Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:02:47.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Lime Requirements of Certain Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Henry Beougham Hutchinson  and
Kenneth MacLennan
Henry Beougham Hutchinson
Affiliation:
(Carnegie Research Fellow).
Kenneth MacLennan
Affiliation:
(Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The experimental results described in the two parts of the paper may be summarised thus:

Part I. Lime Requirements for Sterilisation Purposes.

(1) The capacity to produce partial sterilisation effects is a property belonging to calcium oxide (caustic lime), but not to calcium carbonate (chalk, limestone, marl, etc.).

(2) The amount of lime necessary to produce specific effects in different soils has been found to vary greatly and it is not possible to make any general recommendations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1915 , pp. 75 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Van, Bemmelen, Die Absorption, Steintopf, Dresden.Google Scholar
2.Baumann, , Mitt. d. K. Bayr. Moorkulturanstalt, Part 3.Google Scholar
Baumann, and Gully, , Mitt. d. K. Bayr. Moorkulturanstalt., Part 4.Google Scholar
3.Rindell, , Internat. Mitt, für Bodenkunde, 1911, 1, 6780.Google Scholar
4.Tacke, and Süchting, , Landw. Jahrb., 1911, 41, 717–754.Google Scholar
5.Hutchinson, and MacLennan, , This Journal, 1914, 6, 302.Google Scholar
6.Way, , Journ. Roy. Agric. Soc., 1850, 11, 313, and 1854, 15, 491.Google Scholar
7.Hollemann, , Landw. Vers. Stat., 1892, 41, 38.Google Scholar
8.Immendorff, , Fifth Internat. Cong. App. Chem., Berlin, 1903, 3, 740.Google Scholar
9.Sestini, , Ann. Agron., 1897, 23, 326.Google Scholar
10.Mayer, , Landw. Vers. Stat., 1899, 51, 339.Google Scholar
11.Heinrich, , Mergel und Mergeln, Berlin, 1896.Google Scholar
12.Maercker, , Jahresber. d. Agric. Chem. Vers. Stat., Halle, 1896.Google Scholar
13.Orth, , Arb. d. deutsch. Landw. Ges., 1896.Google Scholar
14.Stützer, and Hartleb, , Mitt. Landw. Inst., Breslau, 1899, 1, 101.Google Scholar
15.Kellner, , Landw. Vers. Stat., 1887, 33, 359.Google Scholar
16.Meyer, , Landw. Jahrb., 1900, 29, 913, and 1910, 39, Ergänz. Bd., 3, 284.Google Scholar
17.Weibull, , Meddelande fran Alnarps Laboratorium, 9, 1909.Google Scholar
18.Christensen, and Larsen, , Centr. Bakt. Par., ii, 1911, 29, 358.Google Scholar
19.Loew, , Zeitsch. für Landw. Versuchswesen in Oesterreich, 1909, 462.Google Scholar
20.Daikuhara, , Bull. Jap. Imp. Centr. Agric. Exp. Stat., 1914, 2, 1–40.Google Scholar
21.Baumann, and Gully, , Naturwiss. Zeitsch. für Forst und Landw., 1908, 1–6.Google Scholar
22.Albert, , Zeitsch. angew. Chemie, 1909, 22, 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Tacke, , Chem. Zeit., 1897, 22, 174.Google Scholar
24.Süchting, , Zeitsch. angew. Chemie, 1908, 21, 1.Google Scholar
25.Wheeler, Hartwell and Sargent, , Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1900, 22, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hopkins, Knox and Pettit, , Proc. 19th Ann. Conv. Agric. Chem., Washington, 1902.Google Scholar
27.Hopkins, , “Soil Fertility and Permanent Agriculture,” and U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Bureau of Chem., Bull 107, 20.Google Scholar
28.Daikuhara, , loc. cit., p. 22.Google Scholar
29.Loew, , Bull. 13, Porto Rico Agric. Exp. Stat., 1913, 7.Google Scholar
30.Jones, , American Fertiliser, 1913, 39, 29.Google Scholar
31.Wheeler, Hastwell and Sargent, , loc. cit.Google Scholar
32.Albert, , loc. cit.Google Scholar
33.Süchting, and Arnd, , Zeitsch. angew. Chem., 1910, 23, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Lyon, and Bizzell, , Journ. Ind. and Eng. Chem., 1913, 5, 1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Veitch, , Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1902, 24, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Gregoire, Hendrick, Carpiaux, and Germain, , Ann. Stat. Agron. Gembloux, 1913, 2, 87.Google Scholar
37.Hutchinson, and MacLennan, , loc. cit.Google Scholar
38.Voelcker, , Journ. Roy. Agric. Soc., 1898–1913.Google Scholar
39.Hall, and Russell, , Rep. on the Agriculture and Soils of Kent, Surrey and Sussex, 1911; also This Journal, 1911, 4, 216.Google Scholar
40.Russell, , This Journal, 1910, 3, 243.Google Scholar