No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
President Reagan, the U.S. Senate, and American Foreign Policy, 1981–1986
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
Extract
The Republican loss of majority status in the U.S. Senate following the mid-term elections of 1986, and the disclosure of the Reagan Administration's secret arms sales to Iran and diversion of funds to the Nicaraguan Contras, effectively brought to an end six years of senatorial deference to presidential foreign policy-making. From 1981 to 1986 the Republican-controlled Senate had generally afforded President Reagan a degree of latitude in the making of foreign policy which not only contrasted markedly with that of hisimmediate predecessors, but also prepared the atmosphere for the type of adventures pursued by Colonel Oliver North. Whereas the foreign policy initiatives of Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter had been subject to considerable scrutiny by senators, thereby forcing a detailed examination of their consequences, the forbearance shown to the Reagan Administration by the Senate encouraged a much less diligent approach to policy-making.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987
References
1 Nathan, James A. and Oliver, James K., Forezgn Policy Making and the American Political System (Boston: Little, Brown, 1983), 110.Google Scholar
2 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 13 May 1978, 1180.
3 Spanier, John and Uslaner, Eric M., Foreign Policy and the Democratic Dilemma (New York: CBS College Publishing, 1982), 85.Google Scholar
4 CongressionalQuarterly Weekly Report, 21 Feb. 1981, 359.
5 For an interesting account of the changing nature of American public opinion on foreign policy issues during the late 1970s see Muravchik, Joshua, “The Senate and National Security: A New Mood,” in Abshine, David M. and Nurnberger, Ralph D., eds., The Growing Power of Congress (Beverley Hills: Sage, 1981), 261–264.Google Scholar
6 For an examination of the issues with which these senators were concerned in the post-Vietnam period see Javits, Jacob, Who Makes War? The President Versus The Congress (New York: Morrow, 1973).Google Scholar
7 Percy, Charles H., “The Partisan Gap,” in Foreign Policy, 45 (1981–1982), 9.Google Scholar
8 Tower, John G., “Congress Versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy,” Foreign Affairs, 60, 2 (1981/1982), 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 14 March 1981, 477.
10 New York Times, 1 Oct. 1981, A9.
11 Tower, 233.
12 See Joshua Muravchik, 235–36.
13 Fenno, Richard F., Congressmen in Committees (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973), 141.Google Scholar
14 These were Frank Church (D. Idaho), Jacob Javits (R.N.Y.), George McGovern (D.S.D.), and Richard Stone (D. Fla.). The only member to gain re-election was John Glenn (D. Ohio).
15 New York Times, 24 March 1980, 136.
16 For an excellent study of the background, provisions, and history of the War Powers Provision, see Turner, Robert F., The War Powers Resolution: Its Implementation in Theory and Practice (Philadelphia, Foreign Policy Research Institute, 1983).Google Scholar
17 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 14 March 1981, 479.
18 Tower, 238.
19 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 28 Aug. 1982, 2158.
20 Reagan, Ronald, Public Papers 1982, Vol. 2, 1078–79.Google Scholar
21 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 2 Oct. 1982, 2464.
22 Ronald Reagan, 1238.
23 Congressional Quarterly 1983 Almanac, 114.
24 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 1 Oct. 1983, 2015.
25 New York Times, 7 Sept. 1983, A 23.
26 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 17 Sept. 1983, 1919.
27 New York Times, 17 Sept. 1983, A4.
28 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 12 Nov. 1983, 2359.
29 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 14 April 1984, 833.
30 Heineman, Ben W. and Hessles, Curtis A., Memorandum for the President (New York: Random House, 1980), 91.Google Scholar
31 James Madison, “Federalist Paper No. 46”, in Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John, The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton, Rossiter (New York: New American Library, 1961), 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Rourke, John, Congress and the Presidency in U.S. Foreign Policymaking (Boulder: Westview Press, 1983), 239.Google Scholar
33 Congressional Record, 95th Congress, 2and sess., 15 May 1978, S. 7378.
34 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 22 May 1982, 1180.
35 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 12 Feb. 1983, 344.
36 Jeanne Kirkpatrick's views on human rights policies and foreign policy in general are contained in two collections of her essays. See Kirkpatrick, Jeanne, Dictatorship and Double Standards: Rationalism and Reason in Politics (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982)Google Scholar; and Kirkpatrick, Jeanne, The Reagan Phenomenon and Other Speeches on Foreign Policy (Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1983).Google Scholar
37 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 23 May 1981, 900.
38 Congressional Quarter1y Weekly Report, 19 July 1986, 1606.
39 See Destler, I. M., “The Evolution of Reagan's Foreign Policy,” in Greenstein, Fred I., ed., The Reagan Presidency (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983), 121–23.Google Scholar
40 Cited by Haig, Alexander, Caveat (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1984), 185.Google Scholar
41 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 11 April 1981, 632.
42 Rourke, , Congress and the Presidency in U.S. Foreign Policjmaking, 259.Google Scholar
43 The eight senators who changed their minds were: Mark Andrews (R.N.D.), William Cohn (R. Mi.), Slade Gorkin (R. Wash.), Orrin Hatch (R. Utah), Roger Jepsen (R. Iowa), Larry Pressler (R. S.D.), Alan Simpson (R. Wyo.), and Edward Zorinsky (D. Neb.).
44 New York Times, 28 Oct. 1981, A1.
45 Conressiona1 Quarter1y Weekly Report, 5 Nov. 1983, 2291.
46 See John, Spanier and John, Nogee, eds., Congress, the Presidency and American Foreign Policy (New York: Pergamon, 1981).Google Scholar