Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:23:33.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in the onset of the breeding year in the goat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. A. Asdell
Affiliation:
(Animal Nutrition Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)

Extract

A series of upwards of 6000 matings of goats has been arranged according t o the month of service and correlated with temperature and rainfall.

The maximum of reproduction is found to be in October, and the minimum in May.

A cool summer produces early oestrus while a hot one has the opposite effect. The August temperature is of paramount importance in this respect.

Rainfall had no effect, on the onset of oestrus in the series examined.

The hypothesis is advanced that most mammals breed only in the spring and autumn because their body temperature may be too high in summer for follicular development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Marshall, (1922). The Physiology of Reproduction. London.Google Scholar
(2)Hammond, and Sanders, (1923). Journ. Agric. Sci. 13, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Cole, and Rodolfo, (1924). Proc. Amer. Soc. Animal Production, p. 116.Google Scholar
(4)Drummond-Robinson, and Asdell, (1926). Journ. Physiol. 61, 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Marshall, (1908). Trans. Highland and Agric. Soc. 20, 131.Google Scholar
(6)Crew, (1922). Journ. Anat. 56, 89.Google Scholar
(7)Moore, and Oslund, (1924). Amer. Journ. Physiol. 67, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Davy, (1839). Researches. London, 1, 208.Google Scholar
(9)Davy, (1845). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. p. 319; and 1850, p. 437.Google Scholar
(10)Jousset, (1883). Arch, de Med. Nav. 40, 124.Google Scholar
(11)Bosanquet, (1895). Lancet, p. 672.Google Scholar
(12)Edwards, . In Todd's Cyclopoedia of Anal, and Physiol. 2, 652.Google Scholar
(13)Simpson, (1912). Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 32, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar