Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-2stsh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T07:05:02.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the sex-ratio and related phenomena. (7) The foetal sex-ratio in the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. S. Parkes
A. S. Parkes
Affiliation:
Beit Memorial Research Fellow. (From the Department of Physiology, University College, London.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Of 583 pig foetuses of all ages, 331 were found to be males and 252 females, giving a male percentage of 56·8, which is much higher than the approximate equality between the sexes that seems to exist at birth. This result confirms Jewell, who found a male percentage of 55 among 1000 cow foetuses.

2. These 583 pig foetuses when classified by weight (0–100 gm., 101–300 gm., 301+gm.) gave the following percentages of males for the respective groups, 59·1, 57·0, 53·2. In other words, the percentage of males decreases as gestation proceeds, a result which can only be brought about by a differential mortality of males and females. It would appear that the percentage at conception must be very near 60 per cent. or 150 males per 100 females.

3. The sex-ratios of foetuses from the left and right cornua show no significant difference, 55·0 for the right and 54·7 for the left.

4. The males were found to average about 7 per cent. heavier than the females.

5. There seems to be an inverse correlation between the number of foetuses in a horn and their average weight. Foetuses from the left cornu have a slightly greater weight than those from the right, and this may be connected with the slightly inferior fertility of this horn.

6. The excess of males at conception is discussed in the light of the implications of the chromosome mechanism of sex determination, and reference is made to the greater mortality of the males.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 1925 , pp. 284 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Auerbach, (1912). “Das wahre Geschlechtsverhältnis des Menschen.” Archiv f. Rassen. u. Gesellschaftsbiol. 9.Google Scholar
(2)Bernoulli, (1841). Handbuch der Populationstatislik.Google Scholar
(3)Biedl, , Peters, and Hofstätter, (1921). “Experimentelle Studien über die Einnistung und Weitenentwickelung des Eies im Uterus.” Zeits. f. Geburts. u. Gynäk. 84.Google Scholar
(4)Corner, (1921). “The Internal migration of the ovum.” Johns Hopkins Hospital Bull. 32.Google Scholar
(5)Dawson, (1921). The Causation of Sex. London, 3rd Ed.Google Scholar
(6)Ewart, (1922). Letter in Brit. Med. Jour. 02Google Scholar
(7)Goehlert, (1882). “Ueber die Vererbung der Haarfarben bei den Pferden.” Zeits. f. Ethnol. 14.Google Scholar
(8)Günther, (1923). “Letaldisposition und Sexualdisposition.” Naturwissenschaftliche Korrespondenz, 1.Google Scholar
(9)Hammond, (1921). “Factors controlling Fertility and foetal Atrophy.” Jour. Agri. Sci. 11.Google Scholar
(10)Heape, (1906). The Breeding Industry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
(11)Hoffmann, (1885). “Mitteilung über Abortus.” Deutsche Zeitschr. für Tiermedizin, 26.Google Scholar
(12)Jewell, (1921). “Sex-ratios in Foetal cattle.” Biol. Bull. 41.Google Scholar
(13)Jendrassik, (1911). “Ueber die Frage des Knabengeburten-Ueberschuss und über andere Hereditätsprobleme.” Deutsche mediz. Wochenschr. 37.Google Scholar
(14)King, (1915). “On the weight of the Albino Rat at Birth, and the factors that influence it.” Anat. Rec. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Lenhossek, (1903). Das Problem der geschlechtsbestimmenden Ursachen. Jena.Google Scholar
(16)Long, J. (1906). The Book of the Pig.Google Scholar
(17)Long, J. A. and Evans, (1922). The Oestrous Cycle in the Rat and Associated Phenomena. Mem. Univ. California, 6.Google Scholar
(18)Long, C. N. H. and Parkes, (1924). “On the Nature of Foetal Re-absorption.” Biochem. Jour. 18.Google Scholar
(19)Lowrey, (1911). “Prenatal growth in the Pig.” Am. Jour. Anat. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Machens, (1915). “Fruchtbarkeit und Geschlechtsverhältnis beim veredelten Landsohwein.” Berliner Tierärztliclie Wochenschrift, 31.Google Scholar
(21)Parker, (1914) “Sex-Determination.” Sci. 39.Google ScholarPubMed
(22)Parker, and Bullard, (1913). “On the size of litters and the number of Nipples in Swine.” Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sci. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Parkes, (1924). “Studies on the Sex-ratio and Related Phenomena. (1) Foetal retrogression in Mice.” Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 95.Google Scholar
(24)Parkes, (1923). “Studies on the Sex-ratio and Related Phenomena. (3) Influence of size of Litter.” Ann. Appl. Biol. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Parkes, (1923). “Studies on the Sex-ratio and Related Phenomena. (4) Frequencies of sex combinations in Pig Litters.” Biometrika, 15.Google Scholar
(26)Parkes, (1924). “Fertility in Mice.” Brit. Jour. Exp. Biol. 2.Google Scholar
(27)Robinson, (1921). “Prenatal Death.” Edin. Med. Journ. 26.Google Scholar