Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:14:19.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theological Accoutrements of Anti-Pluralism: The Confused Fate of American Episcopalianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Ephraim Radner
Ephraim Radner
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the theological and ecclesial tensions that resulted from transplanting the established episcopalian polity and vision of the Church of England within the context of an evolving religious pluralism in America. The theological integralism of Anglican self-understanding as a result was forced to adjust itself in different and still uncomfortable ways within American Episcopalianism, and subsequent limitations on and inner conflicts within Anglican life in the United States (and beyond) are tied in part to these still unresolved tensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , June 2004 , pp. 22 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) and The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cf. Hutcheson, Richard Jr and Shriver, Peggy, The Divided Church: Moving Liberals and Conservatives from Diatribe to Dialogue (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999)Google Scholar, ch. 3, ‘Sociological Help in Understanding the Splits’; while dated, the material cited here is still helpful.

2. Cf. McGrath, Alister, The Future of Christianity (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar

3. Although its major focus is on a later era, Nockles', Peter B.The Oxford Movement in Context: Anglican High Churchmanship 1760–1857 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar contains a good bibliography on relevant material. For background on the American scene, and a discussion of the nineteenth century in particular, see Mullin, Bruce, Episcopal Vision/American Reality: High Church Theology and Social Thought in Evangelical America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

4. This argument forms the major focus of Book VIII of Hooker, 's Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical PolityGoogle Scholar. See especially ch. 4.

5. The best treatment is Ellis's, Joseph J.The New England Mind in Transition: Samuel Johnson of Connecticut, 1696–1772 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

6. Schneider, H. and Schneider, C. (eds.), Samuel Johnson of King's College: His Career and Writings (4 vols.; New York: Columbia University Press, 1929), recently reprinted by Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

7. Schneider, and Schneider, , Samuel Johnson, I, p. 15.Google Scholar

8. On the important connection between Johnson and George Berkeley, see Gaustad, Edwin, George Berkeley in America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979)Google Scholar and Berman, David, George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar, especially ch. 5, pp. 98–133. The correspondence between Johnson and Berkeley can be found in many standard editions of Berkeley's philosophical works.

9. Schneider, and Schneider, , Samuel Johnson, III, p. 20.Google Scholar

10. Schneider, and Schneider, , Samuel Johnson, III, p. 29.Google Scholar

11. Schneider, and Schneider, , Samuel Johnson, III, p. 30.Google Scholar

12. The term here is used broadly, and is to be distinguished from those historically particular movements from within nineteenth-century Continental and (with a different twist) American Roman Catholicism.

13. Address to the British Government (1776).Google Scholar

14. His interest in Berkeley's immaterialism, while shared with others, was in part tied to his integralist orientation. (Scholars of Berkeley's own religious views have only begun to reflect on the connections between his metaphysics and his hermeneutics and ecclesiology.)

15. For references, see Radner, Ephraim, The End of the Church (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998), pp. 102–103.Google Scholar

16. See White, William, The Case of the Episcopal Churches in the United States Considered (Philadelphia: David Claypoole, 1782)Google Scholar. White's seminal discussion of what an Episcopal Church in America might be, somehow still part of ‘the communion’ represented by the Church of England and its traditions, is fascinating and confused: the mixtures of commitment to ‘conformity’ and ‘latitude’, forms and freedoms, are hard to sort out. The discussion of taste in worship and polity can be found in the Preface and ch. 2, among others.

17. Many of the anti-intellectual elements described in Noll's, MarkThe Scandal of the Evangelical Mind (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995)Google Scholar can be easily extracted from contemporary episcopal attitudes and practice mutatis mutandis.

18. Niebuhr, H. Richard, The Social Sources of Denominationalism (New York: The World Publishing Co., 1957 [1929]), p. 284.Google Scholar

19. See MacIntyre, Alisdair, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989).Google Scholar

20. See Lindbeck, George A. and Buckley, James J. (eds.), The Church in a Post-Liberal Age (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar

21. See Pannenberg, Wolfhart, Systematic Theology (3 vols.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans) esp. vol. 1 (1991) and vol. 3 (1997).Google Scholar

22. Sykes, Stephen, The Identity of Christianity (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984), pp. 250–60.Google Scholar