Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:41:02.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Colonial Protest and Imperial Retrenchment: Indian Policy 1764–1768

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Peter Marshall
Affiliation:
McGill University

Extract

On 10 July 1764 the Board of Trade ordered the circulation of a plan for the future management of Indian affairs among the Governors and Indian Superintendents of the North American colonies and requested their comments and criticisms. Diplomatic, territorial and commercial relations with the Indians were to be conducted in future by imperial officials, who would assume powers previously wielded by the colonies. Less than four years later, on 7 March 1768, the Board recommended that responsibility for management of Indian relations be returned to the colonies. The Superintendents retained only the role of conducting diplomatic negotiations with die Indians in cases where more than one colony was concerned and were to be stripped of direct authority. The failure of this attempt to introduce imperial regulation of Indian affairs both reflected and confirmed the intractable problem posed by the west in the years before the Revolution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Plan for the Future Management of Indian Affairs’, 10 07 1764Google Scholar, in Alvord, C. W. and Carter, C. E. (eds.), Collections of the Illinois State Historical Library, vol. 10, pp. 273–81.Google Scholar Hereafter cited as IHC.

2 Lords of Trade to Hillsborough, 7 March 1768, IHC, vol. 16, pp. 183204.Google Scholar

3 [Knox, William] The Justice and Policy of the Late Act of Parliament … Asserted and Proved (London, 1774), p. 40.Google Scholar

4 Lawson, Murray G., Fur. A Study in English Mercantilism 1700–1775 (Toronto, 1943), p. 60.Google Scholar

5 Shelburne to Gage, 11 December 1766, in Carter, C. E. (ed.), The Correspondence of General Thomas Gage … (New Haven, 1933), vol. 2, pp. 47–9.Google Scholar Hereafter cited as Gage Corr. Humphreys, R. A., ‘Lord Shelburne and British Colonial Policy, 1766–1768’, English Historical Review, 50 (1935), 257–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarShy, John, Toward Lexington (Princeton, 1965), pp. 229–30.Google Scholar

6 Lords of Trade to Johnson, 10 July 1764, in O'Callaghan, E. B. (ed.), Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York (Albany, N.Y., 18531858), vol. 7, pp. 634–6.Google Scholar

7 Halifax to SirRobinson, Thomas, 30 04 1754.Google Scholar B.M. Add. MSS 33029, fo. 109.

8 Gage, to Johnson, , 3 06 1764Google Scholar, in The Papers of Sir William Johnson (Albany, N.Y., 19211962), vol. 4, p. 438.Google Scholar Hereafter cited as JP.

9 Johnson, to Amherst, , 15 11 1760Google Scholar; Amherst, to Johnson, , 19 11 1760. JP, vol. 10, pp. 197–8.Google Scholar

10 Penn, John to Gage, , 22 01 1765Google Scholar; Gage, to Croghan, , 30 03 1765Google Scholar, Gage MSS, W. L. Clements Library, University of Michigan.

11 Gage, to Governors, (circular), 7 12 1764, Gage MSSGoogle Scholar; Gage, to Halifax, , 13 12 1764, Gage Corr., vol. 1, p. 46.Google Scholar

12 Gage, to Johnson, , 22 06 1765, JP, vol. 11, p. 803.Google ScholarAlden, J. R., John Stuart and the Southern Colonial Frontier (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1944), pp. 210–13, 341–3.Google Scholar

13 Barrington, to Gage, (private), 10 10 1765, Gage MSSGoogle Scholar; Gage, to Conway, , 9 11 1765, Gage Corr., vol. 1, p. 74.Google Scholar

14 Humphreys, R. A., ‘Governor Murray's Views on the Plan of 1764 for the Management of Indian Affairs’, Canadian Historical Review, 16 (1935), 162–9.Google Scholar

15 Ouellet, Fernand, Histoire Economique et Sociale du Québec 1760–1850 (Montreal, 1966), pp. 54–5.Google Scholar

16 Jenyns, to Hardwicke, , 10 06 1765, B.M. Add. MSS 35,361, fo. 59.Google Scholar

17 Burt, A. L., The Old Province of Quebec (Toronto, 1968), vol. 1, pp. 109–10.Google Scholar

18 Howard, to Johnson, , 24 06 1765.Google ScholarJohnson, to Howard, , 2 07 1765.Google ScholarJohnson, to Traders of Michillimackinac, 2 07 1765.Google ScholarTraders at Michillimackinac, to Howard, , 5 07 1765. JP, vol. 11, pp. 805–6, 814–5, 816–7, 825–8.Google Scholar

19 Johnson, to Gage, , 24 02 1767Google Scholar, O'Callaghan, E. B. (ed.), Documentary History of the State of New-York (Albany, N.Y., 18491851), vol. 2, p. 842.Google ScholarJohnson, to Shelburne, , 1 04 1767, New York Colonial Documents, vol. 7, p. 915.Google Scholar

20 Creighton, D. G., The Commercial Empire of the St Lawrence (Toronto, 1937), pp. 45–7.Google Scholar

21 Phillips, Paul Chrisler, The Fur Trade (Norman, Okla., 1961), vol. 1, p. 577.Google ScholarReid, Marjorie G., ‘The Quebec Furtraders and Western Policy 1763–1774’, Canadian Historical Review, 6 (1925), 25–6.Google ScholarDonoughue, Bernard, British Politics and the American Revolution (London, 1964), p. 119n.Google ScholarCuneo, John R., Robert Rogers of the Rangers (New York, 1959), pp. 197–8.Google Scholar

22 Creighton, , op. cit., p. 42.Google Scholar

23 Lawson, , op. cit., p. 70.Google Scholar

24 Ouellet, , op. cit., pp. 80–1.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., pp. 93–4, 97–8.

26 Turnbull, George to Gage, , 10 01 1767, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

27 Gage, to Johnson, , 10 03 1765, JP, vol. 4, pp. 667–8.Google Scholar

28 Gage, to Johnson, , 25 07 1765Google Scholar, Ibid., p. 798.

29 Gage, to Johnson, , 24 11 1765Google Scholar, Ibid., p. 878.

30 Gage, to Johnson, , 10 02 1766, JP, vol. 12, p. 16.Google Scholar

31 Stuart, to Johnson, , 30 03 1766Google Scholar, Ibid., pp. 55–6.

32 Conway, to Gage, , 27 03 1766. Gage Corr., vol. 2, p. 34.Google Scholar

33 Gage, to Johnson, , 23 03 1766, JP, vol. 5, p. 94.Google Scholar

34 Barrington, to Gage, (private), 10 10 1765, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

35 Gage, to Barrington, , 18 12 1765, Gage Corr., vol. 2, pp. 318–22.Google Scholar

36 Barrington, to Gage, (private), 7 02 1766, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

37 Gage, to Johnson, , 25 12 1765, JP, vol. 11, p. 987.Google Scholar

38 Johnson, to Gage, , 7 01 1766, JP, vol. 5, p. 4.Google Scholar

39 Barrington, to Gage, (private), 7 02 1766, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

40 Gage, to Barrington, (private), 7 05 1766, Gage Corr., vol. 2, pp. 349–51.Google ScholarBarrington, to Gage, (private), 8 05, 24 06 1766, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

41 ‘Lord Barrington's Plan…’, 10 05 1766, IHC, vol. 11, pp. 234–43.Google Scholar

42 Enclosed in Barrington, to Gage, (private), 8 05 1766, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

43 Barrington, to Gage, (private), 12 09 1766, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

44 Shelburne, to Gage, , 13 09 1766, Gage Corr., vol. 2, p. 45.Google Scholar

45 ‘Remarks on the Plan for the Future Management of Indian Affairs—by Mr Jackson’ [11 1766], IHC, vol. 11, pp. 422–30.Google Scholar

46 Shelburne, to Gage, , 11 12 1766, Gage Corr., vol. 2, pp. 48–9.Google ScholarShelburne, to Johnson, , 11 12 1766, JP, vol. 5, p. 448.Google Scholar

47 Brooke, John, The Chatham Administration 1766–1678 (London, 1956), pp. 93–5.Google Scholar

48 Grafton, to Chatham, , 13 03 1767Google Scholar, Shelburne, to Chatham, , 13 03 1767Google Scholar, Taylor, William Stanhope and Pringle, John Henry (eds.), Correspondence of William Pitt, Earl of Chatham (London, 1838), vol. 3, pp. 232–6.Google Scholar

49 ‘Reasons for not diminishing American expence this year’, 30 03 1767, IHC, vol. 11, pp. 536–41.Google Scholar

50 Johnson, to Lords of Trade, 8 10 1764, IHC, vol. 10, pp. 339–42.Google Scholar

51 Alden, , op. cit., p. 249n.Google Scholar

52 Gage, to Lowndes, Charles, 24 11 1765, Gage Corr., vol. 2, p. 317.Google Scholar

53 Gage, to Barrington, , 10 12 1766Google Scholar, Ibid., p. 393.

54 ‘Proposals for the more exact and better carrying on and defraying the expences of his Majesty's Service in North America’, Ibid., pp. 394–5.

55 Shelburne, to Gage, , 11 12 1766Google Scholar, Ibid., pp. 47–9. Gage, to Shelburne, , 4 04 1767Google Scholar, ibid., vol. I, pp. 129–30.

56 Gage, to Johnson, , 7 04 1766, IHC, vol. 11, p. 213.Google Scholar‘Account of Expenses on Journey to the Illinois…’, 22 02 1767Google Scholar, Ibid., p. 511.

57 Gage, to Johnson, , 13 04 1767, JP, vol. 5, p. 536.Google Scholar

58 Barrington, to Gage, , 16 09 1765, Gage MSS.Google ScholarGage, to Conway, , 16 01 1766, Gage Corr., vol. 1, p. 79.Google Scholar

59 Johnson, to Gage, (private), 25 01 1766, JP, vol. 12, pp. 811.Google ScholarGage, to Johnson, , 13 04 1766, IHC, vol. 11, p. 213.Google Scholar

60 Gage, to Johnson, , 2 06 1766, IHC, vol. 11, pp. 246–7.Google ScholarJohnson, to Gage, , 14 06 1766, JP, vol. 12, pp. 104–6.Google ScholarGage, to Johnson, , 22 06 1766Google Scholar, ibid., pp. 110–12.

61 Johnson, to Gage, (private), 11 09 1767Google Scholar, Gage, to Johnson, , 21 09 1767, Documentary History … of New-York, vol. 2, pp. 863–5.Google Scholar

62 Memorial of Roberts, Benjamin, 21 08 1767, JP, vol. 5, pp. 632–4.Google Scholar

63 Cuneo, , op. cit., pp. 223–46 passim.Google Scholar

64 ‘Indian Expenditures, September 25, 1766’, IHC, vol. 11, pp. 388–90.Google ScholarGage, to Reid, , 14 04 1767, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

65 Johnson, to Gage, , 11 07 1767, Documentary History…of New-YorK, vol. 2, p. 859.Google ScholarGage, to Johnson, , 20 07 1767, JP, vol. 5, p. 601.Google ScholarGage, to Reid, , 22 07 1767, Gage MSS.Google Scholar

66 Cole, to Johnson, , 25 10 1767Google Scholar, Cole, to Croghan, , 25 10 1767, JP, vol. 5, pp. 748–52, 753–5Google Scholar

67 Shelburne, to Johnson, , 20 06 1767Google Scholar, Ibid., pp. 566–7. Johnson, to Gage, , 24 11 1767, Documentary History … of New-York, vol. 2, pp. 886–8.Google Scholar

68 For an account of these activities, see my article Sir William Johnson and the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, 1768’, Journal of American Studies, 1 (1967), 149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69 Labaree, L. W. (ed.), Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors 1670–1776 (New York, 1935), vol. 1, pp. 310–11.Google Scholar