Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:12:37.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the cattle of Northern Rhodesia. II. The carcass characters of steers from normal veld grazing and supplemented with salt and protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. A. Walker
C. A. Walker
Affiliation:
Central Research Station, Mazabuka, Northern Rhodesia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The effect upon the carcass characters of indigenous steers of supplementing veld grazing with two levels of salt with and without protein in the dry season has been investigated.

2. The feeding of 1 oz. of salt, found in part I (Walker, 1958) to speed up growth to a significant degree, was shown also to have speeded up maturity in carcass characters.

3. No benefit was obtained from adding a dry season protein supplement to the salt; the feeding of protein without salt produced only slight insignificant effects.

4. The addition of 2 oz. supplementary salt noted in part I as having an inhibitory effect on growth by comparison with the lower salt level has been shown to extend to the carcass characters.

5. Additional evidence has been found in the carcass characters to give further support to the suggestion that the tropical indigenous animal possesses the capacity for stopping growth during adverse nutritional conditions and continuing again afterwards.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , August 1958 , pp. 123 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, J. G. (1956). Thesis, Univ. Toronto.Google Scholar
Black, W. H. & Knapp, B. (1936). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 29th Meeting.Google Scholar
Black, W. H. & Knapp, B. (1938 a). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 31st Meeting.Google Scholar
Black, W. H. & Knapp, B. (1938 b). J. Agric. Res. 56, 465–72.Google Scholar
Crowther, C. (1931). J. R. Agric. Sci. 92, 1–43.Google Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1957). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of the Mutton Qualities of Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1936). Festschrift, Prof. Duerst, Berne.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1939). Onderstepoort. J. Vet. Sci. 12, 379.Google Scholar
Kaunity, H. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1932). Bull. Tex. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 471.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. (1951). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 19, 1–24.Google Scholar
Murray, C. A. & Romyn, A. E. (1937 a). Rhod. Agric. J. 34, no. 5.Google Scholar
Murray, C. A. & Romyn, A. E. (1937 b). Rhod. Agric. J. 34, no. 7.Google Scholar
Raath, J. C. (1944 b). Thesis, Univ. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. B. (1956). Rhod. Agric. J. 53, 969–82.Google Scholar
Vorster, T. H. (1954). Rhod. Agric. J. 51, 428–73.Google Scholar
Walker, C. A. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar