Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:16:25.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wages, Work, and the Industrial Past in Three Contemporary Labor Market Narratives – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2023

JEFFREY GONZALEZ*
Affiliation:
Department of English, Montclair State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Erratum
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the British Association for American Studies

When this article was originally published in the Journal of American Studies it contained an unapproved edit in the line:

The temporal timeline summoned by the often used terms “deindustrialization” or “postindustrialization” both marks contemporary life as beyond a point defined by the hegemony of industrial labor, and, however, implicitly posit that manufacturing labor's decreasing significance nevertheless still matters in the present.

This sentence should read as follows:

The temporal timeline summoned by the oft-used terms “deindustrialization” or “postindustrialization” both mark contemporary life as beyond a point defined by the hegemony of industrial labor, yet implicitly posit that manufacturing labor's decreasing significance nevertheless still matters in the present.

This was introduced during production and was unintended by the author. The publisher apologises for this error.

References

GONZALEZ, J. (2023). Wages, Work, and the Industrial Past in Three Contemporary Labor Market Narratives. Journal of American Studies, 127. doi:10.1017/S0021875823000269Google Scholar