Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:35:40.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the effect of supplementing a concentrate diet with roughages of different quality on the performance of Friesian steers. II. Growth rate, efficiency of food conversion and carcass yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. A. McCullough
T. A. McCullough
Affiliation:
Loughry Agricultural College, Gookstoxvn, Go. Tyrone, N. Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Concentrate diets supplemented with 5, 20 and 40% high- and low-quality hay were given ad libitum to British Friesian steers from 9 weeks of age to slaughter.

The performance of the animals was studied over 91 kg weight ranges from 91 to 363 kg live weight and from 9 weeks of age to slaughter. In the whole experimental period the daily live-weight gain was significantly greater on diets containing high-quality hay. There was also an increase in the daily live-weight gain in each of the weight ranges studied on diets supplemented with high-quality hay but this increase was not significant at the stage of growth from 272 to 363 kg live weight. As the level of concentrate in the diet increased there was a significant increase in the daily live-weight gain at each stage of growth studied and over the complete experimental period.

The mean feed conversion ratio was greater for diets containing low-quality hay. Except during the stage of growth from 272 to 363 kg live weight the proportion of hay in the diet significantly affected the mean concentrate conversion ratio. With increasing levels of hay in the diet there was a significant increase in the total dry-matter conversion ratio.

The conversion ratio of metabolizable energy was also increased on diets containing low-quality hay. The proportion of concentrate in the diet significantly affected the conversion ratio of metabolizable energy at all stages of growth studied.

There were significant differences in the killing-out percentages, weight and contents of the reticulo-rumen and the omasum plus abomasum expressed as a percentage of empty body weight, with increasing levels of hay in the diet. These measurements were not significantly affected by the quality of hay in the diet.

Indirect measurements of carcass composition indicated that the level of hay in the diet tended to affect the amount of fat in the carcass but the amount of lean was similar at the different ratios of concentrate to hay. The ratios of the weight of separable lean to the weight of separable bone in the 9–10–11th rib cut were similar at different levels of hay supplementation. The organoleptic appraisal of sample joints indicated that carcass quality was satisfactory.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 337 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Reseaech Council (1965). Recommended Procedures for Use in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1966). Nutritional problems arising in intensive animal production-energy aspects. Proc. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1964). The utilization of the energy of different rations by sheep and cattle for maintenance and for production. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. A. (1966). Problems in beef carcass evaluation. Proc. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh, pp. 117–24.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G. & Howe, P. E. (1946). Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 926.Google Scholar
McCullough, T. A. (1970a). A study of the effect of supplementing a concentrate diet with roughages of different quality on the performance of Friesian steers. I. Voluntary food intake and food utilization. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, T. A. (1970b). The effect of different ratios of concentrate to hay on the performance of Friesian steers. Rec. agric. Res. Minist. Agric. Nth. Ire. (in the Pross.)Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Lofgreen, G. P. & Garrett, W. N. (1960). A proposed method for removing sources of error in beef cattle feeding experiments. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. R., Ziegler, J. H., White, J. M., Kesler, E. M. & Watkins, J. L. (1964). Production and carcass characteristics of Holstein-Friesian bulls and steers slaughtered at 800 or 1000 pounds. J. Dairy Sci. 47, 179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, E. & Davies, G. M. (1967). Effect of breed, sex, type of cereal and supplementary hay upon the performance of beef cattle given high-concentrate diets. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., Aitken, J. N., Whitelaw, F. G., Macdearmid, A., Philip, E. B. & MacLeod, N. A. (1963). Intensive beef production. 3. Performance of Friesian steers given low-fibre diets. Anim. Prod. 5, 245–9.Google Scholar
Raven, A. M., Robinson, K. L., Irwin, J. H. D. & Forbes, T. J. (1966). Beef production from bulls and steers. 2. The evaluation of carcasses of animals fed experimental high-concentrate diets. Rec. agric. Res. Minist. Agric. Nth. Ire. 15, 129–48.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods (5th edn). Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Swan, H. & Lamming, G. E. (1967). Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 2. The effect of level of crude fibre in maize-based rations on the carcass composition of Friesian steers. Anim. Prod. 9, 203–8.Google Scholar
Warner, R. G., Flatt, W. P. & Loosli, J. K. (1956). Dietary factors influencing the development of the ruminant stomach. J. agric. Fd Cham. 4, 788–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. (1966). Carcass assessment and meat quality. The biological and economic assessment of beef. Beef production and marketing. Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc. 2, 83–90.Google Scholar