Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:54:13.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stuart Hall's Discursive Turn

Review products

StuartHall, The Fateful Triangle: Race, Ethnicity, Nation, ed. KobenaMercer (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017, £21.95). Pp. 256. isbn978 0 6749 7652 8.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2019

JAY GARCIA*
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Literature, New York University. Email: [email protected].

Extract

Recalling his work as cofounder and contributor to Universities and Left Review, or the ULR group, in the lead-up to the founding of cultural studies during the 1950s, Stuart Hall noted that much of that work had to do with the United States. “In geopolitical terms we were of course neutralists, hostile to the politics emanating from the State Department in Washington,” Hall wrote, “but culturally we were nonetheless attracted by the vitality of American popular life, indeed to the domain of mass culture itself.” If the ULR group and similar collectives shared an “anxiety about the stupendous power of the booming consumer capitalism of post-war America,” they were also united by an appreciation for the ways the “vitality and raucousness of American culture certainly loosened England's tight-lipped, hierarchical class cultures and carried inside it possibilities – or the collective dream? – for a better future, which we felt was a serious political loss to deny.” Not unrelatedly, by the 1960s and 1970s, cultural studies and certain quarters of American intellectual life were proceeding along comparable tracks. Many American scholars and at least some working in cultural studies moved toward social history that emphasized the “hidden experiences of subordinated groups and classes.” Undertaken in concert with the new social movements of the 1960s and 1970s, this version of social history would ramify widely, furnishing the very questions and analytic habits of many fields, not least American studies.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and British Association for American Studies 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hall, Stuart, Familiar Stranger: A Life between Two Islands, with Schwarz, Bill (London: Allen Lane, 2017), 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid.

3 Johnson, Richard, “Entangled Histories: Introduction,” in Gray, Ann, Campnell, Jan, Erickson, Mark, Hanson, Stuart and Wood, Helen, eds., CCCS Selected Working Papers, Volume II (London: Routledge, 2008), 761–73Google Scholar, 762.

4 Ibid., 768.

5 Ibid., 769.

6 Hall, Stuart, Cultural Studies 1983: A Theoretical History, ed. Slack, Jennifer Daryl and Grossberg, Lawrence (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016), 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Hall, Stuart, The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left (London: Verso, 1988), 133Google Scholar.

8 Ibid.

9 Hall, Stuart, “Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity,” in Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, ed. Chen, Kuan-Hsing and Morley, David (London: Routledge, 1996), 411–40Google Scholar.

10 Ibid.

11 Burke, Kenneth, The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973Google Scholar; first published 1941), 399.

12 Hall, Stuart, “Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance by Race,” in Baker, Houston A Jr., Diawara, Manthia and Lindeborg, Ruth H., eds., Black British Cultural Studies: A Reader (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996), 1660Google Scholar, 53.

13 Ibid., 52.

14 Ibid., 57.

15 Ibid., 56, 55.

16 Hall, “Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity,” 440.

17 Moreiras, Alberto, The Exhaustion of Difference: The Politics of Latin American Cultural Studies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Bhabha, Homi, “‘The Beginning of Their Real Enunciation’: Stuart Hall and the Work of Culture,” Critical Inquiry, 42, 1 (Autumn 2015), 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 28, original emphasis.

19 Hall, Stuart, “Modernity and Difference: A Conversation between Stuart Hall and Sarat Maharaj,” in Hall, Stuart and Maharaj, Sarat, Annotations 6: Modernity and Difference, ed. Campbell, Sarah and Tawadros, Gilane (London: Institute of International Visual Arts, 1999), 3656Google Scholar, 40, 51.

20 See Gilroy, Paul, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; and Bhabha, Homi, The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994)Google Scholar.

21 Stuart Hall, “On Postmodernism and Articulation: An Interview with Stuart Hall,” ed. Lawrence Grossberg, in Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, 131–50, 150.

22 Stuart Hall, “Museums of Modern Art and the End of History,” in Hall and Maharaj, 8–23, 9.

23 Ibid.