Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:38:02.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convict Runaways in Maryland, 1745–1775

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Kenneth Morgan
Kenneth Morgan
Affiliation:
Kenneth Morgan is Lecturer in History at West London Institute of Higher Education, Isleworth, Middlesex, TW7 5DU, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That the newspaper press in the eighteenth-century Chesapeake colonies was chock-full of advertisements for runaway convicts is a clear indication of the significance of transportation to America in that period. The existence of convicts in Virginia and Maryland stemmed from the provisions of the Transportation Act passed by the British parliament in 1718. This stated that felons found guilty of non-capital crimes against property could be transported to America for seven years while the smaller number of criminals convicted on capital charges could have their death sentence commuted to banishment for either fourteen years or life. Between 1718 and 1775, when the traffic ended with the approach of war, more than 90 percent of the 50,000 convicts shipped across the Atlantic from the British Isles were sold by contractors to settlers in the Chesapeake, where there was a continuous demand for cheap, white, bonded labour. Though many convicts were people who had resorted to petty, theft in hard times rather than habitual criminals, they were often viewed with jaundiced eyes in the Chesapeake as purveyors of crime, disease and corruption. They also had to endure, along with slaves and indentured servants, the everyday reality of lower-class life in colonial America: the exploitation of unfree labour. It is therefore not surprising that many convicts, like other dependent labourers, tried to free themselves from bondage by escaping from their owners.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , August 1989 , pp. 253 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 These points are analyzed in detail in Morris, Richard B., Government and Labor in Early America (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946), 323–47Google Scholar; Smith, Abbot Emerson, Colonists in Bondage: White Servitude and Convict Labor in America, 1607–1776 (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1947), 110–35Google Scholar; Ekirch, A. Roger, “Bound for America: A Profile of British Convicts Transported to the Colonies, 1718–1775”, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 42 (1985), 184–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morgan, Kenneth, “The Organization of the Convict Trade to Maryland: Stevenson, Randolph & Cheston, 1768–1775,”Google Scholaribid., 201–27; Beattie, J. M., Crime and the Courts in England, 1660–1800 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986), passimGoogle Scholar; Bailyn, Bernard, Voyagers to the West: Emigration from Britain to America on the Eve of the Revolution (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986), 260–64, 292–95Google Scholar

2 See the discussion in Morgan, Kenneth, “English and American Attitudes towards Convict Transportation, 1718–1775,” History, 72 (1987), 416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Representative studies of runaway slaves and indentured servants are Wood, Peter H., Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974), 239–70Google Scholar; Mullin, Gerald W., Flight and Rebellion: Slave Resistance in Eighteenth-Century Virginia (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972), passimGoogle Scholar; Morgan, Philip D., “Colonial South Carolina Runaways: Their Significance for Slave Culture,” Slavery and Abolition, 6 (1985), 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wood, Betty, Slavery in Colonial Georgia, 1730–1775 (Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, 1984), 169–87Google Scholar; Kay, Marvin L. Michael and Gary, Lorin Lee, “Slave Runaways in Colonial North Carolina, 1748–1775,” North Carolina Historical Review, 63 (1986), 1–39Google Scholar; Salinger, Sharon V., “To Serve Well and Faithfully”: Labor and Indentured Servants in Pennsylvania, 1682–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 103–09Google Scholar. Convict runaways in Virginia are discussed in Schmidt, Frederick H., “British Convict Servant Labor in Colonial Virginia” (College of William and Mary Ph.D. dissertation, 1976), ch. vii. AGoogle Scholar. Ekirch, Roger, Bound for America: The Transportation of British Convicts to the Colonies, 1718–1775 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar is a recent study of transportation which also examines runaway felons, although its emphases and interpretations differ somewhat from mine. For example, Ekirch argues that it was relatively easy for runaway convicts to escape permanently, while I argue the opposite. Ekirch also thinks that differences in the regional background of convicts led to divisions amongst transported felons, and that convicts were sometimes racially prejudiced towards slaves, but I cannot see any evidence which supports these notions. For a critique of Ekirch's, book see my review article “Convict Transportation to Colonial America,” Reviews in American History, 17 (1989), 29–34.Google Scholar

4 Calculated from figures given for the importation to Maryland of German and Irish passengers, indentured and convict servants, and Negro slaves in Morris, , Government and Labor in Early America, 315n–316n.Google Scholar

5 Extant issues of the Maryland Gazette (1745–1775)Google Scholar and the Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser (20 08 1773–31 12 1775)Google Scholar were consulted; duplicate advertisements for felons were ignored; and notices for convict runaways from Virginia were also disregarded. My research was partly made possible by the loan of microfilm copies of the Maryland Gazette from the State Historical Society of Wisconsin.

6 Ekirch, , “Bound for America,” 194.Google Scholar

7 Brown, William, Maryland Gazette (hereafter Md. Gaz.), 10 03 1757Google Scholar; John Holliday, ibid., 2 Nov. 1775.

8 Cf. Galenson, David, White Servitude in Colonial America: An Economic Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 45–47, 61, 75–78.Google Scholar

9 The table is confined to men because only one of the thirty female convict runaways is listed as having an occupation. Also excluded are forty-four male convicts whose skills are recorded in ambiguous phrases such as “pretends to be,” “says he understands” and “profess themselves.”

10 Cf. Morgan, , “The Organization of the Convict Trade to Maryland,” 220–23.Google Scholar

11 Bailyn, , Voyagers to the West, 260, 264, 324–25.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., 245–54; Robbins, Michael W., “The Principio Company: Ironmaldng in Colonial Maryland, 1720–1781,” (George Washington University Ph.D. dissertation, 1972), 299–308Google Scholar. A good map of ironworks in Maryland c. 1760–1775 is included in Cappon, Lester J. et al. (eds.), Atlas of Early American History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976), 29.Google Scholar

13 Calculated from runaway advertisements in Md. Gaz. (1745–1775)Google Scholar and the Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser (20 08 1773–31 12 1775).Google Scholar

14 Cf. Bailyn, , Voyagers to the West, 248–49.Google Scholar

15 Lowndes, Christopher, Md. Gaz., 12. 09 1750.Google Scholar

16 William Young, ibid., 23 Oct. 1766.

17 Samuel Middleton, ibid., 22 Nov. 1749; Hugh Thomas, ibid., 18 Apr. 1750; Hugh Jones, ibid., 16 Apr. 1752; John Mayne, ibid., 16 Sept. 1756; Nicholas Britton, ibid., 5 July 1770.

18 Stephen Onion, ibid., 31 Mar. 1747; Lawrence Washington, ibid., 31 Aug. 1748; Christopher Lowndes, ibid., 12 Sept. 1750; Brian Philpot, Jr. and Thomas Wood, ibid., 4 June 1752; John Metcalfe, ibid., 26 Apr. 1753; James Perry and John Bond, ibid., 31 Oct. 1754; James Wood, ibid., 18 Oct. 1764; Richard Croxall, ibid., 2 May 1765; Mordecai Hammond, ibid., 3 Oct. 1765; Vernon Hebb, ibid., 5 June 1766; Walter Beall, ibid., 1 Jan. 1767; Nathan Farrow, ibid., 1 Oct. 1767; David Gorsuch, ibid., 31 Oct. 1771; Nicholson, Benjamin, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 28 08 1773.Google Scholar

19 Eddis, William, Letters from America, ed. Land, Aubrey C. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969), 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Chamier, Daniel, Md. Gaz., 4 07 1761.Google Scholar

21 Benjamin Tasker & Co., ibid., 27 May 1746.

22 Paul Rankin, ibid., 27 Apr. 1758.

23 John Tree and Otho Othoson, ibid., 5 Apr. 1753.

24 John Thompson, Jr., ibid., 10 May 1764.

25 John Coppage, ibid., 29 Mar. 1764.

26 Thomas King et al., ibid., 7 Oct. 1747; William Byns, ibid., 15 June 1748; Charles Carroll, ibid., 26 June 1751; John Sims, ibid., 30 July 1752; John Welsh, ibid., 18 Sept. 1755; Christopher Lowndes, ibid., 23 Oct. 1755; Henry Callister, ibid., 27 Nov. 1755; Caleb Dorsey, ibid., 7 Oct. 1756; Alexander Stewart et al., ibid., 15 Feb. 1759; George Plater, ibid., 8 Mar. 1759; Richard MacKubin and Allen Quynn, ibid., 13 Sept. 1759; Enoch Magruder, ibid., 4 Oct. 1764; James Wood, ibid., 18 Oct. 1764; Richard Croxall, ibid., 2 May 1765; Nicholson, Benjamin, Maryland journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 24 08 1774Google Scholar; Abraham Jarrett, ibid., 24 May 1775.

27 E.g. Dorsey, Nicholas, Md. Gaz., 24 06 1746Google Scholar; Thomas King et al., ibid., 7 Oct. 1747; William Byns, ibid., 15 June 1748; Lawrence Washington, ibid., 31 Aug. 1748; John Drummond, ibid., 10 Oct. 1750; Charles Carroll, ibid., 26 June 1751; John Kinsman, ibid., 21 Aug. 1754; William Hamersley, ibid., 11 Sept. 1755; James Plant, ibid.,; Jan. 1758; Alexander Stewart et al., ibid., 15 Feb. 1759; Richard Croxall, ibid., 9 Oct. 1760; John Ireland, ibid., 18 June 1761; George Haile senior, ibid., 29 Sept. 1763; William Gartrell, ibid., 10 May 1764; Walter Wyle, ibid., 2 Oct. 1766; Nathan Farrow, ibid.,1 Oct. 1767; Thomas Elliott, ibid., 26 Nov. 1772; Perman, Thomas, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 24 08 1774.Google Scholar

28 E.g. Benjamin Tasker & Co., Md. Gaz., 27 05 1746Google Scholar; William Dawes, ibid., 19 Aug. 1746; Orlando Griffith, ibid., 5 July 1749; Joshua Dorsey, ibid., 19 Sept. 1750; Brian Philpot Jr. and Thomas Ward, ibid., 4 June 1752; Patrick Creagh, ibid., 11 Apr. 1754; Thomas Barnes et al., ibid., 4 Mar. 1756; Jacob Giles, ibid., 15 Sept. 1757; Robert Johnston, ibid., 5 Oct. 1758; Charles Carroll et al., ibid., 29 Nov. 1759; Stewart & Lux, ibid., 11 Aug. 1763; Aquila Brown, ibid., 12 Apr. 1764; Henry Gassaway, ibid., 4 June 1767; Richard Weedon, ibid., 13 July 1769; Abraham Ayres, ibid., 23 Aug. 1770; Anne Middleton, ibid., 28 Mar. 1771.

29 Alexander Stewart et al., ibid., 15 Feb. 1759; Charles Carroll et al., ibid., 29 Nov. 1759; Stewart & Lux, ibid., 11 Aug. 1763.

30 Benjamin Ryan, ibid., 15 July 1746; Lawrence Washington, ibid., 31 Aug. 1748; Christopher Lowndes, ibid., 12 Sept. 1750; Richard Lee, ibid., 16 Oct. 1751; John Jordan et al., ibid., 29 Jan. 1756; William Brown, ibid., 23 June 1768.

31 Thomas King, ibid., 24 Aug. 1748; Patrick Creagh, ibid., 16 July 1752; Benedict Calvert, ibid., 19 July 1753; Patrick Creagh and Gamaliel Butler, ibid., 15 Jan. 1756; Peter Maxwell, ibid., 18 Aug. 1757; Richard MacCubbin and Allen Quynn, ibid., 13 Sept. 1759; William Isgrig and John Jones, ibid., 29 Mar. 1764; Enoch Magruder, ibid., 18 Oct. 1764; Charles Ridgely senior, ibid., 25 Sept. 1766; Thomas Chisholm, ibid., 24 Aug. 1769; John Hesselins, ibid., 2 Nov. 1769; Peter Hunter, ibid., 26 July 1770.

32 Alexander Stewart et al., ibid., 15 Feb. 1759.

33 Robert Morris, ibid., 6 Sept. 1745.

34 Richard Croxall, ibid., 1 May 1760. Other advertisements which mention that convicts took extra clothes include Benjamin Ryan, ibid., 15 July 1746; Benjamin North and Alexander Stewart, ibid., 22 Mar. 1759; Enoch Magruder, ibid., 18 Oct. 1764; Caleb Dorsey, ibid., 23 May 1765; Thomas Samuel and John Snowden, ibid., 3 Apr. 1766; John McDonall, ibid., 19 Mar. 1767; Caleb Dorsey, ibid., 2 June 1768; John Holliday, ibid., 8 Aug. 1771.

35 John Ashford, ibid., 10 Oct. 1750; on board the snow Falcon, ibid., 28 Aug. 1755; Isaac Harris and Jonathan Pinkney, ibid., 15 Nov. 1764; John McDowell, ibid., 19 Mar. 1767; Thomas Sollers, ibid., 9 June 1768; George Randell, ibid., 21 Dec. 1769; Thomas Smyth, ibid., 30 Sept. 1775.

36 Calculated from runaway advertisements in the Md. Gaz. (1745–1775)Google Scholar and the Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser (20 08 1773–31 12 1775).Google Scholar

37 Duvall, Charles, Md. Gaz., 16 04 1772.Google Scholar

38 Alexander Lawson, ibid., 2 May 1754.

39 Rediker, Marcus, “‘Good Hands, Stout Heart, and Fast Feet’: The History and Culture of Working People in Early America,” Labour/Le Travailleur, 10 (1982), passim.Google Scholar Further elaboration of this theme can be found in Rediker, , Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Merchant Seamen, Pirates, and the Anglo-American Maritime World, 1700–1790 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

40 E.g. Lowndes, Christopher, Md. Gaz., 14 09 1748 and 12 09 1750Google Scholar; Joshua Dorsey, ibid., 19 Sept. 1750; John Tillotson, ibid., 19 June 1751; Hugh Jones, ibid., 16 Apr. 1752; John Williams, ibid., 23 Nov. 1752; Patrick Creagh, ibid., 18 Sept. 1755; John Goody, ibid., 5 Oct. 1758; Joseph Jacobs, ibid., 7 Aug. 1766; William Duvall, ibid., 10 Nov. 1768; James Campbell, ibid., 7 Sept. 1769; Benjamin Dorsey, ibid., 16 Aug. 1770.

41 Thomas James, ibid., 6 June 1765.

42 E.g. Cornelius Howard, ibid., 20 Mar. 1751; Daniel Wells, ibid., 28 May 1752; John Welsh, ibid., 18 Sept. 1755; Paul Rankin, ibid., 27 Apr. 1758; Joshua Cockey, ibid., 21 May 1761; William Hall, ibid., 1 July 1762; Joseph Watkins, ibid., 30 Sept. 1762; Charles Ridgely senior, ibid., 25 Sept. 1766; Thomas Talbot, ibid., 28 July 1768; Richard Croxall, ibid., 4 Aug. 1768; George Randell, ibid., 21 Dec. 1769; Nicholas Britton, ibid., 5 July 1770 John Hood and Mordecai Selby, ibid., 30 Mar. 1775; Nicholson, Benjamin, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 18–25 09 1773.Google Scholar

43 Lowndes, Christopher, Md. Gaz., 14 09 1748Google Scholar; Thomas Talbot, ibid., 28 July 1768.

44 Morgan, , “The Organization of the Convict Trade to Maryland,” 213–15Google Scholar; Howard, John, The State of the Prisons in England and Wales…, 2nd edn. (London, 1780), passim.Google Scholar

45 E.g. Morris, Robert, Md. Gaz., 6 09 1745Google Scholar; John Ridgely, ibid., 29 June 1748; Henry Ridgely senior and junior, ibid., 20 Sept. 1749; Robert Couden, ibid., 13 Feb. 1751; Thomas Snowden, ibid., 28 Aug. 1751; William Brown, ibid., 4 Nov. 1756; Daniel Pocock, ibid., 21 Apr. 1757; John Fendall, ibid., 27 July 1758; John Kent, ibid., 16 Aug. 1759; Walter Dulany and John Campbell, ibid., 28 Feb. 1760; Edward Osmond, ibid., 16 Apr. 1761; Daniel McPherson, ibid., 2 Sept. 1762; Caroline Orrick, ibid., 20 Oct. 1763; James Franklin, ibid., 24 May 1764; William Jones, ibid., 26 July 1770; William Allen, ibid., 3 Dec. 1772; Johnson, James, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 24 08 1774.Google Scholar

46 Rodgett, Barton, Md. Gaz., 4 03 1746Google Scholar; William Hamersley, ibid., 11 Sept. 1755. Most advertisements for runaway convicts in the Maryland press contain details on distinguishing physical features of felons.

47 E.g. Dorsey, Nicholas, Md. Gaz., 24 06 1746Google Scholar; Stephen Onion, ibid., 31 Mar. 1747; William Byns, ibid., 15 June 1748; William Chapman, ibid., 27 Sept. 1749; Charles Motherby, ibid., 15 Aug. 1750; Charles Carroll, ibid., 26 June 1751; John Metcalfe, ibid., 21 Sept. 1752; Benedict Calvert, ibid., 19 July 1753; Thomas Chittam, ibid., 27 June 1754; Thomas Davies, ibid., 24 July 1755; Thomas Harvey, ibid., 24 June 1756; Peter Maxwell, ibid., 18 Aug. 1757; John Legg junior, ibid., 9 Mar. 1758; James Miles, ibid., 1 May 1760; Edward Osmond, ibid., 16 Apr. 1761; Nathan Lane, ibid., 3 Feb. 1763; John Walker, ibid., 5 July 1764; Edward Osmond, ibid., 18 Apr. 1765; Isaac Short, ibid., 22 Sept. 1774.

48 Hugh Thomas, ibid., 18 Apr. 1750.

49 James Braddock, ibid., 1 Dec. 1774.

50 E.g. Robert Morris, ibid., 6 Sept. 1745; Thomas Hammond, ibid., 18 Sept. 1755; Henry Callister, ibid., 27 Nov. 1755; John Clarkson, ibid., 9 Aug. 1759; John Hamill, ibid., 11 Sept. 1760; Daniel Wolstenholme, ibid., 25 Sept. 1760; Basil Waring and John Waring, ibid., 4 Sept. 1766; Thomas Chisholm, ibid., 24 Aug. 1769.

51 Lawrence Washington, ibid., 31 Aug. 1748; Francis King and Henry Hardey, ibid., 19 Sept. 1765; Samuel Howard, ibid., 30 July 1772.

52 Robert Morris, ibid., 6 Sept. 1745; Daniel Dulany, ibid., 16 Sept. 1746; Charles Carroll, ibid., 19 Apr. 1749; John Goody, ibid., 5 Oct. 1758; Richard Gresham, ibid., 31 July 1766.

53 For portraits of runaway convicts and indentured servants for 1774–1775, drawn by a modern graphic artist, see Bailyn, , Voyagers to the West, 352 ff.Google Scholar

54 McCormac, Eugene Irving, White Servitude in Maryland, 1634–1820, Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, 22 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1904), 51–55.Google Scholar

55 E.g. Dorsey, Nicholas, Md. Gaz., 24 06 1746Google Scholar; John Baylis, ibid., 15 June 1748; Patrick Creagh, ibid., 7 Nov. 1750; Gamaliel Butler and Patrick Doran, ibid., 10 Apr. 1751; Thomas Nickolls junior, ibid., 29 Aug. 1754; James Miles, ibid., 1 May 1760; Alexander Stenhouse, ibid., 23 Apr. 1761; Nathaniel Pope, ibid., 27 Dec. 1764; James Smith, ibid., 31 Oct. 1765; John Adamson, ibid., 12 June 1766; William How, ibid., 15 June 1769; Thomas Chisholm, ibid., 24 Aug. 1769; Thomas Sappington, ibid., 19 Aug. 1773.

56 Thomas Towson and Thomas Stevens, ibid., 30 Aug. 1753; John Kinsman, ibid., 21 Aug. 1754; John Goody, ibid., 5 Oct. 1758; Daniel McPherson, ibid., 2 Sept. 1762.

57 Richard MacCubbin and Allen Quynn, ibid., 13 Sept. 1759.

58 Penn, Rezin, Maryland journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 11 10 1775.Google Scholar

59 Carter, Jacob, Md. Gaz., 9 06 1756Google Scholar; John Legg junior, ibid., 9 Mar. 1758; Richard Croxall, ibid., 11 May 1758; George Plater, ibid., 8 Mar. 1759; Thomas Samuel and John Snowden, ibid., 3 Apr. 1766; Henry Griffith junior, ibid., 11 June 1772; Thomas Hammond, ibid., 7 Jan. 1773; Cromwell, William and Ebert, John, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 18 06–2 07 1774.Google Scholar

60 Plater, George, Md. Gaz., 8 03 1759Google Scholar; Henry Griffith junior, ibid., 11 June 1772.

61 Eddis, , Letters from America, ed. Land, 38.Google Scholar

62 Davies, Thomas, Md. Gaz., 24 07 1755Google Scholar. A pistole or doblon was a Spanish gold coin worth approximately £0.83p. in 1766. John Mair in 1768 stated that the double doblon (or four-pistole piece) was among the common coins circulating in North America. McCusker, John J., Money and Exchange in Europe and America, 1600–1775: A Handbook (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1978), 5, 6n, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Other advertisements noting rewards for convict runaways include Mullinux, Jonathan, Md. Gaz., 14 08 1755Google Scholar; John Brown, ibid., 14 Aug. 1755; Richard Croxall, ibid., 21 Aug. 1755; Walter Dulany, ibid., 9 June 1756.

63 Green, William, The Sufferings of William Green (London, 1774), 7.Google Scholar

64 Dorsey, Caleb, Md. Gaz., 5 09 1771.Google Scholar

65 Seborn Tucker, ibid., 23 June 1774.

66 Many convicts returned to Britain before the end of their sentence (Beattie, , Crime and the Courts in England, 540–41Google Scholar). For examples of felons who were retried, sentenced to death and executed after returning home before their terms expired, see Knapp, Andrew and Baldwin, William (eds.), The Newgate Calendar… (London, 1824–1825), vol. 1, 133–34: vol. 2, 97–107.Google Scholar

67 This section is entirely based on An Apology for the Life of Bampfylde-Moore Carew… (London, n.d.)Google Scholar. This has been convincingly dated to 1749 by Wilkinson, C. H. (ed.), The King of the Beggars: Bampfylde-Moore Carew (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1931), vii.Google Scholar

68 Devon Record Office, Exeter Quarter Sessions, Easter 1739, QS 1/18, p. 105.

69 An Apology for the Life of Bampfylde-Moore Carew, 119.Google Scholar

70 Ibid., 133–34.

71 Wilkinson, (ed.), The King of the Beggars, vii.Google Scholar

72 E.g. Ross, David, Md. Gaz., 12 08 1746Google Scholar; Thomas Rutherford, ibid., 15 Sept. 1747; Nathaniel Folsom, ibid., 9 Nov. 1748; John Welsh, ibid., 18 Sept. 1755; Thomas John Hammond, ibid., 9 June 1756; Benjamin North and Alexander Stewart, ibid., 22 Mar. 1759; Michael Earle and Henry Pearce, ibid., 17 April 1766; Alexander Wells, ibid., 10 Mar. 1768; Caleb Dorsey, ibid., 12 Jan. 1769; Thomas Rutland, ibid., 12 July 1770; John Hood, ibid., 21 Sept. 1775; Owings, Thomas, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, 24 02–3 03 1774Google Scholar; John Wells, ibid., 11–18 June 1774; Abraham Jarrett, ibid., 24 May 1775.

73 An Apology for the Life of Bampfylde-Moore Carew, 24–25, 123.Google Scholar