Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:30:50.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on forage cell walls: 2. Conditions for alkali treatment of rice straw and rice hulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. R. McManus  and
C. C. Choung
W. R. McManus
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, N.S.W., Australia2033
C. C. Choung
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, N.S.W., Australia2033
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A number of studies on sodium hydroxide treatment of rice hulls and straw are reported. Alkali levels ranged from 0 to 100 g NaOH/100 g for hulls and from 0 to 50 g NaOH/100 g for straw.

Effects of prior grinding, prior irradiation with gamma rays (0–50 Mrads), alkali reaction time (0–24 h), neutralization of excess residual alkali with acids, and rinsing effects were studied in terms of increased salt (ash) content, test material solubility in water and in vitro and in vivo (terylene bag) fermentation.

Moderate increases in solubility and digestibility of straw followed irradiation but not for hulls. Major increases were found for irradiated straw further treated with alkali but hulls were little affected by 5 g NaOH/100 g D.M. except at the 50 Mrad level. Nutrient fortification of inocula media did not help dissimilation. Grinding had little effect on degradation of alkali-treated hulls. Straw responses were greater than for hulls.

Alkali treatment removed encrusting silica and lignin from rice hulls and increased in vitro and in vivo digestibility. Above levels of 12·5 g NaOH/100 g dry matter in vitro digestibility was depressed unless residual alkali was neutralized. Alkali-treated hulls were reduced in silica content better by rinsing or by no neutralization and no rinsing: neutralization or neutralization followed by rinsing were less effective. Lignin was best removed by alkali or alkali and acid without rinsing. Alkali reaction time on hulls was not critical, but alkali concentration was.

Animal trials indicated useful intake and digestive responses to alkali-treated rice hulls. Raw rice hulls were rejected by sheep.

When fed in a mixed diet with lucerne chaff (40% whole rice hull, 60% lucerne chaff) daily voluntary intake of rice hull dry matter was 345 g (nil NaOH); 361 g (10 g NaOH/ 100 g rice hull); 193 g (20 g NaOH/100 g rice hull) with apparent dry-matter digestibility values for the hulls of 20%, 41% and 51% respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , June 1976 , pp. 453 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

