Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:12:58.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of alkali treatment of wheat straw on intake by and growth rate of cattle, with and without a supplement of cotton-seed meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. Sriskandarajah  and
R. C. Kellaway
N. Sriskandarajah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, N.S.W. 2570, Australia
R. C. Kellaway
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, N.S.W. 2570, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Effects of treating wheat straw with caustic soda solution and of providing a cottonseed meal supplement were studied with 40 Friesian heifers (280 kg live weight) in individual pens. Responses were measured in terms of food intake, growth rate and food conversion ratio.

Wheat straw was coarsely-milled and fed ad libitum, untreated (U) or alkali-treated (T); both types of straw were supplemented with urea and minerals. Half the animals on each type of straw were fed 500 g cotton-seed meal (C/day.

Straw intake was higher with T than with U (P < 0·01) and unaffected by the cotton-seed meal supplement, being 4·53, 4·71, 6·58 and 6·56 kg/day on treatments U, UC, T and TC respectively. Alkali treatment and the cotton-seed meal supplement improved live-weight change (P < 0·001), being –6, 189, 334 and 495 g/day respectively. In vivo digestible organic matter in the dry matter, calculated from lignin ratios, was 59, 60, 64 and 64 respectively.

Rumen VFA concentrations were significantly higher, molar proportions of acetic acid lower, propionic and n-butyrie acids higher in animals on T than on U. Plasma urea and rumen ammonia concentrations were lower on treatment T than on U.

It was concluded that wheat straw which is coarsely-milled, NaOH-treated and sprayed with urea and minerals provides sufficient nutrients to allow cattle to grow and that additional gain obtained by feeding cotton-seed meal was predictable in terms of its energy contribution to the diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 241 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, P. R. (1974). Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. XIII. Intake and utilization of wheat straw by sheep and cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Freer, M. (1966). Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 8. Experiments with ground, pelleted roughages. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1962). Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. British Journal of Nutrition 16, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaney, A. L. & Marbach, E. P. (1962). Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, S. W. & Barth, K. M. (1977). Utilisation of supplemental NPN and energy sources by beef steers consuming low-protein hays. Journal of Animal Science 45, 1180–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Dinius, D. A., Goering, H. K. & Oltjen, R. R. (1979). Wheat straw-urea diets for beef steers: alkali treatment and supplementation with protein, monensin and a feed intake supplement. Journal of Animal Science 48, 1223–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Dinius, D. A. & Wheeler, W. E. (1979). Effect of alkali treatment on intake and digestion of barley straw by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 49, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1965 a). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. II. The influence of sustained duodenal infusions of casein or urea upon voluntary intake of low-protein roughages by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1965 b). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. III. The relationship between improvement of nitrogen status and increase in voluntary intake of low-protein roughages by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1970). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VI. Evidence for variation in setting of an intake regulatory mechanism relating to the digesta content of the reticulorumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1977). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VIII. Relationships between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Topps, J. H. (1963). Voluntary intake of low protein diets by sheep. Animal Production 5, 269–276.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Carmona J. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1972). The digestibility and acceptability to sheep of chopped or milled barley straw soaked or sprayed with alkali. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 477–485.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Analysis: Agricultural Handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. W., Williamson, P. J., Lowe, R. F. & Baigent, D. R. (1981). The role of protein supplements in nutrition of young grazing cattle and their subsequent productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. G. (1977). Review article: The alkali treatment of straws. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayasuriya, M. C. N. & Owen, E. (1975). Sodium hydroxide treatment of barley straw; effect of volume and concentration of solution on digestibility and intake by sheep. Animal Production 21, 313–322.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Crofts, F. C., Thiago, L. R. L., Redman, R. G., Leibholz, J. M. L. & Graham, C. A. (1978). A new technique for upgrading the nutritive value of roughages under field conditions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Dunlop, A., Ryan, D., Sriskandarajah, N. & Leibholz, J. (1980). Production and nutritive value of alkali-treated forages. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 257–260.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., & Leibholz, J. (1981). Effects of nitrogen supplements on intake and utilization of low quality forages. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, pp. 66–73 (ed. Farrell, D. J.). Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Kempton, T. J. (1980). The use of nylon bags to characterise the potential degradability of feeds for ruminants. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 28–38 (ed. Farrell, D. J.). Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Kempton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1979). Protein nutrition of growing lambs. 1. Responses in growth and rumen function to supplementation of a low protein-cellulose diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde-treated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempton, T. J., Smith, G. H. & Leng, R. A. (1978). The relationship between growth and glucose availability in sheep and cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 12, 139.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1980). The degradation and utilization of endogenous urea in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibholz, J. & Kellaway, R. C. (1980). The nitrogen requirement of steers fed alkali-treated straw ad libitum. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 481.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z., Neumark, H. & Folman, Y. (1977). Chemical processing of wheat straw and cotton by-products for fattening cattle. 1. Performance of animals receiving the wet material shortly after treatment. Animal Production 25, 27–37.Google Scholar
Lyons, T., Caffrey, P. J. & O'Connell, W. J. (1970). The effect of energy, protein and vitamin supplementation on the performance and voluntary intake of barley straw by cattle. Animal Production 12, 323–334.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Grubb, D. A. (1978). Validation of new systems for protein evaluation in ruminants by testing the effect of urea supplementation on intake and digestibility of straw with or without sodium hydroxide treatment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, E. (1978). Processing of roughages. In Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition, pp. 127–148. (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Pienaar, J. P., Hofmeyr, H. S., Plaut, K. I. & Grattarola, L. (1980). Sodium hydroxide treated wheat straw for sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 10, 209–214.Google Scholar
Pirie, R. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1978). Alkali treatment of straw for ruminants. 1. Utilization of complete diets containing straw by beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, R. G., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1980 a). Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating oaten chaff. British Journal of Nutrition 44, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redman, R. G., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1980 b). Effects of treating oat straw with sodium hydroxide on bacterial protein synthesis and sites of organic matter digestion in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 482.Google Scholar
Saxena, S. K., Otterby, D. E., Donker, J. D. & Good, A. L. (1971). Effects of feeding alkali-treated oat straw supplemented with soyabean meal or nonprotein nitrogen on growth of lambs and on certain blood and rumen liquor parameters. Journal of Animal Science 33, 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, T., Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J. & Siviter, J. W. (1981). The effects of grinding either with or without NaOH treatment, on the utilization of straw by yearling dairy cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriskandarajah, N., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1982). Utilization of low quality roughages; effects of supplements with casein treated or untreated with formaldehyde on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating wheat straw. British Journal of Nutrition (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sriskandarajah, N., Leibholz, J. & Kellaway, R. C. (1980). Digestion kinetics of untreated and alkali-treated oat straw in cattle. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 5, 207.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1979). Kinetics of forage digestion in the rumen. Annales de Recherches Viterinaires 10, 329–331.Google ScholarPubMed
Trenkle, A. H. (1980). Amino acid metabolism and hormonal control during growth. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 505–522 (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P.). Lancaster: MTP Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1964). Symposium on nutrition and forage and pastures: new chemical procedures for evaluating forages. Journal of Animal Science 23, 838–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weichselbaum, T. E. (1946). An accurate and rapid method for the determination of proteins in small amounts of blood serum and plasma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology Technical Supplement 10, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed