Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:17:33.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation between and within birds in the estimation of the metabolizable energy content of diets for laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. H. Foster
W. H. Foster
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three experiments were performed in which variation in metabolizable energy (M.E.) determinations was studied using a total of 137 laying hens. Consistent breed differences in classical M.E. estimates were found, and there were statistically significant differences between pullets within strains. Estimates were obtained of the within-bird variation in classical M.E. determinations and, from the estimated variance components, standard errors of the mean classical M.E. value were predicted for determinations using various numbers of pullets of one breed and various numbers of measurements per pullet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 1968 , pp. 153 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. L. & Bancroft, T. A. (1952). Statistical Theory in Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Begin, J. J. (1967). The relation of breed and sex of chickens to the utilization of energy. Poult. Sci. 46, 379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. O., Waring, J. J. & Addison, K. F. (1967). The utilization of energy by the laying hen. In Progress in Livestock Nutrition, pp. 77–95. U.S. Feed Grains Council. London: Graham Cherry.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. (1959). Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics. In Techniques and Procedures in Animal Production Research, p. 74. American Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, p. 143. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Foster, W. H. (1967). Genetic aspects of the efficiency of energy and calcium utilization by the laying hen. Ph.D. Thesis. Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. (1953). Estimation of variance and convariance components. Biometrics 9, 226–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W. (1965). Utilization of energy for growth by chicks. In Energy Metabolism (Blaxter, K. L., ed.), pp. 327–32. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1966). Aspects of poultry nutrition. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (Abrams, J. T., ed.), p. 119–42. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. & Slinger, S. J. (1963). The effects of breed, sex, an arsenical and nutrient density of the utilization of dietary energy. Poult. Sci. 42, 1325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slinger, S. J., Sibbald, I. R. & Pepper, W. F. (1964). The relative abilities of two breeds of chickens and two varieties of turkeys to metabolise dietary energy and dietary nitrogen. Poult. Sci. 43, 329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vohra, P. (1966). Energy concepts for poultry nutrition. Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 22, 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar