Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:03:03.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Slurs in Boston's Partisan Press During the 1840s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2001

RONALD J. ZBORAY  and
MARY SARACINO ZBORAY
RONALD J. ZBORAY
Affiliation:
Department of History, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4117, Atlanta, GA 30302-4117, USA
MARY SARACINO ZBORAY
Affiliation:
Department of History, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4117, Atlanta, GA 30302-4117, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the height of the 1840 presidential campaign season, the Democratic editor, Charles Gordon Greene, printed in his Boston Morning Post the following lampoon of the September 10 Bunker Hill Whig Convention: “ ‘Madam, I am astonished that you do not wave your handkerchief; I thought that the women were all whigs,’ said a gentleman to a lady while the procession was passing by them on Thursday. ‘You are mistaken, sir,’ was the answer – ‘the whigs are all women.’ ” Greene efficiently slung this partisan mud at the 80,000 men and women who demonstrated their support for the Whigs at the gathering. The editor fastened upon the opposition's previous pronouncement that “ ‘The Ladies are all Whigs’ ” and inverted it to effeminize men who would vote for William Henry Harrison. “The Whigs are all women,” “Colonel” Greene now declared. On this page of one of Boston's most widely read dailies, the gender of both Whig men and women was questioned and distinctions between them became blurred in unflattering ways. Greene thus defiled both sexes with one swift printed gesture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 413 - 446
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A version of this paper was presented on 18 April 1997, at the Organization of American Historians' Ninetieth Annual Meeting in San Francisco. We wish to thank our commentators, Norma Basch and Deborah Bingham Van Broekhoven, for their insightful and encouraging remarks. Dennis Laurie and the library staff of the American Antiquarian Society extended their expertise in guiding us through the repository's vast collection of antebellum newspapers. We also appreciate the thoughtful insights of the editors and our anonymous reviewer for the Journal of American Studies.