, B.A.E. (1974). Crop products. National Agricultural Outlook Conference. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Canberra, Australia 3, 1–15.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilisation of food by dairy cows. I. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigham, M. L., McManus, W. R. & Edwards, G. B. (1973). Whole wheat grain feeding of lambs. III. Rumen metabolic responses and animal physiological adjustment to mineral buffer supplements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 425–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, C. A. Jr (1904). The chemical composition and feeding value of rice products. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin 77, 430.Google Scholar
Carmona, J. F. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1972). The digestibility and acceptability to sheep of chopped or milled straw soaked or sprayed with alkali. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. I. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, B. E., Neal, E. M. & Riggs, J. K. (1965). Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Beeville Technical Rep. No. 1.Google Scholar
Donefer, E., Adeleye, I. D. A. & Jones, T. O. A. C. (1969). Effects of urea supplementation on the nutritive value of NaOH-treated straw. In Cellulases and Their Applications (ed. Gould, R. F.). Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. B., McManus, W. R. & Bigham, M. L. (1971). Effect of carbon chain length upon extraction of volatile fatty acids from rumen liquor. Journal of Chromatography 63, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feiger, B. A., Chopping, A. F. & Tucker, P. W. (1947). Making use of rice hulls. Rice Journal 50, 9–25.Google Scholar
Garrido, M. L. (1964). Determination of sulphur in plant material. Analyst, London 89, 61–6.Google Scholar
Godden, W. (1920). The digestibility of straw after treatment with soda. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 10, 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggolz, J., Kohler, G. O. & Klopfenstein, T. J. (1971). Composition and improvement of grass straw for ruminant nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 33, 151–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haun, J. L. (1970). Chapters 1–3: Hemicullulose. In Handbook of pulp and paper technology, 2nd ed. (ed. Britt, K.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1971). The utilisation of alkali-treated straw by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 951–62.Google Scholar
Huffman, J. G., Kitts, W. D. & Krishnamurti, C. R. (1971). Effects of alkali treatment and gamma irradiation on the chemical composition and in vitro rumen digestibility of certain species of wood. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 457–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutanuwatr, N., Hinds, F. C. & Davis, C. L. (1974). An evaluation of methods for improving the in vitro digestibility of rice hulls. Journal of Animal Science 38, 140–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. H. P. & Handreck, K. A. (1965). Studies of silica in the oat plant. III. Uptake of silica from soils by the plant. Plant and Soil 23, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. H. P. & Milne, A. A. (1963). Studies of silica in the oat plant. 1. Chemical and physical properties of the silica. Plant and Soil 18, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. H. P., Milne, A. A. & Woodham, S. M. (1963). Studies of silica in the oat plant. II. Distribution of the silica in the plant. Plant and Soil 18, 358–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, F. et al. (1900). Landw vers. Sta. 53, 302. (As cited by Godden (1920.)Google Scholar
McCartor, M. M., England, M. W. & Hefley, H. M. (1972). Effect of various roughages in high concentrate beef cattle diets on animal performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 34, 142–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougal, E. I. (1948). Studies on ruminant saliva. I. The composition and output of sheep saliva. Biochemistry Journal 43, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Bigham, M. L. & Edwards, G. B. (1972). Whole wheat grain feeding of lambs. 1. Production responses to mineral buffer supplements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 331–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Dudzinski, M. L. & Arnold, G. W. (1967). Estimation of herbage intake from nitrogen, copper, magnesium and silicon concentrations in faeces. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Manta, L., McFarlane, J. D. & Gray, C. (1972 a). The effect of diet supplements and gamma irradiation on dissimilation of low-quality roughages by ruminants. 1. Studies on the terylene bag technique and effects of supplementation of base ration. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Manta, L., McFarlane, J. D. & Gray, C. (1972 b). The effects of diet supplements and gamma irradiation on dissimilation of low quality roughages by ruminants. II. Effect of gamma irradiation and urea supplementation on dissimilation in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Manta, L., McFarlane, J. D. & Gray, C. (1972 c). The effect of diet supplements and gamma irradiation on dissimilation of low quality roughages by ruminants. III. Effects of feeding gamma-irradiated base diets of wheaten straw to sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeng, W. J. & Mowat, D. N. (1971). Digestibility of NaOH-straw with alfalfa silage. Journal of Animal Science 33, 1168 (abstract).Google Scholar
Mellenberger, R. W., Salter, L. D., Millet, M. A. & Baker, A. J. (1971). Digestion of aspen, alkalitreated aspen, and aspen bark by goats. Journal of Animal Science 32, 756–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minson, D. J. (1963). The effect of pelleting and wafering on the feeding value of roughage – A review. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1971). Influence of lignin and silicon on a summative system for assessing the organic matter digestibility of panicum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 589–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noland, P. R. & Gainer, J. H. (1953). The use of rice hulls as a roughage for wintering steer calves and for gestating-lactating ewes. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, no. 538, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Oh, J. H., Weir, W. C. & Longhurst, W. M. (1971). Feed value for sheep of corn stalks, rice straw and barley straw as compared with alfalfa. Journal of Animal Science 32, 343–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew, J. C. & Weyna, P. (1962). Fine grinding, enzyme digestion and the lignin-cellulose bond in wood. TAPPI 45, 247–52.Google Scholar
Rusoff, C. L., Frye, J. B. & Epps, E. A. (1956). A look at uses for rice hulls. Hulls fed to cattle produce no ill effects. Rice Journal 59, 28 (only).Google Scholar
Saxena, S. K., Otterby, D. E., Donker, J. D. & Good, A. L. (1971). Effects of feeding alkali-treated oat straw supplemented with soybean meal or nonprotein nitrogen on growth of lambs and on certain blood and rumen liquor parameters. Journal of Animal Science 33, 485–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, M. & Jackson, M. G. (1971). The effect of different levels of sodium hydroxide spray treatment of wheat straw on consumption and digestibility by cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. S., Nelson, A. B. & Boggino, J. A. (1971). Digestibility of forages in vitro as affected by content of ‘silica’. Journal of Animal Science 33, 466–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. S., Smith, E. C., Torre, R. & Neumann, A. L. (1971). Soluble silica in rumen cultures. Journal of Animal Science 33, 246 (abstract).Google Scholar
Stranks, D. W. (1959). Fermenting wood substrates with a rumen cellulolytic bacterium. Forest Products Journal 9, 228–33.Google Scholar
Tarkow, H. & Feist, W. C. (1969). A mechanism for improving digestibility of ligno-cellulose materials with dilute alkali and liquid ammonia. In Celluloses and Their Applications. Advances in Chemistry series, no. 95 (ed. Gould, Robert F.). Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. British Grassland Society Journal 18, 104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, A. D., Furr, R. D., Hansen, K. R., Sherrod, L. B. & Word, J. D. (1969). Utilisation of rice hulls in cattle finishing rations. Journal of Animal Science 29, 792–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1962). Trace Elements in Human and Animal Nutrition, 2nd ed.New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Proceedings American Feed Manufacturers Association Nutrition Council, p. 103.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Jones, L. H. P. (1968). Effect of silica in forages upon digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1644–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Wine, R. H. & Moore, L. A. (1966). Estimation of the true digestibility of forages by the in vitro digestion of cell walls. Proceedings International Grasslands Congress, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 438–41.Google Scholar
Warwicker, J. O. & Wright, A. C. (1967). Function of sheets of cellulose chains in swelling reactions on cellulose. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 11, 659–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1967). Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. 2. Studies with wheaten hay. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 983–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. W. (1966). Utilisation of ammoniated rice hulls by beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 25, 25–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T. W. & Reynolds, W. L. (1969). Various sources and levels of roughage in steer rations. Journal of Animal Science 28, 705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. K. & Pigden, W. (1964). Effect of a sodium hydroxide treatment on the utilisation of wheat straw and poplar wood by rumen microorganisms. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 44, 122–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar