Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:06:06.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of growth in swards of timothy and meadow fescue III. The effect of two levels of nitrogen under two cutting treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Lambert
D. A. Lambert
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Pure swards of S. 48 timothy and S. 215 meadow fescue receiving approximately 52 or 156 lb. N per acre over a period of 8 months were cut (a) at anthesis and twice thereafter or (6) every 4 weeks. The number and weight of tillers and leaves and annual plot yields were determined.

2. Tiller numbers rose to their highest in spring and then declined throughout the summer. The higher rate of nitrogen increased tillers in the meadow fescue more than in the timothy; the system of frequent defoliation resulted in enhanced production of tillers in the low nitrogen swards of both species, so that maximum populations within a species were similar under the two levels of nitrogen.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , August 1962 , pp. 25 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberda, Th. (1957). Plant and Soil, 8, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brougham, R. W. (1958). Atist. J. agric. Res. 9, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. M. (1934). Plant Physiol. 9, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1959 a). Ann. Appl. Biol. 47, 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1959 b). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1959 c). Ann. Appl. Biol. 47, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, K. J. (1953). Physiol. Plant. 6, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, E. G. (1949). Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. 55 (7).Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1947). Ann. Bot. N.S. 11, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar