Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:49:07.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lineaments of Foreign Policy: The United States and a “New World Order,” 1919–39

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Kathleen Burk
Kathleen Burk
Affiliation:
Lecturer in History, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The idea of a “new world order,” of an opportunity to remake a broken world into a more liberal and democratic place, was very much in the air in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Some historians were encouraged to look at earlier periods with this concept in mind, and this essay is the result of one such attempt. The whole idea of an attempt to build a new world order has a very positive ring about it. At the least it seems to assume a plan, and an active personality or two behind the plan; it also assumes a global reach. If these are in any sense requirements, the United States during the interwar period fulfilled them only partially and erratically. Certainly, if one looks for the strong, general pattern in American foreign policy during this period, the culmination of many smaller plans and patterns, one can be found: the drive to convince the world to adopt policies leading to an international economy characterised by free trade, convertible currencies and open markets, and along with that, the drive to convince countries to disarm. All American administrations from 1919 to 1939 would have agreed with these policy imperatives. But what is undeniable is that they varied in their emphases, in the efforts which US governments themselves made to get these policies accepted. Only Woodrow Wilson had a plan, and only he sought to involve the US Government permanently in this process, to the extent of tying it down to future responsibilities: all others preferred, when feasible, merely to give indicative guidance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 377 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In the Spring of 1992 Mr. J. P. D. Dunbabin, Professor Robert O'Neill and DrWright, J. R. C. organised a seminar series at Oxford University around the title, “The Attempt to Build a New World Order 1919–1939.” The present essay formed part of this series.Google Scholar

2 See Ferrell, Robert H., Peace in Their Time: The Origins of the Kellogg-Briand Pact (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952).Google Scholar

3 See Ambrosius, Lloyd E., Woodrow Wilson and the American Diplomatic Tradition: The Treaty Fight in Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 See, for example, Rosenberg, Emily S., Spreading the American Dream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion, 1890–1945 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982).Google Scholar

5 See for example, Leffler, Melvyn P., The Elusive Quest: America's Pursuit of European Stability and French Security, 1919–1933 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979).Google Scholar

6 See Alder, Selig, The Isolationist Impulse: Its Twentieth Century Reaction (1957; rept. New York: Free Press, 1966)Google Scholar and Cole, Wayne, Roosevelt and the Isolationists, 1932–1945 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983).Google Scholar

7 See for example Hogan, Michael J., Informal Entente: The Private Structure of Cooperation in Anglo-American Economic Diplomacy, 1918–1928 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Schuker, Stephen A., The End of French Predominance in Europe: The Financial Crisis of 1924 and the Adoption of the Dawes Plan (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Meyer, Richard Hemming, Bankers' Diplomacy: Monetary Stabilization in the Twenties (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Silverman, Dan P., Reconstructing Europe After the Great War (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Orde, Anne, British Policy and European Reconstruction After the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trachtenberg, Marc, Reparation in World Politics: France and European Economic Diplomacy, 1916–1923 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980)Google Scholar; and Burk, Kathleen, Morgan Grenfell 1838–1988: The Biography of a Merchant Bank (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), chapter 5.Google Scholar

8 Briefly, the Neutrality Act of 1935 placed a mandatory embargo on “arms, ammunition, or implements of war,” the last-named to be defined by the President; it prohibited US ships from carrying munitions to belligerent states; and it gave the President discretion to withhold protection from Americans travelling on belligerent ships. The Neutrality Act of 1936 extended parts of that of 1935, and in addition forbade loans to belligerents and made mandatory an arms embargo on states entering a war in progress. The Neutrality Act of 1937 gave the President discretion to withhold raw materials from belligerents and to apply the arms embargo to civil wars. Finally, the Neutrality Act of 1939 repealed the arms embargo and instituted the sale of goods on a cash-and-carry basis.

