Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T15:48:33.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield estimation of tropical and temperate pasture species using an electronic capacitance meter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Jones  and
K. P. Haydock
R. J. Jones
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Tropical Pastures, Cunningham Laboratory, Mill Road, St Lucia, Queensland 4067
K. P. Haydock
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Mathematical Statistics, Cunningham Laboratory, Mill Road, St Lucia, Queensland 4067
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Modifications to the New Zealand meter (Campbell, Phillips & O'Reilly, 1962) are briefly described and the results obtained with the modified meters presented.

Water was shown to have the dominant influence on meter reading—dessication of the plant material reduced readings, application of water increased readings.

The relation between yield of water (W) and meter reading (MR) depended on the circuitry of the meter used and was similar to that between capacitance change induced by a variable capacitor and meter reading. With the new meters this relation was strongly linear. For individual species the simple correlation of W on MR was generally superior to that for weight of dry matter. Regression coefficients for weight of water on meter reading differed between species and/or days but were correlated with the relative water content of the species (RW). Inclusion of RW in addition to that of W increased the variation accounted for (V%) when all species were included from 76·0 to 86·9%. However, the multiple regression did not eliminate bias. For individual species, there was no benefit in including the RW term.

The inclusion of height of herbage (H) in a multiple regression equation with weight of water greatly improved the V% when compared with the regression of meter reading on weight of water alone for oats dressed with three levels of nitrogen. The V% increased from 71·3% for W alone to 90·0% when W, H and H2 were included in the regression. Further testing using height of herbage over a wide range of species will be required to confirm this improvement for use in an overall regression.

Emphasis is placed on the very strong linear relation between yield (of water or dry matter) and meter reading within any one pasture at any one time. Use is made of this relation in the presentation of a new method, which overcomes the bias associated with prediction equations, for estimating pasture yields. This entails establishing the mean reading for any pasture and cutting for yield estimation three samples having such a mean. The limitations of the method for use with mixtures is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , August 1970 , pp. 27 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcock, M. B. (1964). An improved electronic instrument for estimation of pasture yield. Nature, Lond. 203, 1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, M. B. & Lovett, J. V. (1967). The electronic measurement of the yield of growing pasture. 1. A statistical assessment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algie, J. E. (1964). The measurement of regain of wool by electrical capacity-type moisture meters. Effect of temperature on the dielectric constant of wool. Text. Res. J. 34, 1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algie, J. E. (1966). The measurement of regain of wool by electrical capacity-type moisture meters. II. The dielectric properties of wool top and the effect of impurities. Text. Res. J. 36, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algie, J. E. (1967). The measurement of regain of wool by electrical capacity-type moisture meters. III. The dielectric properties of scoured wool. Text. Res. J. 37, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algie, J. E. (1968). Some dielectric properties of dry keratin. Kolloid-Z. Z. Polymere. 223, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, H. L. (1968). An evaluation of an electronic instrument for pasture yield estimation. 1. General relationships. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 23, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. G., Phillips, D. S. M. & O'reilly, E. D. (1962). An electronic instrument for pasture yield estimation. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 17, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1924). The influence of rainfall on the yield of wheat at Rothamsted. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 213, 89.Google Scholar
Hearle, J. W. S. (1954). Capacity, dielectric constant, and power factor of fiber assemblies. Text. Res. J. 24, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, F. J. & Lawrence, J. T. (1964). Electronic assessment of pasture growth. Electron. Engng 36, 666–70.Google Scholar
Johns, G. G. & Watkin, B. R. (1965). A modified capacitance probe technique for estimating pasture yield. 2. The effect of different pastures, soil types, and dew on calibration. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 20, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, D. L. & Neal, L. R. (1966). A new electronic meter for measuring herbage yield. U.S. Forest Service Research Note. P.S.W. 56, 4.Google Scholar
Sillars, B. A. (1937). The properties of a dielectric containing semiconducting particles of various shapes. J. Instn. elect. Engrs 80, 378.Google Scholar