Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T00:29:41.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sugar content of bull semen and its reduction during storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

James Anderson
James Anderson
Affiliation:
Experimental Station, Naivasha, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The mean sugar content of bull semen was 470±11·7 mg. %. There was no relationship between the sugar content and the volume of the ejaculate, the number of sperm per c.mm., the initial motility and the maintenance of high motility during storage.

The mean percentage reduction in sugar after 24 hr. for undiluted semen stored at 10° C. was 23·85 ·1±76%. There was a significant positive correlation between the sugar reduction and initial motility, and a highly significant positive correlation between sugar reduction and the concentration of sperm. The negative correlation between reduction in sugar and the period for which good motility was retained on storage was not significant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 1946 , pp. 260 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERNCES

Anderson, J. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 32, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. (1946). J. Agric. Sci. 36, 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, A. (1933). Trans. Vet. Path., Orenburg Vet. Inst. no.1, 9. Abstr. in A. B. A. 1935, 3, 478.Google Scholar
Bernstein, A. & Slovohotov, I. (1933). Trans. Vet. Path. Orenburg Vet. Inst. no. 1, 26. Abstr. in A. B. A. 1935, 3, 478.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E. (1939). J. Exp. Zool. 81, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. P. & Williams, N. K. (1939). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 32nd Ann. Meet., p. 232.Google Scholar
Macleod, J. (1941). Amer. J. Physiol. 132, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1942). Human Fertility, 7, 129.Google Scholar
Mann, T. (1946). Nature, Lond., 157, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milovanov, V. K. (1934). Artificial Insemination o Livestock. Moscow-Leningrad: State Publishing House. Review in A. B. A. 1934, 2, 403.Google Scholar
Moore, B. H. & Mayer, D. T. (1941). Res. Bull. Mo Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 338.Google Scholar
Sergin, N. P. (1935). Probl. Zivotn. no. 12,100. Abstr in A. B. A. 1936, 4, 270.Google Scholar
Sergin, N. P. (1937). Probl. Zivotn. no. 12, 126. Abstin in A. B. C. 1939, 7, 181.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1931). J. Biol. Chem. 90, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar