Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:03:27.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes:7. Variability in the growth of individual foetuses in relation to intra-uterine factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. McDonald
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
C. Fraser
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

The weights of 44 twin foetuses, 99 triplets and 44 quadruplets, varying in gestational age from 55 to 145 days, were studied in relation to age, sex, litter size, uterine position, placental structure and weight, and ovulation rate. Triplet and quadruplet foetuses were more variable in weight, within litters, than were twins. The difference increased with foetal age and was attributed to increased competition between foetuses which were located within the same horn of the uterus. The effect was largely associated with differences in placental development, i.e. numbers of cotyledons and weight, but those differences did not entirely account for the reduction in foetal weight with increasing litter size. Differences in placental development, arising from embryo mortality, also accounted for the reduction in foetal weight when ovulation rate exceeded litter size. In contrast, differences in foetal weight associated with the sex of the foetuses were only partly mediated by differences in cotyledon weight. Foetuses in the larger litters are thus not only lighter in weight but are more variable in weight, the increased variability being controlled by events in early pregnancy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boshier, D. P. & Moriarty, K. M. (1970). Some effects on the conceptus of prior immunological sensitization of ewes to the sire. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 21, 495500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, R. K. & Prior, R. L. (1978). Uterine blood flow and nutrient uptake during late gestation in ewes with different number of fetuses. Journal of Animal Science 46, 189200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, H. P. & Purser, A. F. (1957). Competition inutero between twin lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edey, T. N. (1976). Embryo mortality. In Sheep Breeding. Proceedings of the 1976 International Congress, Muresk and Perth (ed. Tomes, G. J., Robertson, D. E. and Lightfoot, R. J.), pp. 400410.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1967). Factors affecting the gestation length in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 191194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Robinson, J. J. & McDonald, I. (1980). Relationships among uterine and placental factors in prolific ewes and their relevance to variations in foetal weight. Animal Production 30, 115124.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., Fraser, C. & Crofts, R. M. J. (1977). Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 1. Growth of the products of conception. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 539552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., McHattie, I. & Pennie, K. (1978). Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 4. Sequential changes in the maternal body during pregnancy. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar