Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:34:50.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Visual estimation of plant water status in cereals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. G. Jones
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trwmpington, Cambridge

Summary

The potential offered for plant breeding programmes by visual scoring techniques for plant water status was investigated in rice and spring wheat. It was found that differing plant morphology could seriously bias visual estimates of leaf water potential, particularly in spring wheat. In spite of this problem, it was found that at least for rice, this type of approach may have potential in future breeding programmes where an estimate of leaf water status is required, such as those for drought tolerance, so long as a high intensity of selection is not necessary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. B. & Jones, H. G. (1975). The physiology of wheat. Plant Breeding Institute Annual Report for 1974, pp. 2073.Google Scholar
Barrs, H. D. (1968). Determination of water deficits in plant tissues. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth I (ed. Kozlowski, T. T.), pp. 235368. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blum, A. (1974). Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress. I. Response to soil moisture stress. Crop Science 14, 361364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. (1978). The genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants: A ease for sorghum. In Stress Physiology of Crop Plants (ed. Mussell, H. and Staples, R. C.) (in the Press). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Chang, T. T., Loresto, G. C. & Tagumpay, O. (1974). Screening rice germplasm for drought resistance. Sabrao Journal 6, 916.Google Scholar
Chang, T. T., Loresto, G. C, Tagumpay, O., Manimtim, B. & Marciano, A. (1975). Field evaluation and breeding for drought resistance. International Rice Research Institute Saturday Seminar Paper.Google Scholar
Derera, N. F., Marshall, D. R. & Balaam, L. N. (1969). Genetic variability in root development in relation to drought tolerance in spring wheats. Experimental Agriculture 5, 327337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, L. A. & Miller, J. W. (1971). Rapid measurements of relative turgidity in maize (Zea mays L.). New Phytologist 70, 555560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, E. A. (1971). Can we breed for drought resistance? In Drought Injury and Resistance in Crops (ed. Larson, K. L. and Eastin, J. D.). Madison: Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Hurd, E. A. (1974). Phenotype and drought tolerance in wheat. Agricultural Meteorology 14, 3955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iljin, W. S. (1957). Drought resistance in plants and physiological processes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 8, 257274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1972). Effects of water stress on photosynthesis. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1973). Estimation of plant water status with the beta-gauge. Agricultural Meteorology 11, 345355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1974). Assessment of stomatal control of plant water status. New Phytologist 73, 851859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1977). Aspects of the water relations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to induced drought. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 267282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1978). Stomatal behaviour and breeding for drought resistance. In Stress Physiology of Crop Plants (ed. Mussell, H. and Staples, R. C.) (in the Press). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Knipling, E. B. (1970). Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 1, 155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, J. (1972). Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maximov, N. A. (1929). The Plant in Relation to Water. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mussell, H. & Staples, R. C. (1978). Stress Physiology of Crop Plants (in the Press). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
O'Toole, J. C. & Chang, T. T. (1978). Drought resistance in cereals: rice a case study. In Stress Physiology of Crop Plants (ed. Mussell, H. and Staples, R. C.) (in the Press). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (1972). The effect of root geometry on yield of wheat growing on stored water. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 745752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Hemmingsen, E. A. & Bradstreet, E. D. (1964). Hydrostatio pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States 52, 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimshi, D. & Ephrat, J. (1975). Stomatal behaviour of wheat cultivars in relation to their transpiration, photosynthesis and yield. Agronomy Journal 67, 326331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, N. C., Deroo, H. & Wright, W. H. (1971). A pressure chamber for the measurement of plant water potential. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station. Special Soils Bulletin XXXIII.Google Scholar