Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
In the opening pages of his 1971 study, Politics as Symbolic Action, Murray Edelman underlines his belief that “psychological characteristics, social interaction, and political acts are alternative expressions of the same phenomenon.” In the discussion that follows, however, he tacitly privileges the political aspect of the transaction to an extent that quite undermines his initial image of an interdependent network of reactive/responsive processes. The bias is an understandable one, given his anxiety to counter the naive view of “governmental acts as reflections of people's cognitions.” It is also, unfortunately, a problematic one, insofaras its implication of a self-consciously Machiavellian political leadership deliberately manipulating public affect to its own ends simply substitutes for one misapprehension another equally naive.
1 Politics as Symbolic Action (Chicago: Markham, 1971), 6.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., 41.
3 “The Rhetoric of the American Western Myth,” Communication Monographs, 50 (1983), 14.Google Scholar
4 “Archetypal Alloy: Reagan's Rhetorical Image,” in Browne, Ray B. and Fishwick, Marshall W., eds., The Hero in Transition (Bowling Green: The Popular Press, 1983), 267.Google Scholar
5 “Structuralism and Popular Culture,” Journal of Popular Culture, 7 (1974), 761.Google Scholar
6 “The Myth of Superman,” in The Role of the Reader (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979), 123.Google Scholar
7 Introduction to “Machines, Myths, and Marxism,” in Teresa, de Lauretis, Andreas, Huyssen, and Kathleen, Woodward, eds., The Technological Imagination: Theories and Fictions (Madison: Coda Press, 1980), 80.Google Scholar
8 See Henry, Nash Smith, Virgin Land: The American West as Symbol and Myth (New York: Vintage, 1950)Google Scholar; also Richard, Slotkin, Regeneration through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600–1860 (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
9 Frank, Herbert, Dune (New York: Berkeley, 1965), 284.Google Scholar
10 Structural Fabulation: An Essay on Fiction of the Future (Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975), 68.Google Scholar
11 The Adventurer (New York: Basic Books, 1974), 234.Google Scholar
12 “Romances, Novels and Psychoanalysis,” Criticism, 17 (1975), 21.Google Scholar
13 Structural Fabulation, 5.
14 John, Cawelti, Adventure, Mystery, and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and Popular Culture (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1976), 35.Google Scholar
15 John, Huntington, “Science Fiction and the Future,” in Mark, Rose, ed., Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976), 159.Google Scholar
16 For representative views see Adorno, T. W., “Television and the Patterns of Mass Culture,” in Bernard, Rosenberg and David, Manning White, eds., Mass Culture: The Popular Arts in America (New York: The Free Press, 1957), 474–88Google Scholar, and Marcuse, Herbert, One-Dimensional Man (London: Sphere Books, 1968)Google Scholar; see also discussions in Bigsby, C. W. E., Approaches to Popular Culture (London: Edward Arnold, 1976)Google Scholar, Jay, Martin, The Ideological Imagination (London: Heinemann, 19733)Google Scholar, and Andreas Huyssen in de Lauretis et al.
17 Roger, Elwood and Virginia, Kidd, eds., The Wounded Planet (New York: Bantam, 1974), ix.Google Scholar
18 Walker, Robert H., “Patterns in Recent American Literature,” in Hague, John A., ed., American Character and Culture in a Changing World: Some Twentieth-Century Perspectives (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1979), 69.Google Scholar
19 “Certain Assistances: The Utilities of Speculative Fictions in Shaping the Future,” Mosaic, 13 (1980), 10.Google Scholar
20 Meyersohn, Rolf B., “Social Research in Television,” in Rosenberg and White, 353.Google Scholar
21 Rollin, Roger R., “The Lone Ranger and Lenny Skutnik: The Hero as Popular Culture,” in Browne and Fishwick, 25.Google Scholar
22 See Fiedler, Leslie A., “The Middle against Both Ends,” in Rosenberg and White, 537–47.Google Scholar
23 “Between Consciousness and Existence: Popular Culture and the Sociological Imagination,” Journal of Popular Culture, 15 (1982), 86.Google Scholar
24 See also Roger Rollin, 42–44.
25 Barbu, Zev, “Popular Culture: A Sociological Approach,” in Bigsby, 48–49.Google Scholar
26 See Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “The Story of Asdiwal,” in Edmund, Leach, ed., The Structural Study of Myth and Totemism (London: Tavistock, 1968), 49–70.Google Scholar
27 Roger Rollin, 39.
28 See Wymer, Stanley, “Perception and Value in Science Fiction,” in Thomas, Clareson, ed., Many Futures, Many Worlds: Theme and Form in Science Fiction (Kent State University Press, 1977), 1–13.Google Scholar
29 Hillegas, Mark, The Future as Nightmare: H. G. Wells and the Anti-Utopians (Carbonville and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1967), 59.Google Scholar
30 Wells, H. G., Men Like Gods (Toronto: Macmillan, 1923), 107.Google Scholar
31 Clareson, Thomas, Many Futures, Many Worlds, 17.Google Scholar
32 Asimov, Isaac, “Social Science Fiction,” in Damon, Knight, ed., Turning Points: Essays on the Art of Science Fiction (New York: Harper & Row, 1977)Google Scholar, especially 39–43.
33 For specific references, see the annotated bibliography in Richard, Erlich and Thomas, Dunn, eds., Clockwork Worlds: Mechanized Environments in SF (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1983), 263ff.Google Scholar
34 Walker, , “Patterns in Recent American Fiction,” 78.Google Scholar
35 See, for instance, Kolodny, Annette, The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience and History in American Life and Letters (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1975).Google Scholar
36 See Scholes, , Structural Fabulation, 81–82.Google Scholar
37 Jacques, Lemieux, “Utopias and Social Relations in American Science Fiction,” trans. Ronald, Rosenthal, SF Studies, 12 (1985), 152.Google Scholar
38 William, Nelson, “Unlikely Heroes: The Central Figures in The World According to Garp, Even Cowgirls Get the Blues, and A Confederacy of Dunces,” in Browne and Fishwick, 170.Google Scholar
39 “Science Fiction, New Trends and Old,” in Reginald, Bretnor, ed., Science Fiction, Today and Tomorrow (Baltimore: Penguin, 1974), 222.Google Scholar
40 Beyond the Wasteland: A Study of the American Novel in the Nineteen-Sixties (New Haven & New York: Yale University Press), 223.Google Scholar
41 Ibid., 222.
42 “As the Wall Crumbles,” in James, Gunn, ed., Nebula Award Stories Ten (Notre Dame & London: University of Notre Dame Press), 102.Google Scholar
43 The Adventurer, 249.
44 Ibid., 20.
45 Adventure, Mystery, and Romance, 16.
46 The Shattered Ring (Richmond: John Knox Press, 1970), 51.Google Scholar
47 See Poul, Anderson, “The Art of Robert Erving Howard,” in de Camp, L. Sprague, ed., The Blade of Conan (New York: Ace, 1979), 79–96.Google Scholar
48 See Gary, Hoppenstand, “Pulp Vigilante Heroes, the Moral Majority, and the Apocalypse,” in Browne and Fishwick, 148–49.Google Scholar
49 “Eutopias and Dystopias in Science Fiction, 1950–75,” in Roehmer, Kenneth M., ed., America as Utopia (New York: Burt Franklin, 1981), 349.Google Scholar
50 “Coming Home a Hero: The Changing Image of the Vietnam Vet on Prime Time Television,” Journal of Popular Film and Television, 13 (1985), 25.Google Scholar
51 Ibid., 29.
52 The Technological Society, trans. John, Wilkinson (New York: Knopf, 1967), 4.Google Scholar
53 The Myth of the Machine, Vol. 1, Technics and Human Development (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1966), 3.Google Scholar
54 See, for instance, Ingersoll, Daniel W. Jr, “Machines Are Good to Think: A Structural Analysis of Myth and Mechanization,” in Erlich and Dunn, 235–262.Google Scholar
55 Slade, Joseph W., “American Writers and American Inventions: Cybernetic Discontinuity in Pre-World War II Literature,” in De Lauretis, Huyssen, and Woodward, 28.Google Scholar
56 Ibid., 46.
57 “Utopias and Social Relations,” 153.
58 The Creation of Tomorrow: Fifty Years of Magazine Science Fiction (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), 82–83.Google Scholar
59 “American Victorianism as a Culture,” American Quarterly, 27 (1975), 522.Google Scholar
60 Leo, Ribuffo, ed., American Quarterly (special issue on contemporary America), 35 (1983), 9.Google Scholar
61 “Politics,” in Ribuffo, 29.
62 “1984: Are We There?,” Salmagundi, 65 (1984), 51–62.Google Scholar