No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
When, on his way back to Manhattan from Kennedy Airport where he has picked up his girlfriend Maria, Sherman McCoy, the protagonist of Tom Wolfe's The Bonfire of the Vanities, takes a wrong exit, he gets lost and ends up in the Bronx. This is Sherman's first meeting with the Bronx, and it turns out to be nothing less than a catastrophe. A wealthy Wall Street stockbroker with a very WASP background, Sherman McCoy has lived his life under conditions as remote from those of any child growing up in the Bronx as can possibly be. The distance between McCoy's Manhattan – that of his business address, Wall Street, as well as his private one, Fifth Avenue – and the Bronx may not be great in geographical terms; in economic and psychological terms, however, it is enormous. In the Bronx, McCoy encounters “the other” America, the poor, non-white, and violent America from which his sheltered background has successfully shielded him until he is well into his thirties. He, or rather his girlfriend Maria, runs down and mortally wounds a young black man – an accident for which later Sherman gets all the blame and is put to trial. Puzzled and frightened, Sherman does not quite know how to relate to the Bronx and to the accident, and it is Maria who finally has to enlighten and explain to him what it is all about:
Sherman, let me tell you something. There's two kinds a jungles. Wall Street is a jungle. You've heard that, haven't you? You know how to handle yourself in that jungle…. And then there's the other jungle. That's the one we got lost in the other night, in the Bronx…. You don't live in that jungle, Sherman, and you never have. You know what's in that jungle? People who are all the time crossing back and forth, back and forth, from this side of the law to the other side…. You don't know what that's like. You had a good upbringing. Laws weren't any kind of a threat to you. They were your laws, Sherman, people like you and your family's…. And let me tell you something else. Right there on the line everyody's an animal – the police, the judges, the criminals, everybody (p. 275).
1 All references are to Wolfe, Tom, The Bonfire of the Vanities (New York: Bantam Books, 1987).Google Scholar
2 Auerbach, Jerold S., Justice Without Law: Resolving Disputes Without Lawyers (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 115.Google Scholar
3 I have chosen this phrase with an eye to George Orwell's phrase, “newspeak,” from 1984. It refers to the very important role played in American society by the letter of the law, the legal system and lawyers. This role is so pervasive, I would argue, that it not only affects people's everyday lives, but also their consciousness, their way of thinking about and formulating social, political, moral, and cultural issues.
4 Lieberman, Jethro K., The Litigious Society (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 8.Google Scholar
5 Li, Victor H., Law Without Lawyers: A Comparative View of Law in China and the U.S. (Stanford, CA: The Portable Stanford, 1977), 9.Google Scholar
6 Rembar, Charles, The Law of the Land: The Evolution of Our Legal System (New York: Harper and Row, 1989), 116.Google Scholar
7 Friedman, Lawrence M., A History of American Law (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973), 14.Google Scholar
8 Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977), 11.Google Scholar
9 Friedman, , 94.Google Scholar
10 Horwitz, , 30.Google Scholar
11 Friedman, , 106–07.Google Scholar
12 Lieberman, , 13.Google Scholar
13 Auerbach, , 10.Google Scholar
14 Ibid., 35.
15 I have taken this figure and these examples from Lieberman, 4–5.
16 Auerbach, , 12.Google Scholar
17 Dahrendorf, Ralf, Law and Order (The Hamlyn Lectures, London: Stevens and Sons, 1985), 146.Google Scholar
18 Sartori, Giovanni, The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Vol. 11 (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1987), 325–26.Google Scholar
19 Lieberman explains the term in this way: “This term is used loosely. In a strict sense, a fiduciary is one who stands in a special relationship to another, as a trustee of an estate stands toward the estate's beneficiary.… It is possible to interpret much of the changing face of the law as an attempt to charge a variety of relationships with a fiduciary character: the trend toward a standard of strict liability from one of negligence in manufacturers' liability to purchasers and users, the increasingly broad sweep given by the courts to the ancient term fraud, industrial liability to the public for the effects of pollution, and so on” (20–21 n.).
20 Lieberman, , 7, 18, 24, 122, 190.Google Scholar
21 The Bonfire of the Vanities, 391, 48, 396, 586.Google Scholar
22 Cf. Sherman's description of Maria, “She's a gambler. She's not the type to play it safe. She likes to mix it up, and her game is – well, it's men. Your game is law, mine is investment, hers is men” (617–18).
23 Ibid., 400–01.
24 Ibid., 587, 676.
25 Ibid., 42, 44, 48.
26 See Rembar, , 321 and 405.Google Scholar
27 Auerbach, , 10, 34.Google Scholar
28 I am using “social contract” here in the sense of an “unspoken agreement to abide by certain elementary norms and accept the monopoly of violence on the part of a common power set up to protect these norms” (Dahrendorf, , 89Google Scholar).
29 The Bonfire of the Vanities, 7, 56, 86.Google Scholar
30 Ibid., 135, 186, 89, 136.
31 Ibid., 158.
32 Rembar, , 129.Google Scholar In this as well as the following two paragraphs, I am relying on Rembar, chs. 5, 13 and 14.
33 For a recent commentary on trial by jury, see In the Jury Box: Controversies in the Courtroom, ed. Wrightsman, Lawrence S., Kassin, Saul M. and Willis, Cynthia E.. (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1987).Google Scholar The four topics of this book are jury selection, jury bias, jury competence, and the recent Supreme Court decisions that reduce the size of juries and permit less-than-unanimous verdicts.
34 The Bonfire of the Vanities, 628–29, 636.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 132–33.
36 Ibid., 534–35.
37 Dahrendorf, , 150.Google Scholar
38 I am referring to Auerbach's Justice Without Law and Li's Law Without Lawyers. Both writers are of the opinion that “law begins where community ends” (Auerbach, , 5).Google Scholar
39 Sartori, , 327–28.Google Scholar