Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:16:30.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Between the Lines of Billy Budd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

W. D. Redfern
Affiliation:
W. D. Redfern is Professor of French Studies at the University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 2AA.

Extract

Melville thinks he does, though he cannot speak quite so confidently of the rest of us. The Navy of Billy Budd is a heterocosm, a separate, self-contained and self-regulating world. The tale of the doomed, angelic foretopman begins with a swaggering parade. Billy enjoys his local triumph, to be followed in due course by his tragedy and his partly victorious aftermath. Neither he nor his black counterpart in the opening pages belongs to the nautical tradition of “Billy-be-Damn” (no doubt a more decorous avatar of Bollicky Bill). Their twin asexual cocksureness receives apparently sexless worship from their fellows, for whom they are first among equals. Perhaps because we see no battle action in this story, a curious passivity seems to reign. Billy is a “cynosure”: a static magnet for admiration, and later a hapless target for malevolence. Although “to deal in double-meanings and insinuations of any sort was quite foreign to his nature” and though he is hardly conscious of the pun involved when he bids farewell to his first ship, the “Rights of Man,” his creator Melville stands in for him in this function. “Indirection” is Melville's preferred mode, He exploits his impeccable hero as the locus of double dealing, innuendo, lies, ambiguity, treachery, perverted history, and finally popular legend. Simple goodness, and complex evil, may be freaks of human nature, ultimately unfathomable alike, but Melville refuses the passivity of his sailors, and intervenes to make some sense of mystery. As Polonius said to Reynaldo: “With assays of bias, By indirections find directions out.” Like God in the Portuguese proverb dear to Claudel, Melville seeks to write straight in crooked lines. Since the pun, like irony and oxymoron, is an oblique mode, he appeals to its devious resources in his search.

The naval world provides a firm basis for this weaving approach, since it is governed by clear lines of demarcation: hierarchical vetoes, territorial imperatives, disciplinary codes. “Life is not a game with the sailor, demanding the long head; no intricate game of chess where few moves are made in straight-forwardness, and ends are attained by indirection.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In gay slang, which also favours the deviancy of puns, angel means homosexual, Adam (to whom Billy is likened) a first partner, and bud a young latent homosexual.

2 See Hayford, Harrison and Sealts, Merton M. J, eds., Billy Budd (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962), p. 170Google Scholar.

3 Rosenberry, Edward H., Melville and the Comic Spirit (New York: Octagon, 1969), p. 155Google Scholar.

4 Lindberg, Gary, The Confidence Man in American Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 25Google Scholar.

5 Ruthven, K. K., The Conceit (London: Methuen, 1969), p. 38Google Scholar.

6 See Franklin, H. Bruce, The Wake of the Gods (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1963), p. 195Google Scholar.

7 Howe, Irving, Politics and the Novel (Cleveland: Meridian, 1957), p. 83Google Scholar.

8 Feidelson, Charles Jr, ed., Moby Dick (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964), pp. 195–96Google Scholar.

9 Melville, Herman, Pierre, or The Ambiguities (New York: Grove Press, 1957), p. 199Google Scholar.

10 Blair, John, “Puns and Equivocations in Melville's The Confidence Man,” American Transcendental Quarterly, 22 (1974), 94Google Scholar.

11 Franklin, H. Bruce, ed., The Confidence Man (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967), p. 171Google Scholar.

12 Blair, p. 92.

13 Rosenberry, p. 41.

14 Ruthven, p. 45.

15 Ibid., p. 8.