² Andrews, J., History of the War with America, France and Spain, commencing in 1775 and ending in 1783 (4 vols., London, 1785), vol. 1, p. 4.Google Scholar

³ Chalmers had practised as a lawyer in the city of Baltimore for a number of years, and so was well qualified to comment on American topics. In his writings on the colonies, however, he seems to have lacked stamina. An Introduction to the History of the Revolt of the American Colonies (London, 1782)Google Scholar, failed to carry the story beyond the age of George I. Similarly incomplete were the Political Annals of the Present United Colonies from their Settlement to the Peace of 1763 (London, 1780)Google Scholar, which ended with the Revolution of 1688.

⁴ Andrews, , History of the War, vol. 1, p. 12.Google Scholar

⁵ Dictionary of National Biography.

⁶ Gordon, W., History of the Rise, Progress and Establishment of the Independence of the United States of America including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies (4 vols., London, 1788).Google Scholar

⁷ Ibid., vol. 4, pp. 402–3.

⁸ Ibid., vol. 1, p. 167.

⁹ Belsham, W., Memoirs of the Reign of George III (5 vols., London, 1795).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 152–60.

¹¹ Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 243–4; vol. 2, pp. 293–4.

¹² Adolphus, J., History of England, 1760–1783 (3 vols., London, 1802).Google Scholar

¹³ Dictionary of National Biography.

¹⁴ Edinburgh Review, vol. 1, p. 318.Google ScholarAdolphus, , History, vol. 1, pp. vii–ix.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 159–60, 343.

¹⁶ Ibid., pp. 203–10.

¹⁷ Ibid., vol. 2, p. 295.

¹⁸ Ibid., vol. 1, p. ix. Concerning George III, Adolphus suggested that the King had always ‘sought the love of his subjects through the means of public spirit and private virtue’, tempering his desire ‘to preserve from degradation the authority he inherits with a firm and just regard to our constitution and liberties’.

¹⁹ Bisset, R., History of the Reign of George III (6 vols., London, 1803).Google Scholar

²⁰ Dictionary of National Biography.

²¹ He was especially critical of Lord North's punitive measures introduced into Parliament in the spring of 1774, History of George III, vol. 2, p. 191.Google Scholar

²² Ibid., vol. 3, pp. 141–3, 331–2. Stedman, C., The History of the Origin, Progress and Termination of the American War (2 vols., London, 1794).Google ScholarBeatson, R., Naval and Military Memoirs of Great Britain from 1727–1783 (6 vols., London, 1804).Google Scholar

²³ These developments are considered more fully in Butterfield, H., George III and the Historians (London, 1957), pp. 95–118.Google Scholar

²⁴ James, Earl Waldegrave, Memoirs from 1754 to 1758 (London, 1821).Google Scholar The next year appeared Walpole's, HoraceMemoirs of the Last Ten years of the Reign of George II (2 vols., London, 1822).Google Scholar

²⁵ Taylor, W. S. and Pringle, J. H. (eds.), Correspondence of William Pitt, Earl of Chatham (4 vols., London, 1838–1840).Google ScholarRussell, Lord J. (ed.), Correspondence of John, Fourth Duke of Bedford (3 vols., London, 1842–1846).Google ScholarCharles, Earl Fitzwilliam and SirBouke, Richard, Correspondence of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke between the year 1744 and 1797 (4 vols., London, 1844).Google ScholarThomas, George, Earl of Albemarle, Memoirs of the Marquis of Rockingham and his Contemporaries (2 vols., London, 1852).Google ScholarSmith, W. J. (ed.), The Grenville Papers (4 vols., London, 1852–1853).Google Scholar

²⁶ Walpole, H., Memoirs of the Reign of George III (4 vols., London, 1845).Google Scholar

²⁷ Mahon, Lord, History of England from the Peace of Utrecht to the Peace of Versailles, 1713–1783 (7 vols., London, 1836–1854).Google Scholar

²⁸ Ibid., vol. 5, pp. 1, 15.

²⁹ Ibid., p. 171.

³⁰ Edinburgh Review, vol. 56, p. 499.Google Scholar

³¹ Because of ill health, Green put down most of his ideas in a single volume entitled Short History of the English People, which appeared in 1874, before returning to his more ambitious History of the English People (4 vols., London, 1877–1880).Google Scholar

³² Sir Trevelyan, G. O., The American Revolution (3 vols., London, 1899–1907).Google Scholar Trevelyan produced two more volumes entitled George III and Charles James Fox (London, 1912–1914)Google Scholar, with which he completed his study of the period. A new edition of the first three volumes has been produced by R. B. Morris (New York, 1964). References in this article are to that edition.

³³ Dictionary of National Biography.

³⁴ Green, , History, vol. 4, p. 201.Google Scholar

³⁵ Trevelyan, , Revolution, p. 46.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibid., pp. 14–18.

³⁷ Ibid., p. 201.

³⁸ The work, however, was popular in the United States, Dictionary of National Biography.

