Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:49:44.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of the marker 51Cr-EDTA in the ovine caecum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. F. Hecker
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of New England, Armidale, N. S. W. 2351, Australia

Summary

Experiments were done on three sheep fed several diets to determine the usefulness of the marker 51Cr-EDTA in the caecum of the sheep to study changes in weight of digesta and its turnover time. The activity of the marker decreased exponentially with time, indicating that it had mixed with a pool of digesta. Variation in the results was attributed mainly to the slowness of mixing and to the periodic nature of filling with digesta from the ileum.

Most estimates of weight of digesta were compatible with the digesta being contained in the caecum and the proximal colon but in one sheep some estimates obtained by one method of calculation were so large as to be unrealistic. Both the estimated weight and the rate of turnover of digesta varied with the weight of the sheep and the level of food intake.

Type
Short Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruce, J., Goodall, E. D., Kay, R. N. B., Phillipson, A. T. & Vowles, L. E. (1966). The flow of organic and inorganic materials through the alimentary tract of the sheep. Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 4662.Google ScholarPubMed
Biebl, M. (1930). Graphische Darstellung der Darmbewegungen. Klin. Wschr. 9, 1674–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. & Davey, A. W. F. (1970). Voluntary intake, digestion, rate of passage, amount of material in the alimentary tract and behaviour in cows receiving complete diets containing straw and concentrates in different proportions. Brit. J. Nutr. 24, 1013–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, G. D. & Rabinowitz, J. L. (1968). Principles of Radioisotope Methodology. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). Passage of digesta through the intestines of the sheep. Brit. J. Nutr. 19, 325–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. Brit. J. Nutr. 18, 153–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. (1969). Production of volatile fatty acids in the sheep caecum. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 20, 491–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, J. F., Budtz-Olsen, O. E. & Ostwald, M. (1964). The rumen as a water store in sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 15, 961–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, J. F. & Grovum, W. L. (1971). Absorption of water and electrolytes from the large intestine of sheep. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 24 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, J. P. & Phillipson, A. T. (1960). The rate of flow of digesta and their removal along the digestive tract of the sheep. Brit. J. Nutr. 14, 147–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HydÉn, S. (1961). The use of reference substances and the measurement of flow in the alimentary tract. In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, ed. Lewis, D.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. C. (1967). Statistical Methods. Ames: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacy, B. D. (1968). The fate of water in the rumen. 1. A critical appraisal of the use of soluble markers. Br. J. Nutr. 22, 369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, V. J. (1965). Microbial metabolism in the forestomachs and the large intestine of sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 16, 7791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar