Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:07:00.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of the skeleton of the sheep. IV. The effects and interactions of dietary supplements of calcium, phosphorus, cod-liver oil and energy, as starch, on the skeleton of growing blackface wethers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Benzie
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
A. W. Boyne
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
A. C. Dalgarno
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
J. Duckworth
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
R. Hill
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland

Extract

1. A factorial experiment on wether hoggs was carried out to examine the effects on bone growth and composition and on blood composition of four dietary factors. The factors were extra calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, and energy in the form of starch, and each was fed in all possible combinations, so that there were sixteen dietary treatment groups in all. Each group consisted of three animals.

2. Serum calcium and blood inorganic phosphorus concentrations were determined monthly, and radiographs of most parts of the skeleton were taken at the beginning and end of the experiment. After about 6 months on the experimental diets the animals were killed and the ash weights and percentage of ash of different parts of the skeleton and of the whole skeleton were determined. Live-weight changes and food intakes were also measured.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, E. D. & Cunningham, I. J. (1945). N. Z. J. Sci. Tech. 27 A, 223.Google Scholar
Auchinachie, D. W. & Fraser, A. H. H. (1932). J. Agric. Sci. 22, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R. (1957). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 38A, 583.Google Scholar
Benzie, D., Boyne, A. W., Daloabno, A. C., Duckworth, J., Hill, R. & Walker, D. M. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzie, D., Boyne, A. W., Dalgarno, A. C., Duckworth, J., Hill, R. & Walker, D. M. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzie, D., Boyne, A. W., Dalgarno, A. C., Duckworth, J. & Hill, R. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, T. J. & Stewart, J. (1932–33). 3rd Rep. of the Director, Inst. Anim. Pathol. Univ. Camb., p. 33.Google Scholar
Bowes, H. G. (1932). Vet. J. 88, 209.Google Scholar
Butler, E. J., Nisbet, D. I. & Robertson, J. M. (1957). J. Comp. Path. 67, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Kon, S. K. & Porter, J. W. G. (1956). Brit. Med. Bull. 12, 61.Google Scholar
Cresswell, E. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, I. J. (1957). N.Z. Vet. J. 5, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, H. H. (1920). Amer. J. Anat. 26, 237.Google Scholar
Duckworth, J., Gobden, W. & Thomson, W. (1943). J. Agric. Sci. 33, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, G. (1954). Nature, Land., 173, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, W., Orr, J. B., Wood, T. B. & Crichton, A. (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, T. K. (1951 a). Brit. J. Nutr. 5, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, T. K. (1951 b). Brit. J. Nutr. 5, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, T. K. & Bartrum, P. (1948). Aust. Vet. J. 24, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, L. W. N. (1943). Aust. Vet. J. 19, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, L. W. N. (1954). N.Z. Vet. J. 2, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, M. C. (1934–35). 4th Rep. of the Director, Inst. Anim. Pathol. Univ. Camb., p. 111.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H. & Stamp, J. T. (1957). Sheep Husbandry and Diseases. London: P. Crosby Lockwood and Son.Google Scholar
Grant, A. B. (1954). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 14, 77.Google Scholar
Grant, A. B. (1956). Proc. 1th Int. Grassland Congr. p. 397.Google Scholar
Grant, A. B. & O'Hara, P. B. (1957). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 38 A, 548.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep, p. 148. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. J. & Peirce, A. W. (1934). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. No. 77.Google Scholar
Meek, A. (1901). Veterinarian, Lond., 74, 7.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & McClure, F. J. (1937). Bull. Nat. Res. Coun., Wash., no. 99.Google Scholar
Piercy, S. E. (1934 a). Vet. J. 90, 53.Google Scholar
Piercy, S. E. (1934 b). Vet. J. 90, 223.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C. (1934). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Stat. no. 336.Google Scholar
Shanks, P. L. & Donald, L. G. (1955). Vet. Rec. 67, 312.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (19341935). 4th Rep. of the Director, Inst. Anim. Pathol. Univ. Camb., p. 179.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. L. (1933). Vet. J. 89, 63.Google Scholar
Theiler, A. (1934). Vet. J. 90, 143.Google Scholar
Thomlinson, J. R. (19531954). Scot. Agric. 33, 160.Google Scholar
United States Nat. Res. Coun. (1957). Recommended nutrient allowances for sheep.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weits, J. (1956). Meded. LandbHoogesch. Wageningen, no. 1, 56, 1.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar