Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:32:40.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Woburn irrigation, 1960–8:IV. Design and interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. L. Penman
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.

Summary

Results are given for a second period of 9 years, 6 on the pattern of 1951–9, with the last 3 years used for ad hoc management experiments. The meteorological specification of a year of ‘irrigation need’ was satisfied in 4 years: there were good responses in 5 years. During the first 6 years, out of twenty-four sets of crop yields (from eight different crops), very good responses were obtained on nine, good responses on eight, and zero or very slightly negative responses on the other seven.

A general theory of the inter-relationships of growth and water, and of growth and radiation, leads to an expression

k = 39ε t ha−1 cm−1,

as the maximum possible response to irrigation in terms of total dry matter produced, where ɛ is the fraction of solar radiation fixed by the crop (ɛ has a range 50–100 × 10−4 for good to very good farming) when irrigation is needed. The ‘need’ is defined through

Y = k(ET + DeDm),

where Y is the yield, ET is the total potential evaporation, De is a limiting deficit up to which there is no check to growth, and beyond there is no growth, and Dm is the maximum deficit experienced by the crop at the time of measuring Y. The agronomic object of the experiments is to determine De, i.e. what reserve of soil water can be used by the crop before irrigation is necessary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Monteith, J. L. (1966). Local differences in the attenuation of radiation over Britain. Q. Jl R. met. Soc. 92, 254–62,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1962). Woburn irrigation, 1951–59. I. Purpose, design and weather; II. Results for grass; III. Results for rotation crops. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 343–8; 349–64; 365–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1963). Weather and water in the growth of potatoes. In The Growth of the potato, pp. 191–8. Proc. Easter Sch. Agric. Sci. Univ. Nott. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (19671968). Climate and crops. Mem. Proc. Manch. lit. phil. Soc. 110, 113.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. (1967). Potencial transpiration. Tech. Bull. M.A.F.F. 16. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Stiles, W. & Williams, T. E. (1965). The responses of a ryegrass/white clover sward to various irrigation regimes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar