois at Urbana. pp. 20.Google Scholar
Yang, Z., Gu, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, L. and Xu, B. (2009) Small molecule hydrogels based on a class of anti-inflammatory agents. Chemical Communications, 2: 208209.Google Scholar