No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cold War Ground Zero: Medicine, Psyops and the Bomb
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2009
Abstract
This essay takes a history-of-ideas approach to place American medicine and psychiatry within the context of the Cold War. Rather than focus on physical science and technology (as is often the case in studies of science and the Cold War), the essay shifts attention to the human sciences in order to consider the ways in which medical and psychiatric research was caught up in concerns over national defence. Various arguments have proposed that US research involving human subjects between the late 1940s and the mid-1960s contravened the Nuremberg Code, which was established in 1948 to formalize the ethical boundaries of medical research and prevent any repeat of the human experimentation widely practised in Nazi concentration camps. The essay focusses, particularly, on two phases of the Cold War: the medical and genetic testing linked to the dropping of the atom bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the psychological tests (often referred to as “psyops”) beginning in the World War II years but developing rapidly during the Korean War. The aim of the essay is to link a phenomenological approach to the Cold War – in which the figures of the “zero” and “cipher” frequently arose – with a discussion of the interrelationship between US national defence issues and American medical research.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
1 Tracy C. Davis, Stages of Emergency: Cold War Nuclear Civil Defense (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), 23.
2 Daniel Cordle, States of Suspense: The Nuclear Age, Postmodernism and United States Fiction and Prose (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008), 13.
3 Tom Engelhardt, The End of Victory Culture: Cold War America and the Disillusioning of a Generation (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007; first published 1995), 9.
4 “Film on Atom War Bad for Children,” New York Times, 21 November 1952, 329; cited in Cordle, 48.
5 Ben Williamson, “Systems, Signs, and Pragmatism in Recent American Fiction,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis (University of the West of England, 2007), 85.
6 Isaac, Joel, “The Human Sciences in the Cold War,” Historical Journal, 50, 3 (2007), 725–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 728.
7 Ibid., 746.
8 Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (New York: Hyperion, 2007), 31.
9 See, for example, Robert Kaplan, The Nothing that Is: A Natural History of Zero (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000); and Charles Seife, Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea (London: Souvenir Press, 2000).
10 Paul Starr, The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982), 284.
11 J. Edgar Hoover, Masters of Deceit (New York: Henry Holt, 1958), 168.
12 Harold D. Lasswell, Psychopathology and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930), 240–67.
13 Gregory Zilboorg, “Out of Fear and Anguish,” New York Times, 6 May 1951, Book Review, 4.
14 Ellen Herman, The Romance of American Psychology (Berkeley: University of California Press), 124. See also Dee Garrison, From Duck and Cover to Duct Tape: The Myth of Civil Defense in the Nuclear Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
15 Psychiatry and Public Affairs: Reports and Symposia of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (Chicago: Aldane Publishing, 1966), 377–78.
16 Ibid., 394–96.
17 Robert K. Plumb, “Parley Stresses Science in Army,” New York Times, 28 June 1959, 4.
18 Christopher Simpson, ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War (New York: The New Press, 1998), xvii.
19 Albert Deutsch, The Shame of the States (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1948), 166.
20 See Eileen Welsome, The Plutonium Files: America's Secret Experiments in the Cold War (New York: Random House, 1999).
21 See Oliver Cope, “The Burn Problem,” in E. C. Andrus et al., eds., Advances in Military Medicine, Volume I (Boston: Little, Brown, 1948), 149–58.
22 Susan E. Lederer, “Darkened by the Shadow of the Atom: Burn Research in 1950s America,” in Wolfgang U. Eckart, ed., Man, Medicine, and the State: The Human Body as an Object of Government Sponsored Medical Research in the 20th Century (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2006), 267.
23 Ibid., 273. Lederer points out that the RKO film Experiment Alcatraz (Edward L. Cahn, 1950) stresses the voluntary nature of radiation experiments, carried out in return for freedom.
24 James H. Capshew, Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 169–71.
25 Dwight D. Eisenhower to William Benton, 1 May 1953, cited in Kenneth Osgood, Total Cold War: Eisenhower's Secret Propaganda Battle at Home and Abroad (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006), 77.
26 See Moreno, Jonathan D., “‘The Only Feasible Means’: The Pentagon's Ambivalent Relationship with the Nuremberg Code,” The Hastings Center Report, 26, 5 (Sept.–Oct. 1996), 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 John C. Flanagan, “Psychology in the World Emergency,” in John C. Flanagan et al., eds., Psychology in the World Emergency (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1952), 14.
28 Lori Lyn Bogle, The Pentagon's Battle for the American Mind: The Early Cold War (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 2004), 94.
29 See Michael Nelson, War of the Black Heavens: The Battles of Western Broadcasting in the Cold War (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1997).
30 Mead, Margaret, “The Social Responsibility of the Anthropologist,” Journal of Higher Education, 33, 1 (Jan. 1962), 7Google Scholar; Schlesinger, Arthur Jr., “Psychological Warfare: Can It Sell Freedom?”, The Reporter, 8, 7 (31 March 1953), 9–12Google Scholar, 11; Robert T. Holt and Robert W. van de Velde, Strategic Psychological Operations and American Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), v. See also Murray Dyer, The Weapon on the Wall: Rethinking Psychological Warfare (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1959).
31 US Department of Army, Joint Strategic Plans Committee, JSPC 862/3, 2 Aug. 1948, US National Archives; cited in Christopher Simpson, Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare, 1945–1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 12.
32 Ibid., 13.
33 See Carol Rutz, A Nation Betrayed: Secret Cold War Experiments Performed on Our Children and other Innocent People (Grass Lake, MI: Fidelity Publishing, 2001), xiii–xv. For the place of cancer in the Cold War see Gerald Kutcher, Contested Medicine: Cancer Research and the Military (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009); and Ellen Leopold, Under the Radar: Cancer and the Cold War (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009).
34 See Moreno, 11–19.
35 “Mammoth Cave, Washington, D.C.,” New York Times, 27 June 1943, Sunday Magazine, 8.
36 Norman Mailer, Armies of the Night (New York: Plume, 1994; first published 1968), 135, 125. For a discussion of Mailer's masculinist rhetoric see K. A. Cuordileone, Manhood and American Political Culture in the Cold War (New York: Routledge, 2005), 163–64, 190–91.
37 Interview with Rothko and Gottlieb, 13 April 1943, cited in Clifford Ross, ed., Abstract Expressionism: Creators and Critics (New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1990), 212.
38 Diana Preston, Before the Fallout: From Marie Curie to Hiroshima (New York: Walker & Company, 2005), 312. See also Paul S. Boyer, By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994; first published 1985).
39 Ed Murrow, See It Now conversation with Oppenheimer, Institute of Advanced Study, Princeton University (CBS, 4 Jan. 1955). The extended forty-five-minute discussion was intended for use in universities, but edited for broadcast. The complete recording is available in the Motion Picture Reading Room, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
40 Medical Aspects of Nuclear Radiation (Cascade Picture, 1950), included in Atomic War Bride and This is Not a Test (Something Weird Video, 2002).
41 The Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, 1947–1975 (Japanese National Institute of Health of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1978), 17.
42 National Research Council, “Genetic Effects of the Atomic Bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” Science, 106, 275 (10 Oct. 1947), 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar; republished in James Y. Neel and William J. Schull, The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991), 9.
43 Neel and Schull, 2.
44 See “Medical Aspects of Nuclear Energy” (Armed Forces Special Weapons Project, National Military Establishment, 1949), the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
45 Ibid., 13–14.
46 Robert Jay Lifton, “Psychological Effects of the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima: The Theme of Death,” Daedalus (Summer 1963), 462–97.
47 Robert Jay Lifton, Life in Death: Survivors of Hiroshima (New York: Random House, 1967), 23.
48 See Ron Robin, The Making of the Cold War Enemy: Culture and Politics in the Military–Industrial Complex (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 101–23; and Harvey M. Weinstein, Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc., 1990), xviii, 132.
49 Segal, Henry A., “Initial Psychiatric Findings of Recently Repatriated Prisoners of War,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 5 (Nov. 1954), 358–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 358. See also Schein, Edgar H., “The Chinese Indoctrination Program for Prisoners of War: A Study of Attempted ‘Brainwashing’,” Psychiatry, 19 (1956), 149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 See Lifton, Robert Jay, “Home by Ship: Reaction Patterns of American Prisoners of War Repatriated from North Korea,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 10 (April 1954), 732–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 Robert Jay Lifton, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of “Brainwashing” in China (New York: Norton, 1961), 5.
52 Ibid., 228.
53 There are other arguments to suggest that Western POWs in Korea behaved no differently to those captured in other wars, as initial disorientation and blankness of response often wore off after repatriation. But Lori Bogle and other critics counter this by pointing to the twenty-one American prisoners (as well as one British and over three hundred South Korean POWs) who made the decision to stay in communist China after being released. See Bogle, The Pentagon's Battle for the American Mind, 119–26. Eisenhower dismissed these experiences as a symptom of inadequate preparation for war and encouraged the military to raise patriotism by pressing for a Code of Conduct in 1955.
54 Lifton, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, 421.
55 Ibid., 425.
56 Ibid., 447–48.
57 See Zur, Offer, “On Nuclear Attitudes and Psychic Numbing: Overview and Critique,” Contemporary Social Psychology, 14, 2 (June 1990), 96–118.Google Scholar
58 Ibid., 458.
59 Psychiatry and Public Affairs, 398.
60 Harold D. Lasswell, National Security and Individual Freedom (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951), 1. For CIA mind-control projects see John Marks, The Search for the “Manchurian Candidate”: The CIA and Mind Control (New York: Times Books, 1979), 21–33.
61 John H. Popham, “Atom Held ‘Feeble’ in Light of Science,” New York Times, 11 Oct. 1949, 33. Naomi Klein uses the phrase “science of fear” in The Shock Doctrine, 38–46.
62 Jung interview broadcast on Face to Face: Professor Jung (BBC, 1959). Lifton, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, 459.
63 Norman Mailer, “The White Negro” (1957), in Advertisements for Myself (London: Flamingo, 1994; first published 1959), 282.