9 See Gelfand, Lawrence E., The Inquiry: American Preparations for Peace, 1917–1919 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

10 See Ambrosius, passim.; Egerton, George, Great Britain and the Creation of the League of Nations: Strategy, Politics and International Organization, 1914–1919 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1978)Google Scholar and idem, “Ideology, Diplomacy, and International Organization: Wilsonism and the League of Nations in Anglo-American Relations, 1918–1920,” in McKercher, Brian, ed., Anglo-American Relations in the 1920s: The Struggle for Supremacy (London: Macmillan, 1991), 17–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 This section of the letter is printed in Seymour, Charles, The Intimate Papers of Colonel House. Volume II: From Neutrality to War 1915–1917 (London: Ernest Benn Limited, 1926), 88–89.Google Scholar

12 See for example John Ferris, “The Symbol and the Substance of Seapower: Great Britain, the United States and the One Power Standard, 1919–1921” in McKercher, ed., 55–80; McKercher, Brian, The Second Baldwin Government and the United States, 1924–1929: Attitudes and Diplomacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and The Modernisation of Conservative Politics: The Diaries and Letters of William Bridgeman, 1904–1935, ed. Williamson, Philip (London: The Historians' Press, 1988), chapter 7.Google Scholar

13 Ferrell, , 264–5.Google Scholar

14 Marks, Sally, The Illusion of Peace: International Relations in Europe 1918–1933 (London: Macmillan, 1976), 100.Google Scholar

15 Burk, , 92–93.Google Scholar

16 See especially Leffler.

17 See Burk, , Schuker, , Orde, , McNeil, William C., American Money and the Weimar Republic: Economics and Politics on the Eve of the Great Depression (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986)Google Scholar and Costigliola, Frank C., “The Other Side of Isolation: The Establishment of the First World Bank, 1929–1930,” Journal of American History, 59 (1972), 602–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 See Orde, , 73–77, 104–107Google Scholar; Fink, Carole, The Genoa Conference: European Diplomacy, 1921–1922 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1984)Google Scholar; and Fink, Carole, Frohn, Axel and Heideking, Jürgen, eds., Genoa, Rapallo, and European Reconstruction in 1922 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 See Schuker.

20 See Leffler, , and Brandes, Joseph, Herbert Hoover and Economic Diplomacy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962).Google Scholar

21 See Clavin, Patricia, “‘The Fetishes of So-Called International Bankers’: Central Bank Co-operation for the World Economic Conference, 1932–3,” Contemporary European History, 1 (1992), 278–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Dallek, Robert, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), 23–57.Google Scholar

22 See Rock, William, Chamberlain and Roosevelt: British Foreign Policy and the United States, 1937–1940 (Columbus: University of Ohio Press, 1988), 58–76.Google Scholar

23 See Drummond, Ian, The Floating Pound and the Sterling Area, 1931–1939 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chapter 9 and Clarke, Stephen V. O., Exchange-Rate Stabilization in the Mid-1930s: Negotiating the Tripartite Agreement (Princeton: Princeton University Studies in International Finance No. 41, 09 1977).Google Scholar

24 See Kreider, Carl, The Anglo-American Trade Agreement: A Study of British and American Commercial Policies, 1934–1939 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1943)Google Scholar; Woods, Randall Bennett, A Changing of the Guard: Anglo-American Relations, 1941–1946 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Gardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective, expanded edition (1956; rept. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980)Google Scholar; and Pressnell, L. S., External Economic Policy Since the War. Volume I: The Post-War Financial Settlement (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1987).Google Scholar

25 Burk, Kathleen, “Economic Diplomacy Between the Wars,” Historical Journal, 24 (1981), 1003–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Dunne, Michael makes an analogous complaint in “Isolationism of a Kind: Two Generations of World Court Historiography in the United States,” Journal of American Studies, 21 (1987), 327–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 “Revival and Reform: America's Twentieth-Century Search for a New Economic Order Abroad,” Diplomatic History, 8 (1984), 288.Google Scholar

28 Gaddis, John Lewis, “The Corporatist Synthesis: A Skeptical View”, Diplomatic History, 10 (1986), 357–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Hogan, Michael J., “Corporatism: A Positive Appraisal”, Diplomatic History, 10 (1986), 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Ibid., 367.

31 McKercher, Brian, “Reaching for the Brass Ring: The Recent Historiography of Interwar American Foreign Relation”, Diplomatic History, 15 (1991), 584–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Indeed, Watt makes clear that there are differences between the American and European “foreign-policymaking elites”; see his Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain's Place 1900–1975 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 1–23.Google Scholar

33 See footnote 31.

34 The present author discovered that she was numbered amongst them.

35 Costigliola, Frank, Awkward Dominion: American Political, Economic, and Cultural Relations With Europe, 1919–1933 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar