Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T20:54:20.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Exceptionalist Optics of 9/11 Photography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2014

JOSEPH DARDA
JOSEPH DARDA*
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Connecticut. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During and after the 2001 attacks on New York City and Washington, thousands of photographs were taken. None, however, would become as iconic as Thomas Franklin's photo of three firefighters raising an American flag above the rubble of the World Trade Center. Franklin's photo, I argue in this essay, casts 9/11 in the familiar myth of American exceptionalism, screening out but still gesturing to the heterogeneous memories left unsettled and animate in amateur photographs, missing-person posters, bodies in pain, and performance. In considering the struggle over the visual memory of the attacks, I first consider how, in the wake of 9/11, the discourse of exceptionalism served to disavow the exceptions historically taken by the state and to rationalize the War on Terror. I show how this system of myths works in dialectical relation to other disruptive forms of cultural memory. I then read Franklin's iconic photograph as a screen by which traumatic memories are masked and onto which nationalist desires are projected. Finally, I analyze 9/11 photography that troubles the exceptionalist optics of Franklin's photo by evoking the visual legacy of the Vietnam War and so challenging the logic of righteous warfare.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 185 - 204
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and British Association for American Studies 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Benjamin, Walter, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” in Benjamin, , Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, trans. Zohn, Harry (New York: Schocken, 1968), 217–42, 236–37Google Scholar.

2 Taylor, Diana, The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107–67, 115 Stat. 514 (2001); Zaslow, Jeffrey, “Honoring Heroes of Sept. 11 Stirs a Delicate Debate,” Washington Post, 5 Sept. 2002Google Scholar, eastern edition.

4 Benjamin, 237.

5 Edkins, Jenny, Trauma and the Memory of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), xiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar. Edkins's broader concerns are tied to the work of Giorgio Agamben and his theory of “bare life.” Agamben argues that the originary activity of sovereign power is the production of bare life in which the human is doubly excluded: barred from political life and yet included as the biological locus of politics. Bare life is today, he adds, being rendered not only visible but universal, as this biopolitical threshold becomes normalized throughout the world. Edkins introduces trauma time as a way of reclaiming the political in an age of biopower. Agamben, Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Heller-Roazen, Daniel (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 28–29, 187–88Google Scholar.

6 Edkins, 16.

7 Pease, Donald E., The New American Exceptionalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009), 32–35Google Scholar. For further reading on the history and theory of American exceptionalism see Dawson, Ashley and Schueller, Malini Johar, eds., Exceptional State: Contemporary U.S. Culture and the New Imperialism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kaplan, Amy, The Anarchy of Empire in the Making of U.S. Culture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Rowe, John Carlos, Literary Culture and U.S. Imperialism: From the Revolution to World War II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; and Spanos, William V., American Exceptionalism in the Age of Globalization: The Spector of Vietnam (Albany: SUNY Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

8 Žižek, Slavoj, For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor, repr. (London: Verso, 2002; first published 1991), 272, original emphasisGoogle Scholar.

9 As Kaplan underscores, “Ground Zero” refers to the site of nuclear detonation at the same time that it implies a clean slate. Naming Ground Zero as such suggests that the United States lost its innocence on 11 September 2001 – not during the Native American genocide or the Mexican–American War – and that the attacks represent an incomparable trauma, apart from history. Kaplan, Amy, “Homeland Insecurities: Some Reflections on Language and Space,” Radical History Review, 85 (2003), 82–93, 83Google Scholar.

10 Young, James E., The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 15Google Scholar.

11 Zehfuss identifies the danger in too readily embracing memory as a means of challenging the War on Terror. The 9/11 attacks were, she notes, construed as a singular “‘uncaused’ cause,” an event that necessitated a vaguely defined global war and yet was itself without a cause. This has allowed the “memory of the dead” to be used as a rationale for warfare and the vast surveillance of individuals within and beyond the United States. Zehfuss, Maja, “Forget September 11,” Third World Quarterly, 24, 3 (2003), 513–28, 520–21, 525–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Zelizer, Barbie, About to Die: How News Images Move the Public (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 16–17Google Scholar.

13 In this definition of screen memories, I build on Marita Sturken's particular adaptation of the Freudian concept. Sturken, Marita, Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the Aids Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 8, 44Google Scholar.

14 Freud, Sigmund, “Screen Memories,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume III (London: Hogarth, 1962), 301–22, 322, original emphasisGoogle Scholar.

15 Barthes, Roland, “The Photographic Message,” in Image-Music-Text, trans. Heath, Stephen (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 15–31, 19Google Scholar.

16 Azoulay, Ariella, Civil Imagination: A Political Ontology of Photography, trans. Bethlehem, Louise (London: Verso, 2012), 26Google Scholar.

17 Ibid., 25.

18 For detailed accounts of the circulation and reproduction of Franklin's photograph, see Sturken, Marita, Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), 188–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hariman, Robert and Lucaites, John Louis, No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007), 128–36Google Scholar; and Friend, David, Watching the World Change: The Stories behind the Images of 9/11 (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006), 311Google Scholar.

19 Sturken, Tourists of History, 190.

20 For more thorough analyses of how Franklin's photograph draws on and resituates Rosenthal's, see Helmers, Marguerite and Hill, Charles A., introduction to Helmers, and Hill, , eds., Defining Visual Rhetorics (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004), 1–23Google Scholar; and Westwell, Guy, “One Image Begets Another: A Comparative Analysis of Flag-Raising on Iwo Jima and Ground Zero Spirit,” Journal of War and Cultural Studies, 1, 3 (2008), 325–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Helmers and Hill detail how historical and circumstantial knowledge was integral to the rhetorical weight viewers granted Franklin's photo. Westwell shows how the legacy of Rosenthal's iconic photo was not always as secure as commentators might have imagined in 2001, having been reframed during the late-century rise of the New Right and by the cultural revising of World War II history.

21 George W. Bush, “Address before a Joint Session of the Congress on the United States Response to the Terrorist Attacks of September 11,” 20 Sept. 2001, The American Presidency Project, at www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=64731&st=&st1=.

22 For further discussion of the origins of Cold War containment/integration policies, see Klein, Christina, Cold War Orientalism: Asian in the Middlebrow Imagination, 1945–1961 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), 24–28Google Scholar.

23 Kaplan, Anarchy of Empire, 16.

24 Harry S. Truman, “Recommendation for Assistance to Greece and Turkey: Address of the President of the United States,” 12 March 1947, Harry S. Truman Library and Museum, at www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/doctrine/large/documents/index.php?documentdate=1947-03-12&documentid=5-9&pagenumber=1.

25 Hariman and Lucaites, 17.

26 Franklin himself took 24 other photographs of the firefighters. Rosenthal took a posed photo of the marines after raising the flag. Friend, 318; Hariman and Lucaites, 97.

27 Azoulay, Civil Imagination. 25.

28 Benjamin, Walter, The Arcades Project, trans. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999), 462–63Google Scholar.

29 Pease, New American Exceptionalism, 162. Spanos has also stressed how critical retrieving the “singularity of the Vietnam War” is to “challenging the United States' effort, based on its mythological status as a redeemer nation, to achieve global sovereignty.” Spanos, American Exceptionalism, xvii.

30 The cited passage falls within a larger theoretical project. Taylor, Archive and the Repertoire, 255, 28, distinguishes what she refers to as the scenario, a “reactivation” of the historical past that “bears the weight of accumulative repeats.” The scenario implicates the past in the present moment but also represents a space for the introduction of counterhistories and change.

31 Edkins, Trauma, xiv.

32 Sturken, Tangled Memories, 76, 78.

33 Young, Texture of Memory, xi.

34 Azoulay, 27.

35 Edkins, 229–30.

36 Gordon, Avery F., Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), 4Google Scholar.