³⁹ Massey, W., A History of England during the Reign of George III (4 vols., London, 1855–1863).Google ScholarLecky, W. E. H., History of England in the Eighteenth Century (6 vols., London, 1878–1890).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Massey, , History, vol. 1, pp. 65, 67Google Scholar; vol. 2, p. 133.

⁴¹ Dictionary of National Biography.

⁴² Trevelyan, , Revolution, pp. 11, 13.Google Scholar

⁴³ Lecky, , History, vol. 3, pp. 346–7, 358–60.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ibid., pp. 273, 293–6.

⁴⁵ Ibid., p. 344.

⁴⁶ Ibid., p. 443.

⁴⁷ Hunt, W., History of England from the Accession of George III to the Close of Pitt's First Administration, 1760–1801 (London, 1905), pp. 3–10.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ The Cambridge Modern History (Cambridge, 1905), vol. 7Google Scholar, The United States, pp. 151–2.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ SirRobertson, C. G., England under the Hanoverians (London, 1911).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Marks, J., England and America, 1763–1783 (London, 1907), vol. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar

⁵¹ They have not apparently been the only school of armchair historians. See Ben-Israel, H., English Historians and the French Revolution (Cambridge, 1968).Google Scholar

⁵² Mumby, F. A., George III and the American Revolution: The Beginnings (London, 1923).Google Scholar The most important works of the Imperial school, under the leadership of C. M. Andrews, to have appeared at this time were Beer, G. L., British Colonial Policy, 1754–1763 (New York, 1907)Google Scholar; Andrews, C. M., The Colonial Period of American History (New York, 1912)Google Scholar; Dickerson, O. M., American Colonial Government, 1696–1765 (Cleveland, 1912)Google Scholar; Alvord, C. W., The Mississippi Valley in British Politics (2 vols., Cleveland, 1917)Google Scholar; Andrews, C. M., The Colonial Background of the American Revolution (New Haven, 1923).Google Scholar The next year appeared Osgood's, H. L.The American Colonies in the Eighteenth Century (4 vols., New York, 1924).Google Scholar But even ten years later, the situation had not much improved, according to H. Hale Bellot, in a survey on the literature of the colonial period prior to the Revolution. ‘The story thus revealed by the labours of recent American scholarship is almost entirely omitted from our text-books’, Bellot, H. Hale, ‘The mainland colonies in the eighteenth century’, History, 17, 350.Google Scholar

⁵³ Egerton, H. E., The Causes and Character of the American Revolution (Oxford, 1923).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Ibid., pp. 1–35.

⁵⁵ SirFortescue, J. (ed.), The Correspondence of King George III from 1760–1783 (6 vols., London, 1927–1928), vol. 1, pp. xiv–xvi.Google Scholar In his earlier History of the British Army (London, 1899), vols. 1–2Google Scholar, Fortescue had shown himself to be no admirer of the Whigs.

⁵⁶ SirNamier, L. B., The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (London, 1929)Google Scholar; England in the Age of the American Revolution (London, 1930).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Christie, I. R., The End of North's Ministry (London, 1958).Google Scholar In an essay on George III, Cross Roads of Power (London, 1962), p. 128Google Scholar, Namier did go so far as to assert that the King was ‘absolutely correct when saying his attachment to Parliamentary rights had caused the difficulties in America’.

⁵⁸ Robson, E., The American Revolution in its Military and Political Aspects, 1763–1783 (Manchester, 1955), p. 10.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Ibid., p. 51.

⁶⁰ Donoughue, B., British Politics and the American Revolution, 1773–1775 (London, 1963).Google Scholar

⁶¹ This is also the conclusion of Beloff, M., The Debate on the American Revolution (Oxford, 1949).Google Scholar

⁶² Butterfield, H., George III and the Historians (London, 1957), p. 238.Google Scholar

⁶³ The failure of the Namierites to follow up their work is commented upon by Morgan, E. S. in his article ‘Revisions in need of revising’, William and Mary Quarterly, 14, 5–7.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Mackesy, P., The War for America, 1775–1783 (London, 1964).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Pole, J. R., Political Representation in England and the Origins of the American Republic (London, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁶ SirSeeley, J. R., The Expansion of England (London, 1925), p. 69.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Harlow, V. T., The Founding of the Second British Empire, 1763–1793 (2 vols., London, 1952–1964).Google ScholarMarshall, P. J. ‘The First and Second British Empires: a question of demarcation’, History, 49, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarFieldhouse, D. K., The Colonial Empires: a comparative survey from the eighteenth century (London, 1966).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Wright, E., The Fabric of Freedom, 1763–1800 (New York, 1961).Google Scholar Another useful book of this kind is that by Christie, I. R., Crisis of Empire: Great Britain and the American Colonies, 1754–1783 (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Wright, E., Washington and the American Revolution (London, 1957)Google Scholar; Cunliffe, M., George Washington: Man and Monument (London, 1959).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ For a useful summary of the different approaches to the Revolution by both British and American writers, see the introduction to Wright, E., Causes and Consequences of the American Revolution (Chicago, 1966).Google Scholar