Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:59:06.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. P. McGrath  and
F. J. Zhao
S. P. McGrath
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
F. J. Zhao
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were conducted to test the seed yield responses of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L., cvs Libravo or Falcon) to the addition of different rates of S fertilizer, at three N application rates, on a sandy loam at Woburn, Bedfordshire, in 1990/91, 1991/92 and 1993/94. Large increases in seed yields, ranging from 0·7 to 1·6 t/ha, or 42–267% on a relative scale, were obtained in response to the application of 40 kg S/ha with 180 and 230 kg N/ha treatments. The effects of S were highly significant in 1991/92 (P < 0·01) and 1993/94 (P < 0·001) and close to significant (P = 0·053) in 1990/91. The yield benefits were obtained mainly from the application of the first 10 kg S/ha and further yield increases were unlikely above 40 kg S/ha. Increasing N application from 180 to 230 kg/ha decreased seed yield in 1990/91 and 1993/94, when no S was applied. In contrast, seed yield was not increased by S at zero or low (50 or 100 kg/ha) N rates. The interactions between N and S on seed yield were significant (P < 0·05) in 1990/91 but not in the other two seasons. Application of S also increased seed oil content in 1993/94, when the degree of S deficiency was particularly severe. With an application of 230 kg N/ha, the crops took up 5–22 kg S/ha at maturity when no S was applied and 26–51 kg S/ha when 40 kg S/ha was applied. The utilization efficiency of the fertilizer S ranged from 50 to 73% in the three seasons. Although the concentrations of total N in plants were largely unaffected by S treatments, large amounts of NO3-N accumulated in the leaves of S-deficient plants in 1993/94. This indicates that N metabolism was disrupted by S deficiency. The concentrations of S and the N: S ratios in different tissues and the whole plant changed considerably with time. The concentration of S in leaves at early flowering was found to be the best index in predicting S deficiency in terms of seed yield, and a critical value of 3·8 mg/g was obtained. In comparison, the N: S ratio in leaves at early flowering was a much poorer predictor of S deficiency.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 126 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 53 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Catt, J. A., King, D. W. & Weir, A. H. (1975). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. I. Great Hill, Road Piece and Butt Close. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1974, Part 2, 5–28.Google Scholar
Ceccotti, S. P. & Messick, D. L. (1994). Increasing plant nutrient sulphur use in the European fertilizer industry. Agro-Food-lndustry Hi-Tech 5 (No. 3), 9–14.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., Kershaw, C. & Leech, P. (1990). Fertilizer use on farm crops in Great Britain: results from the survey of fertilizer practice, 1969–88. Outlook on Agriculture 19, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Environment (1992). The UK Environment. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Duke, S. H. & Reisenauer, H. M. (1986). Roles and requirements of sulfur in plant nutrition. In Sulfur in Agriculture, Agronomy Monograph No. 27 (Ed. Tabatabai, M. A.), pp. 123–168. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Fieldsend, J. & Milford, G. F. J. (1994). Changes in glucosinolates during crop development in single- and double-low genotypes of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus): I. Production and distribution in vegetative tissues and developing pods during development and potential role in the recycling of sulphur within the crop. Annals of Applied Biology 124, 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee (1993). Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. R. J. (1980). Nutrition of the Oilseed Rape Crop. London: Applied Science Publication.Google Scholar
Janzen, H. H. & Bettany, J. R. (1984 a). Sulfur nutrition of rapeseed: I. Influence of fertilizer nitrogen and sulfur rates. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, H. H. & Bettany, J. R. (1984 b). Sulfur nutrition of rapeseed: II. Effect of time of sulfur application. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. G., Stewart, J. W. B. & Bettany, J. R. (1983). Use of plant analysis to predict sulphur deficiency in rapeseed (Brassica napus and B. campestris). Canadian Journal of Soil Science 63, 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaife, A. & Burns, I. G. (1986). The sulphate-S/total S ratio in plants as an index of their sulphur status. Plant and Soil 91, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnug, E. (1989). Double low oilseed rape in West Germany: sulphur nutrition and glucosinolate levels. Aspects of Applied Biology 23, Production and protection of oilseed rape and other brassica crops, 67–82.Google Scholar
Spencer, K., Freney, J. R. & Jones, M. B. (1984). A preliminary testing of plant analysis procedures for the assessment of the sulfur status of oilseed rape. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, J. R., Campbell, G. W. & Smith, R. I. (1993). Acid Deposition in the United Kingdom 1991, LR959. Stevenage: Warren Spring Laboratory.Google Scholar
Syers, J. K., Skinner, R. J. & Curtin, D. (1987). Soil and Fertiliser Sulphur in U.K. Agriculture. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society, No 264. London: The Fertiliser Society.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. (1985). Revision of a code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) Aspects of Applied Biology 10, Field trials methods and data handling, 395–400.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Review Group on Acid Rain (1990). Acid Deposition in the United Kingdom 1986–1988, Third Report. Stevenage: Warren Spring Laboratory.Google Scholar
Walker, K. C. & Booth, E. J. (1992). Sulphur research on oilseed rape in Scotland. Sulphur in Agriculture 16, 15–19.Google Scholar
Withers, P. J. A. & O'Donnell, F. M. (1994). The response of double-low winter oilseed rape to fertiliser sulphur. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 66, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. & McGrath, S. P. (1994). Comparison of sulphur uptake by oilseed rape and the soil sulphur status of two adjacent fields with different soil series. Soil Use and Management 10, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. J., Evans, E. J., Bilsborrow, P. E. & Syers, J. K. (1993 a). Sulphur uptake and distribution in double and single low varieties of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant and Soil 150, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. J., Evans, E. J., Bilsborrow, P. E. & Syers, J. K. (1993 b). Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 63, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. J., Bilsborrow, P. E., Evans, E. J. & Syers, J. K. (1993 c). Sulphur turnover in the developing pods of single and double low varieties of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 62, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P. & Crosland, A. R. (1994). Comparison of three wet digestion methods for the determination of plant sulphur by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 25, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar