Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:02:04.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The utilization of wet feed by bacon pigs with special reference to pipe-line feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. J. Forbes
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and Queen's University, Belfast
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and Queen's University, Belfast

Summary

Experiments wore carried out to compare wet and dry feeding for bacon pigs and to study the effect of temperature of feed on the utilization of wet feed. There was no significant difference in growth rate between wet and dry feeding; food conversion ratios tended to be lower on wet feeding and were significantly lower in one experiment. There were no significant differences in growth rate or food conversion between wet feed given at 5 °C, 13 °C or 35 °C. None of the treatments had any significant effect on carcass characteristics. Nitrogen balance and digestibility studies confirmed the results of the production trials. There were no significant differences in the digestibility of dry matter or nitrogen between wet and dry feeding or between extreme temperatures of the feed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1963). Further studies on the water requirements of the growing pig. Anim. Prod. 5, 277–82.Google Scholar
Berek, G. (1963). Comparison of the effect of cold and warm water in the fattening of pigs in winter. Nut. Abs. Rev. 36, 1, Abstr. 1627.Google Scholar
Braude, R. & Rowell, J. G. (1967). Comparison of dry and wet feeding of growing pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 325–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, G. S. (1961). A study of the effects of the processing of cereals on their composition and on their nutritive value for pigs and chickens. M.Agr. Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. R. (1949). The Production and Marketing of Pigs, 2nd edn., pp. 165–6. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Holme, D. W. & Robinson, K. L. (1965). A study of water allowances for the bacon pig. Anim. Prod. 7, 377–84.Google Scholar
Holme, D. W. & Coey, W. E. (1967). The effect of environmental temperature and method of feeding on the performance and carcass composition of bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 9, 209–16.Google Scholar
Klay, R. F., Weller, M. & Smith, G. C. (1964). Effects of restricted feed intake on finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 598, Abstr. 30.Google Scholar
Kostic, J. & Zaletel, I. (1963). Effect of different sources of energy in fattening bacon pigs on wet and dry feeds. Veterinaria, Saraj. 12, 5764.Google Scholar
Larsen, L. M. & Oldfield, J. E. (1960). Improvement of barley rations for swine. II. Effects of pelleting and supplementation with barley malt. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 601–6.Google Scholar
Laube, W. & Weissbach, F. (1963). Fattening pigs given diets with different moisture contents and in different amounts. Tierzucht 17, 277–82.Google Scholar
Meade, R. J., Hanke, H. E., Tumbleson, M. E., Wass, D. & Hanson, L. E. (1964). Effects of feed restriction and protein intake on performance of market hogs. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 1201, Abstr. 18.Google Scholar
Moerison, F. B. (1959). Feeds and Feeding, p. 878. Morrison Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Scholz, K. & Sibgl, O. (1958). The use of pumpable feed for fattening pigs compared with dry feeding. Dt. Landwirt. 9, 492–7.Google Scholar
Tardani, A., Lux, B. & Del Monte, R. (1964). Dry feed and slop for fattening pigs. Riv. Zootec. 37, 669–75.Google Scholar