¹ Eisenhower, Dwight D., “Address to the 1957 National Governors' Conference,” in The Politics of American Federalism, ed., Eleazer, Daniel J. (Lexington, Mass: D. C. Heath, 1969), 188–93.Google Scholar

² Weyrich, Paul M., “The Reagan Revolution That Wasn't,” Policy Review, (Summer 1987), 53Google Scholar

³ National Governors' Association (NGA), Making America Work: Productive People, Productive Policies, “Jobs, Growth and Competitiveness,” Washington, DC, 07 1987, xvii.Google Scholar

⁴ White, Leonard D., The States and the Nation (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1953), 3.Google Scholar

⁵ Sanford, Terry, Storm Over the States (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967), I, 20–24.Google Scholar

⁶ Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR), Regulatory Federalism: Policy, Process, Impact, and Reform (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984), 246.Google Scholar

⁷ Ford and Carter proposed several block grants but none were enacted. On rising federal expenditures, see Dilger, Robert J., “The Expansion and Centralization of American Governmental Functions,” in American Intergovernmental Relations Today: Perspectives and Controversies, ed., Dilger, R. J. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986), 25Google Scholar; also, Shannon, John, “Federal and State-Local Spenders Go Their Separate Ways,”Google Scholaribid, 181–82.

⁸ Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 18, 4, 02 1, 1982, 79–80.Google ScholarSpecial Analyses, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 1987, H-2. Also, see Peterson, George E., et al. , The Reagan Block Grants: What Have We Learned? (Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1986), ch. 1.Google Scholar

⁹ Council of State Governments (CSG), “State of the States, 1985,” Address by Robb, Governor Charles of Virginia, in Book of the States, 1986–1987 (Lexington, KY: CSG, 1986), 1–2.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Democratic Governors' Association (DGA), Facing the Facts: The Democratic Governors' View from the States (Washington, DC, 1984), 91–98, 111–16.Google Scholar

¹¹ CSG, “State of the States, 1985.”

¹² U.S. News & World Report, “The Can-Do Mood in the States,” 30 12 1985, 6 01 1986, 32–40.Google Scholar

¹³ Broder, David S., “Conservative – and Activist – Governors,” The Washington Post, 25 02 1987.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Doyle, Denis P. and Hartle, Terry W., “The States Are Leading As Washington Wallows,”Google Scholaribid, 5 Sept. 1985.

¹⁵ Aronson, J. Richard and Hilley, John L., Financing State and Local Governments, 4th edn. (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1986), 24–26Google Scholar; also Burns, James M., Peltason, J. W., and Cronin, Thomas E., State and Local Politics: Government By the People, 3 rd edn. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981), 239–40.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Reeves, Mavis Mann, “Look Again At State Capacity,” American Intergovernmental Relations Today, ch. 6.Google Scholar

¹⁷ CSG, “The State of the States, 1973,” Message of Governor Daniel J. Evans of Washington, Washington, DC, 1974.Google Scholar

¹⁸ ACIR, State and Local Roles in the Federal System (Washington, DC: ACIR, 1982), 3.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Sabato, Larry, Goodbye to Good-time Charlie: The American Governorship Transformed, 2nd edn. (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1983)Google Scholar, see especially chs. 2 and 6, 198–201; also, Reeves, “Look Again At State Capacity,” 148–53.Google Scholar

²⁰ ibid, 154–55, 157; also, Nathan, Richard P., “Institutional Change Under Reagan,” in Perspectives On the Reagan Years, ed. Palmer, John L. (Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1986), 139Google Scholar

²¹ Treadway, J. M., Public Policy Making in America (NY: Praeger, 1985), 1.Google Scholar

²² On the NGA, see Sabato, , Goodbye to Good-time Charlie, 169–75.Google Scholar

²³ Dilger, , “The Expansion and Centralization of American Governmental Functions,” 20–21Google Scholar; Council of State Planning Agencies, “About the Council of State Planning Agencies,” Washington, DC: CSPA, nd., ca. 1984, I; Education Commission of the States, Fact Sheet, Washington, DC, 1987.

²⁴ For an extended list, see Kinsley, Michael, “The Withering Away of the States,” in Gittell, Marilyn, ed., State Politics and the New Federalism (New York: Longman, 1986), 66–67.Google Scholar

²⁵ Doyle, and Hartle, , “The States Are Leading…”Google Scholar

²⁶ Weyrich, , “The Reagan Revolution That Wasn't,” 52–53Google Scholar; quoted in Aim, Richard et al. , “Move Over Capitol Hill, The Action's Back Home,” U.S. News & World Report, 06 9, 1986, 22.Google Scholar

²⁷ Nathan, , “Institutional Change Under Reagan,” 1986, 141.Google Scholar

²⁸ The National Commission on Excellence in Education, “A Nation At Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform,” A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education (U.S. Dept. of Education, Washington, DC, 19 04, 1983), 1–3.Google Scholar See also, The Twentieth Century Fund, “Report on the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Elementary and Secondary Education Policy” (New York: 1983).Google Scholar

²⁹ See The Nation Responds: Recent Efforts To Improve Education (Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, 05 1984)Google Scholar, particularly the section entitled, “State Initiatives,” and 15. Also, Kirst, Michael W., Who Controls Our Schools: American Values in Conflict (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1984), 126–29Google Scholar, chapter 2. Almost every recent study on America's international competitiveness gives education high priority. See, Global Competition: The New Reality. President's Commission on Industrial Competitiveness (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985), 1, 56–57Google Scholar, and Johnston, William B., Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the 21st Century (Indianapolis: Hudson Institute, 1987), xxvi–xxvii, 115–17.Google Scholar

³⁰ National Governors' Association, Time for Results: The Governors' 1991 Report on Education (Washington, DC, 07 1986).Google Scholar

³¹ NGA, Results In Education: 1987 (Washington, DC, 07 1987).Google ScholarThe Washington Post, 16 03 1988, 4.Google Scholar

³² See, California State Department of Education, “Accountability for California Public Schools,” Sacramento, 1986Google Scholar; “Miami Schools: Laboratory for Major Changes,” The New York Times, 10 01 1988, 1.Google Scholar“Summary of Major Actions Taken by the New York Legislature in 1986,”Google Scholaribid, 10 July 1986. The Washington Post, 29 05, 1988, 8.Google Scholar

³³ See Bailey, Stephen K., “Political Coalitions for Public Education,” Daedalus (Summer 1981).Google Scholar On business-education cooperation, see Hechinger, Fred M., “Turnaround for the Schools?”, Harvard Business Review (01/02 1985).Google Scholar The CED acknowledges the states' role in its two most recent reports on education, Investing in Our Children: Business and the Public Schools (New York and Washington, DC: CED, 1985)Google Scholar, and Children In Need: Investment Strategies for the Educationally Disadvantaged (New York and Washington, DC: CED, 1987).Google Scholar

³⁴ The Nation Responds, 15Google Scholar; also, The Washington Post, 15 09 1987Google Scholar, and Doyle, Denis P. and Hartle, Terry W., Excellence in Education: The States Take Charge (Washington, DC: AEI, 1985).Google Scholar

³⁵ Vaughn, Roger, Pollard, Robert, Dyer, Barbara, The Wealth of States (Washington, DC: CSPA, 1984), 5Google Scholar; NGA, Making America Work: Productive People, Productive Policies, “Jobs, Growth and Competitiveness” (Washington, DC: NGA, 1987), v.Google Scholar

³⁶ Vaughn, et al. , Wealth of States, v.Google Scholar

³⁷ Corporation for Enterprise Development, Making the Grade: The Development's Report Card on the States (Washington, DC: CFED, 1987), ch. 1Google Scholar; NGA, Policy Positions, 1986–1987 (Washington, DC: NGA, 1987), 236–43.Google Scholar

³⁸ Leepson, Marc, “Keeping Business At Home,” Nation's Business, 05 1987, 68Google Scholar; also, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, “Florida: Poised for A Surge,” Economic Review (02 1983), 7–10.Google Scholar

³⁹ Leepson, , “Keeping Business At Home,” 67–70Google Scholar; also, Corporation for Enterprise Development, Making the Grade, 3–6Google Scholar; and Novack, Janet, “Supply Side Success Story,” Forbes, 17 11 1986, 144–53.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ GovernorCuomo, Mario M., “Message To The Legislature,” Albany, NY, 9 01 1985, 14–27Google Scholar; and “Message To The Legislature,” Albany, NY, 6 01 1988, 25–26.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Vaughn, Roger, “Creating Opportunity: Reducing Dependency Through Economic Development” (Washington, DC: CSPA, Aug. 1984), 10–11.Google Scholar

⁴² The New York Times, 4 10 1987, 45.Google Scholar

⁴³ Broder, , “Conservative – and Activist – Governors.”Google Scholar

⁴⁴ NGA, Making America Work, “Bringing Down the Barriers,” and “Jobs, Growth and Competitiveness” (Washington, DC: NGA, 1987), vi–x, 18.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ The New York Times, 7 07 1986, 1.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Lamar, Jacob V. Jr, “From Welfare To Workfare,” Time, 3 02 1986, 16–18.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Barnes, Fred, “Move Over Mario,” The New Republic, 14 04 1986Google Scholar; NGA, “Bringing Down the Barriers,” 19.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Kaus, Mickey, “The Work Ethic State,” The New Republic, 7 07 1986, 22–23Google Scholar; Lamar, , “From Welfare to Workfare,” 17.Google Scholar See also, “Four Efforts to Battle Poverty,” Scholastic Update, 23 03 1987, 25Google Scholar; NGA, “Bringing Down the Barriers,” 26.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Chua-Eoan, Howard G., “Welfare-Plus in Washington,” Time, 19 01 1987, 23.Google ScholarThe New York Times, 25 10 1987, 1.Google Scholar For criticism of workfare, see, e.g., Kaus, , “The Work Ethic State,” and Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Hearing, “Workfare Versus Welfare” (Washington, DC: GPO, 23 04 1986), 2–23.Google Scholar The Manpower Demonstration Research Corp., e.g., found Illinois' programme “deficient” and unproductive due to underfunding, in The Washington Post, 2 12 1987, 23.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ On the Administration's GROW plan, see Whitman, David, “The Key To Welfare Reform,” Atlantic Monthly (06 1987), 24–25.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Joint Economic Committee, “Workfare Versus Welfare.” For Moynihan's plan and remarks, see The New York Times, 19, 26 07, 1987Google Scholar, both 1; Clinton, Bill, “Welfare Reform As an Investment,” The Washington Post, 10 12 1987.Google Scholar

⁵² NGA, “Bringing Down the Barriers,” 10–11, 16–17Google Scholar; Clinton, , “Welfare Reform As an Investment.”Google Scholar

⁵³ Despite new federalism, Washington's funding for health care increased in constant dollars during the 1980s, in Peterson, Paul E., Rabe, Barry G., and Wong, Kenneth K., When Federalism Works (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1986), 221Google Scholar; Wilson, Florence A. and Neuhauser, Duncan, Health Services in the United States (Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger, 1985), 2nd edn., 131–33.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Ibid., 227–36.

⁵⁵ Aronson, and Hilley, , Financing State and Local Governments, 70–71.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid., 71. Califano, Joseph A. Jr, America's Health Care Revolution (New York: Random House, 1986), 151, 158.Google ScholarPubMed

⁵⁷ Starr, Paul, The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982), 398–99.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Lamm, Richard D., “Health Care: An Era of Hard Choices,” DGA Facing the Facts, 21–27.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Starr, , The Social Transformation of American Medicine, 399Google Scholar; Califano, , America's Health Care Revolution, 153.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Ibid., also Lamm, , “Health Care: An Era of Hard Choices,” 25–26.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Califano, , America's Health Care Revolution, 154, 160.Google Scholar

⁶² Lamm, , “Health Care: An Era of Hard Choices,” 25Google Scholar; also Doyle, and Hartle, , “The States Are Leading…”Google Scholar

⁶³ NGA, Building Affordable Long Term Care Alternatives; Integrating State Policy (Washington, DC: NGA, 1987), i–iii.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Ibid., xii–xiv, vi.

⁶⁵ Ibid., 3.

⁶⁶ Iglehart, John K., “Falling Through the Safety Net,” The Washington Post, Health Sect., 2 12 1986.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ NGA, “Broadening Medicaid Coverage of Pregnant Women and Children: State Policy Responses” (Washington, DC: NGA, 02, 1987), i–ii, 31–36.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Massachusett's plan described in The Washington Post, 10 09 1987, 15Google Scholar; also, The New York Times, 22 11 1987, 1.Google ScholarThe Washington Post, 14 04 1988, 16, and 26 04, “Editorial.”Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Califano, , America's Health Care Revolution, 214–15Google Scholar; also, “Summary of Major Actions Taken by the New York Legislature in 1986,” in The New York Times, 10 07 1986.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Proffer, Lanny, “Weathering the Storm of Liability Litigation,” State Legislatures (Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures, 11/12 1985), 15.Google Scholar

⁷¹ As reported in The New York Times, 22 09 1987, By, 30 09 1987, 18Google Scholar; The Washington Post, 9 09 1987, 3, 1 01 1988, 11.Google Scholar

⁷² Treadway, , Public Policy Making in American States, 1, 182–83.Google Scholar “National policy can also be imposed on states and localities,” noted Schurr, Sam H. et al. , Energy in America's Future: The Choices Before Us (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979), 466.Google Scholar On the importance of professionalized policymaking, see Peterson, et al. When Federalism Works, 20.Google Scholar

⁷³ Etzioni, Amitai, An Immodest Agency: Rebuilding America Before the 21st Century (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984), 174–75.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Barnes, Fred, “The Death of the Reagan Presidency,” The New Republic, 22 12 1986.Google Scholar The White House appeared paralyzed to Broder, “Conservative- and Activist-Governors,” and Doyle and Hartle, “The States Are Leading.…” An editorial by the Washington Post entitled “Paralysis” described federal inaction on budget matters, 13 09 1987.Google Scholar Also, a number of political analysts, such as Etzioni, opined that “The Party, Like Reagan's Era, Is Over,” in The New York Times, 16 02 1987.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Weyrich, , “The Reagan Revolution That Wasn't,” 50, 53.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ E.g., according to The Washington Post – ABC News Poll conducted in April 1987, participants named Nixon, Carter and Reagan most frequently when asked: “In your lifetime which president did the worse job?” See The Washington Post, 22 04 1987, 1.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr, The Cycles of American History (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1986), 284–85.Google Scholar See also, Schlesinger, , “The Imperial Temptation,” The New Republic, 16 03 1987, 17–18.Google ScholarNeustadt, Richard E., Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership (NY: Wiley, 1960), 193.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ See Reeves, , “Look Again At State Capacity,” 144–45Google Scholar; poll results reported in Lipset, Seymour Martin and Schneider, William, The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor and Government in the Public Mind (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1987) rev. edn., 82–83.Google Scholar Americans found state government more trustworthy and far less wasteful of public funds than the national government in a recent ACIR poll conducted 6–14 June 1987, as reported in The Washington Post, 8 09 1987, 21Google Scholar; Sabato, , Goodbye to Good-time Charlie, 80.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Peterson, et al. , When Federalism Works, 26.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ On Congress' frustration with itself, see e.g., Hackler, Tom, “What's Gone Wrong With the U.S. Senate?” American Politics, 01 1987, 7–11Google Scholar, Broder, David S., “Why Is America In Such A Sour Mood?” The Washington Post, 16 09 1987Google Scholar, and “Words, Not Actions, in the Senate,” The Economist, 3 10, 1987, 31.Google Scholar On revived Congressional activism, see e.g., The New York Times, 11 01 1987, 19Google Scholar, and The Washington Post, same day, 1.

⁸¹ NGA, “Jobs, Growth and Competitiveness,” 1–3.Google Scholar

⁸² The Project on the Federal Social Role, established in 1982, was comprised of distinguished present and former federal and state legislators, academicians and policy analysts. See Chisman, Forrest and Pifer, Alan, Government for the People: The Federal Social Role – What It Is, What It Should Be (New York: Norton, 1987), 9–14, 268.Google Scholar

⁸³ Cuomo, , “Message To The Legislature,” 1988, 3.Google Scholar National Governors' Association, “Restoring the Balance: State Leadership for America's Future,” A Background Paper, 21–23 02 1988, 4.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ See e.g., “Prototype State Constitution,” in State Government: CQ's Guide to Current Issues and Activities, 1987–1988 (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1987)Google Scholar, Appendix; and The Washington Post, 1 12 1987, 4.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ On the Commission's origins and purposes, see ibid, 12 Jan. 1988, 19, and Cuomo, , “Message To The Legislature,” 1988, 25.Google ScholarVice PresidentBush, George “scornfully” called it the “Cuomo Commission” in The Washington Post, 11 03 1988, 9.Google Scholar