Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:32:33.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theory of Wetting, and the Determination of the Wetting Power of Dipping and Spraying Fluids containing a Soap Basis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. F. Cooper  and
W. H. Nuttall
W. F. Cooper
Affiliation:
(From the Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford.)
W. H. Nuttall
Affiliation:
(From the Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The dipping of sheep and cattle, as a means of eradicating ‘scab,’ lice, ticks, etc., and the diseases which it is now known the latter may transmit, has met with such success, that compulsory dipping is now in vogue in most pastoral countries. Where compulsory dipping obtains, there must of necessity be some system of the standardisation of dips. In Queensland and South Africa, the respective Governments issue official formulae from which the stockbreeder can prepare his own dipping fluid. Only such proprietary dips, as are duly recognised by the Government, may be employed. In the United States, the regulations for the sale of proprietary dips are still more stringent. The quantity of active substance, usually sodium arsenite, nicotine or cresylic acid, is defined within very narrow limits. Further, no proprietary dip is now recognised, unless the manufacturer can furnish a ‘Field Tester,’ by means of which the stockbreeder can himself determine, in a simple and fairly trustworthy manner, the percentage of active constituent in his bath.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , September 1915 , pp. 219 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brünnich, J. C. and Smith, F. (1914). Factors influencing Efficacy and Deterioration of Cattle-dipping fluids. Queensland Agricultural Journal (New Series), II. pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
Donnan, F. G. (1899). Über die Natur der Seifenemulsionen. Ztschr. f. Phys. Chem. XXXI. pp. 42–49. 3 Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freundlich, H. (1909). Kapillarchemie. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hillyer, H. W. (1903). On the cleansing power of soap. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. XXV. pp. 511–24. 3 Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefroy, H. M. (1915). Insecticides. The Annals of Applied Biology, I. pp. 280–98. 1 Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Wm. C. (1908). An Experimental Examination of Gibbs' Theory of Surface Concentration, regarded as the basis of Adsorption, with an Application to the Theory of Dyeing. Phil. Mag. (6), XV. pp. 499–526. 4 Tables. 5 Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maranqoni, C. (1871). Über die Ausbreitung der Tropfen einer Flüssigkeit auf der Oberfläche einer anderen. Pogg. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, CXLIII. pp. 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnee, S. R. (1907). On Surface Concentration and the Formation of Liquid Films. Philosophical Magazine, (6), XIII. pp. 96–110. 4 Tables. 2 Figs.Google Scholar
Plateau, (1873). Statique des liquides. II. Paris.Google Scholar
Quincke, G. (1877). Über den Randwinkel und die Ausbreitung von Flüssigkeiten auf festen Körpern. Wied. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, II. pp. 145–94. 10 Tables. 6 Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quincke, G. (1888). Über periodische Ausbreitung an Flüssigkeitoberflāchen und dadurch hervorgerufene Bewegungserscheinungen. Wied. Ann. XXXV. pp. 580–642. 9 Tables. 37 Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, (1890). On the Tension of Recently Formed Liquid Surfaces. Proc. Roy. Soc. XLVII. pp. 281–87. 2 Figs.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, (1890 a). Oh Foam. Proc. Royal Institution, XIII. pp. 85–97. 6 Figs.Google Scholar
Röntgen, W. C. (1878). Mittheilung einiger Versuche aus dem Gobiet der Capillarität. Wied. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, II. pp. 321–28. 1 Fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serle, G. F. C. (1913). Some methods of measuring the Surface Tension of Soap Solutions. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. XVII. pp. 285–99.Google Scholar
Shorter, S. A. (1912). Note on the Elasticity of Films and the Foaming of Solutions. Phil. Mag. (6), XXIV. pp. 629–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorter, S. A. (1914). Classification of Foaming Solutions. Phil. Mag. (6), XXVII. pp. 718–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermorel, V. and Dantony, E. (1910). Des principes généraux qui doivent présider á l'estlissement des formules insecticides. Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. CLL. pp. 1144–46.Google Scholar
Vermorel, V. (1911). Sur les bouilles anticryptogamiques mouillantes. Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. CLII. pp. 972–74.Google Scholar
Vermorel, V. (1912). Tension superficielle et pouvoir mouillant des insecticides el fongicides. Moyen de rendre mouillantes toutes les bouillies cupriques ou insecticides. Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. CLIV. pp. 1300–2.Google Scholar