Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:27:15.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Utilization of poor quality roughages: response of sheep fed native hay supplemented with urea by different methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. N. Umunna
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Ahmadu Bello University, P.M.B. 1044, Zaria, Nigeria

Summary

Sheep were used to study the utilization of low quality native hay supplemented with urea by different methods. Urea supplement was fed either once daily or twice daily or the same quantity of urea used to spray the hay before feeding. These treatments were compared with basal and groundnut cake based supplemented controls. An attempt was made to balance both the mineral and energy intakes. The provision of extra nitrogen in the form of either urea or groundnut cake resulted in improved weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion. Feeding of urea-sprayed hay marginally improved live-weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion over the other methods of urea supplementation. Dry-matter digestibility and nitrogen retention were increased and urinary nitrogen excretion reduced by feeding the urea-sprayed hay.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1962). Factors influencing the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. British Journal of Nutrition 16, 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishwick, G., Parkins, J. J., Hemingway, R. G. & Ritchie, N. S. (1978). A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestibility by beef cows of diets based on oat straw and supplemented with different forms of non-protein nitrogen. Animal Production 26, 135141.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M., Louca, A. & Lawlor, M. J. (1975). A note on the straw intake of sheep given supplements of urea-molasses, soya bean, barley-urea or barley. Animal Production 20, 426432.Google Scholar
Romero, A., Siebert, B. D. & Murray, R. M. (1976). A study of the effect of frequency of urea ingestion on the utilization of low quality roughage by steers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 16, 308314.Google Scholar
Siebert, B. D. & Kennedy, P. M. (1972). The utilization of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus). 1. Factors limiting intake and utilization by cattle and sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, O. C. (1965). Influence of rate of ammonia and energy release on protein synthesis by rumen bacteria. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H. (1972). Urea or biuret supplements to low protein grazing in Africa. World Animal Review 3, 1418.Google Scholar
Umunna, N. N., Chineme, C. N., Saror, D. I., Ahmed, A. & Abed, S. (1981). Response of Yankasa sheep to various lengths of water deprivation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 619622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umunna, N. N. & Dankintafo, A. (1978). Optimum crude protein requirement of growing Zebu and Friesian x Zebu crossbred cattle in Nigeria. Proceedings IVth World Conference on Animal Production, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp. 176182.Google Scholar
Zemmelink, G. (1973). Utilization of poor quality roughages in the Northern Guinea Savannah zone. Animal production in the tropics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Production in the Tropics (ed. Loosli, J. K., Oyenuga, V. A. and Babatunde, G. M.), pp. 167176. Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar