No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Western culture romanticizes wildness even as it fears the destruction of our humanity by all that is bestial, savage and unconstrained. Identity is constructed as a supposedly pure, bounded and sovereign force, constantly fascinated and repelled by its animal others.
The consequences of the church’s investment in this modern humanism are disparate, but united by a strange colonial logic, according to which the savage and the unnatural must be domesticated and incorporated into an empire of light. In the labelling of non-heterosexuals as ‘inhuman’ or ‘bestial’, complex links between the rhetoric of empire and resistance to that rhetoric are exposed. Appeals to African authenticity and liberal universalism are contextualized in postcolonial debates about securing human identity, debates in which the human/animal boundary becomes a key site of struggle.
This paper asks what the church looks like if our obsession with a pure identity of the (Western or African) human is challenged in the context of debates about sexuality within the Anglican Communion. It is argued that the dynamic of Christian revelation works to throw such categories into confusion, to release liberating encounters with the ‘inhuman’ others within and beyond our invented boundaries. An inherently plural, multilingual and differentiated process of Christian community is proposed.
Lecturer in Philosophy, Department of Theology and Religious Studies, Liverpool Hope University, UK.
2. Griffiths, Jay, Wild: An Elemental Journey (London: Hamish Hamilton, 2007), p. 1.Google Scholar
3. For examples, see also Simon Barnes, How to be Wild (London: Short, 2007) and Macfarlane, Robert,The Wild Places (London: Granta, 2007).Google Scholar
4. Griffiths, Wild, p. 41.Google Scholar
5. Groves, Philip (ed.), The Anglican Communion and Homosexuality (London: SPCK, 2008), p. 179.Google Scholar
6. Groves, The Anglican Communion, pp. 191–93.Google Scholar
7. Radner, Ephraim and Turner, Philip, The Fate of Communion: The Agony of Anglicanism and the Future of a Global Church (Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, 2006).Google Scholar
8. Shakespeare, Steven, ‘The Paradox of the Inclusive Church. Can Ecclesiology Live with Questions?’, in Clague, Julie, Hoose, Bernard and Mannion, Gerard (eds.), Moral Theology for the Twenty-First Century: Essays in Celebration of Kevin Kelly (London: T&T Clark, 2008), pp.192–203.Google Scholar
9. See Althaus-Reid, Marcella, Indecent Theology: Theological Perversions in Sex, Gender and Politics (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge (London: Penguin, 1998), p. 140.Google Scholar
11. Davies, Tony, Humanism (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 132.Google Scholar
12. Derrida, Jacques, The Animal That Therefore I Am (New York: Fordham, 2008), p. 32.Google Scholar
13. See Wolfe, Cary, Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species and Posthumanist Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
14. Quoted in Hoad, Neville, African Intimacies: Race, Homosexuality and Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007), p. xi.Google Scholar
15. Hoad, African Intimacies, p. xiv.Google Scholar
16. Lambeth Conference 1998 Archives. The Lambeth Conference Official Website, http://www.lambethconference.org/1998/news/lc098.cfmGoogle Scholar
17. The Listening Process: Church of Uganda Position Paper on Scripture, Authority, and Human Sexuality May 2005. The Anglican Communion Official Website, http://www.anglicancommunion.org/listening/world/docs/doc6.cfmGoogle Scholar
18. Ward, Kevin, ‘Same-sex Relationships in Africa and the Debate on Homosexuality in East African Anglicanism’, Anglican Theological Review 84.1 (2002), pp. 81–111 (108).Google Scholar
19. The Listening Process: Reports from the Provinces — The Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), http://www.anglicancommunion.org/listening/reports/nigeria.cfmGoogle Scholar
20. Akinola, Peter , ‘Why I object to Homosexuality’, Church Times, July 4, 2003.Google Scholar
21. Huckabee, Mike, interview with Steven Waldman and Dan Gilgoff on beliefnet, http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Politics/2008/01/Mike-Huckabee-The-Lord-Truly-Gave-Me-Wisdom.aspx?p=2Google Scholar
22. Onuoha, David, ‘The Absurdity of Same Sex Union’. The Church of Nigeria website, http://www.anglican-nig.org/smsexun_bponuoha.htmGoogle Scholar
23. Hoad, African Intimacies, p. 67.Google Scholar
24. Patterson, Charles, Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust (New York: Lantern, 2002), p. 34.Google Scholar
25. Patterson, Eternal Treblinka, p. 35.Google Scholar
26. Patterson, Eternal Treblinka, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
27. Patterson, Eternal Treblinka, p. 29.Google Scholar
28. Patterson, Eternal Treblinka, p. 30.Google Scholar
29. Patterson, Eternal Treblinka, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
30. Heise, Ursula K., ‘From Extinction to Electronics: Dead Frogs, Live Dinosaurs and Electric Sheep’, in Wolfe, C. (ed.), Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), pp.59–81.Google Scholar
31. Doyle, Arthur C., The Lost World (London: Penguin, 2007).Google Scholar
32. Conan Doyle, The Lost World, p. 124.Google Scholar
33. Conan Doyle, The Lost World, p. 99.Google Scholar
34. Conan Doyle, The Lost World, p. 220.Google Scholar
35. Ward, ‘Same-sex relationships in Africa’, p. 90.Google Scholar
36. Hoad, African Intimacies, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
37. Hoad, African Intimacies, p. 58.Google Scholar
38. Hoad, African Intimacies, p. 49.Google Scholar
39. Keller, Catherine, Nausner, Michael and Rivera, Mayra (eds.), Postcolonial Theologies: Divinity and Empire (St Louis: Chalice, 2004), p. 13.Google Scholar
40. Shakespeare, Steven, ‘The Community of the Question: Inclusive Ecclesiology’, in Mannion, G. (ed.), Church and Religious ‘Other’: Essays on Truth, Unity and Diversity (London: T&T Clark, 2008), pp. 156–167.Google Scholar
41. Keller, Nausner and Rivera, Postcolonial Theologies, p. 13.Google Scholar
42. Keller, Nausner and Rivera, Postcolonial Theologies, p. 62.Google Scholar
43. Keller, Nausner and Rivera, Postcolonial Theologies, p. 69.Google Scholar
44. Keller, Nausner and Rivera, Postcolonial Theologies, p. 81.Google Scholar
45. Rivera, Mayra, The Touch of Transcendence: A Postcolonial Theology of God (Louisville: Westminster John Know, 2007), p. 137.Google Scholar