Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:42:44.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the aerobic deterioration of whole-crop cereal silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. K. Woolford
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, SL6 5LR, Berkshire
K. K. Bolsen
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, SL6 5LR, Berkshire
Lesley A. Peartt
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, SL6 5LR, Berkshire

Summary

As a result of the treatment of made whole-crop barley silage with antimicrobial agents which are specifically inhibitory to fungi or bacteria, it was shown that the subsequent aerobic deterioration was essentially caused by yeasts. These microorganisms were instrumental in the rise in pH, the increase in temperature and the loss of dry matter observed. The filamentous fungi, like one group of bacteria (the streptomycetes), apparently had no part in the process. Bacteria, such as the lactobacilli and particularly proteolytic bacteria, may have had a role in the terminal stages of deterioration, although it was considered more likely that the yeasts again were involved.

The whole-crop wheat silage employed in this work was stable in air, a factor attributed to the combined antimicrobial effects of butyric acid present and the relatively high dry-matter content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, T. (1975). Beeinflussung der Nachgarung durch Siliermittel. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 21, 5564.Google Scholar
Beck, T. (1978). The microbiology of silage fermentation. In Fermentation of Silage - a Review (ed. McCullough, M.E.), pp. 63115. West Des Moines, Iowa: National Feed Ingredients Association.Google Scholar
Beck, T. & Gross, F. (1964). Ursachen der unterschiedlichen Haltbarkeit von Gärfutter. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 10, 298312.Google Scholar
Bolsen, K. K., Ilg, H. J. & Nuwanyakpa, M. (1981). NaOH and Ensilo PlusR additives for wheat silage and alfalfa haylage for growing steers. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Report of Progress 394, 5498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan-Jones, D. G. & Whittenbury, R. (1969). Haematin-dependent oxidative phosphorylation in Streptococcus faecalis. Journal of General Microbiology 58, 247260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawshaw, R., Thorne, D. M. & Llewelyn, R. H. (1980). The effects of formic and propionic acids on the aerobic deterioration of grass silage in laboratory units. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 685694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, R. & Woolford, M. K. (1979). Aerobic deterioration of silage in and out of the silo. ADAS Quarterly Review 34, 151178.Google Scholar
Daniel, P., Honig, H., Weise, F. & Zimmer, E. (1970). Wirking von propionsaure bei der Grünfuttersilierung. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 16, 239252.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, F. & Beck, T. (1970). Untersuohungen über die Hemmung von aeroben Abbauprozessen durch Propionsaure bei der Auslagerung on Gärfutter. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 16, 114.Google Scholar
Honig, H. & Woolford, M. K. (1980). Changes in silage on exposure to air. Occasional Symposium of the British Grassland Society, no. 11, pp. 7686.Google Scholar
Kibe, K., Ewart, J. M. & McDonald, P. (1977). Chemical studies with silage microorganisms in artificial media and sterile herbages. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 355364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küster, E. & Williams, S. T. (1964). Selection of media for isolation of streptomycetes. Nature, London 202, 928929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, N. J., Ely, L. O. & Sudweeks, E. M. (1980). Aerobic deterioration of wheat, lucerne and maize silages prepared with Lactobacillus acidophilus and a Candida spp. Journal of A pplied Bacteriology 49, 7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohyama, Y. & Hara, S. (1975). Growth of yeasts isolated from silages on various media and its relationship to aerobic deterioration of silage. Japanese Journal of Zoolechnical Science 46, 713721.Google Scholar
Whittenbury, R. (1964). Hydrogen peroxide formation and catalase activity in the lactic acid bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 35, 1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1978). Paraformaldehyde as a silage additive. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 2329.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K. (1976). A preliminary investigation into the role of yeasts in the ensiling process. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 41, 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, M. K. (1977). Studies on the significance of three Bacillus species to the ensiling process. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 43, 447452.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K. (1978). The aerobic deterioration of silage. ARC Research Review 4, 812.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K. & Cook, J. E. (1978). A note on the effect on the aerobic deterioration of maize silage of the manipulation of the microflora by means of antibiotics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 8994.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K., Honig, H. & Fenlon, J. S. (1977). Untersuchungen über aeroben Umsetzungen in Silage mit Hilfe einer Labortechnik. 1. Beschreibung und statistische Bewertung der Methode. Das Wirtechaftseigene Futter 23, 1022.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K., Honig, H. & Fenlon, J. S. (1978). Untersuchungen über aeroben Umsetzungen in Silage mit Hilfe einer Labortechnik. 2. Mikrobiologische, physikalische und chemische Veranderungen Wahrend des aeroben Abbaus von Maissilage. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 24, 125139.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K., Honig, H. & Fenlon, J. S. (1979). Untersuchungen über aeroben Umsetzungen in Silage mit Hilfe einer Labortechnik. 3. Mikrobiologische, physikalische und chemische Veranderungen Wahrend des aeroben Abbaus in frischer und angewelkter grassilage. Dos Wirtschaftseigene Futter 25, 158177.Google Scholar