Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T16:36:33.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vegetative growth of winter barley in relation to environmental conditions and grain yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Ramos ,
L. F. Garcia del Moral  and
L. Recalde
J. M. Ramos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Oranada, Spain
L. F. Garcia del Moral
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Oranada, Spain
L. Recalde
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Oranada, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The object of this study was to investigate the vegetative growth in six barley varieties grown in southern Spain (Granada) during 1979, 1980 and 1981. The results showed that crop dry weight (CDW) was dependent on environmental factors (mean temperature, rain, and radiation) which were the determinants of the two CDW components, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area ratio (LAR). However, the effects of these climatic factors on crop growth rate (CGR) and on its components, mean leaf area index () and net assimilation rate (NAR), were partially obscured by ontogenetic drift. In addition, a highly significant relationship was demonstrated between CDW (when the LAI reaches its maximum value) and grain yield. This suggests that the pre-anthesis period has a great influence in the determination of grain yield variation in hot, dry areas, where photosynthesis is very limited after ear emergence.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 413 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. B., Morgan, C. L., Ford, M. A. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Contributions to grain yield from pre-anthesis assimilation in tall and dwarf barley phenotypes in two contrasting seasons. Annals of Botany (New Series) 45, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, G. E. (1968). The application of the concepts of growth analysis to the assessment of productivity. In Functioning of Terrestrial Ecosystems at the Primary Production Level (ed. Eckardt, F. F.), pp. 243–259. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. (1978). Barley. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. C. (1972). The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garcia del Moral, L. F., Ramos, J. M. & Recalde, L. (1984). Tillering dynamics of winter barley as influenced by cultivar and nitrogen fertilizer: a field study. Crop Science 24, 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1954). Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes scale. Plant Pathology 3, 128–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, D. W., Day, W., Johnston, A. E., Legg, B. J. & Parkinson, K. J. (1981). Growth of spring barley under drought: crop development, photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and nutrient content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, J. M., Garcia del Moral, L. F. & Recalde, L. (1982). The influence of pre- and post-anthesis periods on yields of winter barley varieties in southern Spain. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 521–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoy, V. (1963). The translocation of 14C-labelled photosynthetic products from the leaf to the ear in wheat. Physiologia Plantarum 16, 851–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1960). Variations with age in net assimilation rate and other growth attributes of sugar-beot, potato, and barley in a controlled environment. Annals of Botany (New Series)s 24, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1961). Effects of age and environment on net assimilation rate of barley. Annals of Botany (New Series) 25, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren Wilson, J. (1981). Analysis of growth, photosynthesis and light interception for single plants and stands. Annals of Botany (New Series) 48, 507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1952). The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4, 101–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1956). Leaf growth in relation to yield. In The Growth of Leaves (ed. Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 178–191. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1958). The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf-area index. Annals of Botany (New Series) 22, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1963). Analysis of growth and yield of winter and spring wheats. Annals of Botany (New Series) 27, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. F. (1946). The physiology of plant growth with special reference to the concept of net assimilation rate. Annals of Botany (New Series) 10, 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar