Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:54:16.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbohydrase enzymes improve performance of broilers fed both nutritionally adequate and marginal wheat-based diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2017

D. Wu
Affiliation:
School of Rural and Environmental Science, University of New England, Armidale 2351, NSW, Australia
M. Choct
Affiliation:
Poultry Cooperative Research Centre, Armidale 2351, NSW, Australia
S. B. Wu
Affiliation:
School of Rural and Environmental Science, University of New England, Armidale 2351, NSW, Australia
Y. G. Liu
Affiliation:
Adisseo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, 30 Hill Street, Singapore
R. A. Swick*
Affiliation:
School of Rural and Environmental Science, University of New England, Armidale 2351, NSW, Australia
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]

Summary

A study was conducted to examine the effects of a multi-carbohydrase enzyme complex on the nutritive value of wheat in diets differing in nutrient density. It was hypothesised that response to enzyme inclusion would be greater in diets with lower nutrient density. The study was conducted using 1008 Ross 308 male broiler chicks (four treatments with seven replicate pens of 36 chicks). A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was employed. Factors were adequate or low nutrient density with or without enzyme supplementation. The wheat-soybean meal based positive control (PC) diet was formulated to be nutritionally adequate in energy and digestible amino acids according to local industry recommendations. A negative control (NC) was formulated to have 80 kcal/kg less ME and 1.5% less digestible amino acids as compared to the PC. A multi-carbohydrase complex containing 19 carbohydrase activities derived from Penicillium funiculosum was added in both the PC and NC diets (Rovabio® Excel LC, Adisseo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd., Singapore). Birds fed the NC had 3.7 points (P < 0.05) poorer FCR than the PC. Across the diet type, enzyme supplementation increased body weight by 3.2% (P < 0.05) and improved FCR by 5.2 points (P < 0.01). There was no nutrient density x enzyme interaction (P > 0.05), indicating that performance improvement was independent of nutrient density. Apparent ileal digestibility of crude protein followed a similar trend, showing a 4.9% enhancement (P < 0.01) with the inclusion of the enzyme product in either diet. Enzyme supplementation reduced ileal viscosity by 39.0% (P < 0.05). It was concluded that multi-carbohydrase could overcome the negative effect in broiler performance brought by nutrient reduction, however, there was no indication that nutrient density affected bird response to supplementation of multi-carbohydrase.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Ltd. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angkanaporn, K., Choct, M., Bryden, W. L., Annison, E. F. and Annison, G. (1994). Effects of wheat pentosans on endogenous amino-acid losses in chickens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 66: 399404.Google Scholar
Annison, G. (1992). Commercial enzyme supplementation of wheat-based diets raises ileal glycanase activities and improves apparent metabolisable energy, starch and pentosan digestibilities in broiler-chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 38: 105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, M. R. and Classen, H. L. (1992). Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is effected through changes in the carbohydrate-composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved growth-rate and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 12: 560569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choct, M., Dersjant-Li, Y., McLeish, J. and Peisker, M. (2010). Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: a review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 23: 13861398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choct, M. H. R., Trimble, R.P. and Annison, G. (1994). The use of enzymes in low-AME wheat broiler diets: effects on bird performance and gut viscosity. Proceedings of the 6 th Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, pp. 8387.Google Scholar
Choct, M., Kocher, A., Waters, D. L. E., Pettersson, D. and Ross, G. (2004). A comparison of three xylanases on the nutritive value of two wheats for broiler chickens. British Journal of Nutrition, 92: 5361.Google Scholar
Cowieson, A. J. (2010). Strategic Selection of Exogenous Enzymes for Corn/soy-based Poultry Diets. Journal of Poultry Science, 47: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowieson, A. J. and Ravindrani, V. (2008). Effect of exogenous enzymes in maize-based diets varying in nutrient density for young broilers: growth performance and digestibility of energy, minerals and amino acids. British Poultry Science, 49: 3744.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. D., Pesti, G. M. and Foster, E. H. (1998). A comparison of nitrogen values obtained utilizing the Kjeldahl nitrogen and Dumas combustion methodologies (Leco CNS 2000) on samples typical of an animal nutrition analytical laboratory. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 73: 2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, K. E. B. (1997). Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 67: 319338.Google Scholar
Kocher, A., Choct, M., Ross, G., Broz, J. and Chung, T. K. (2003). Effects of enzyme combinations on apparent metabolisable energy of corn-soybean meal-based diets in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12: 275283.Google Scholar
Neto, R. M., Cozannet, P., and Preynat, A. (2015). Effect of the addtion of a carbohydrase complex on performance ad carcass yield of broiler chickens fed wheat-based diets. Proceedings of the 20th European Symposium on Poultry Conference, Prague, pp. 339341.Google Scholar
Neto, R. M., Cozannet, P., Rouffineau, F., and Preynat, A. (2015). Effet of a carbohydrase complex in feeds with different metablolisable energy and available amino acids levles for broilers reared under a hot climate condition. Proceedings of the 20th European Symposium on Poultry Conference, Prague, pp. 336338.Google Scholar
Short, F. J., Gorton, P., Wiseman, J. and Boorman, K. N. (1996). Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 59: 215221.Google Scholar
Slominski, B. A. and Campbell, L. D. (1990). Nonstarch polysaccharides of canola-meal - quantification, digestibility in poultry and potential benefit of dietary enzyme supplementation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 53: 175184.Google Scholar
Spratt, R. S., McBride, B. W., Bayley, H. S. and Leeson, S. (1990). Energy-metabolism of broiler breeder hens .2. contribution of tissues to total heat-production in fed and fasted hens. Poultry Science, 69: 13481356.Google Scholar
Theander, O., and Westerlund, E. (1993). Determination of individual components of dietary fiber. In Spiller, A. G. (Ed.), Dietary Fiber in Human Nutrition (2nd ed., pp. 7798). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Theander, O., Westerlund, E., Aman, P. and Graham, H. (1989). Plant-cell walls and monogastric diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 23: 205225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, J., Nicol, N. T. and Norton, G. (2000). Relationship between apparent metabolisable (AME) values and in vivo/in vitro starch digestibility of wheat for broilers. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 56: 305318.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Jiang, Z., Lv, D. and Wang, T. (2009). Improved energy-utilizing efficiency by enzyme preparation supplement in broiler diets with different metabolisable energy levels. Poultry Science, 88: 316322.Google Scholar