Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:42:44.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Starch granule size distribution in wheat grain in relation to phosphorus fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

Y. NI ,
Z. WANG ,
Y. YIN ,
W. LI ,
S. YAN  and
T. CAI
Y. NI
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
Z. WANG*
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
Y. YIN
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
W. LI
Affiliation:
College of Plant Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui, P. R. China
S. YAN
Affiliation:
College of Plant Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui, P. R. China
T. CAI
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Starch granule size distribution of wheat is an important characteristic that can affect its chemical composition and functionality. Phosphorus (P) fertilization has been studied extensively; however, little is known about its impact on starch granule size distribution in wheat. In the present study, two high-yield winter wheat cultivars were grown under different P fertilization conditions to evaluate its effect on starch granule size distribution and starch components in wheat grains at maturity. P fertilization resulted in a significant increase in the proportions (both by volume and by surface area) of B-type (<9·9 μm equivalent diameter (e.d.)) starch granules, with a reduction in those of A-type (>9·9 μm e.d.) starch granules. The P fertilization also increased starch content, amylose content and amylopectin content at maturity. However, P fertilization conditions significantly reduced the ratio of amylose to amylopectin, which showed a significant positive relationship with the volume proportion of granules 22·8–42·8 μm e.d. but was negatively related to the volume proportion of granules 2·8–9·9 μm e.d.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 150 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 45 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmadi, A. & Baker, D. A. (2001). The effect of water stress on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of the sucrose to starch pathway in wheat. Plant Growth Regulation 35, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, D. B., Zayas, I., Kaleikau, L. & Pomeranz, Y. (1990). Size distribution of wheat starch granules during endosperm development. Cereal Chemistry 67, 59–63.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, C., Bekes, F., Gras, P. W., Barlow, E. W. & Wrigley, C. W. (1995). Identification of wheat genotypes tolerant to the effects of heat stress on grain quality. Cereal Chemistry 72, 539–544.Google Scholar
Chiotelli, E. & Meste, M. L. (2002). Effect of small and the large wheat starch granules on thermo mechanical behavior of starch. Cereal Chemistry 79, 286–293.Google Scholar
Dai, Z. M., Yin, Y. P. & Wang, Z. L. (2009). Starch granule size distribution from seven wheat cultivars under different water regimes. Cereal Chemistry 86, 82–87.Google Scholar
Dai, Z. M., Yin, Y. P., Zhang, M., Li, W. Y., Yan, S. H., Cai, R. G. & Wang, Z. L. (2008). Starch granule size distribution in wheat grains under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Acta Agronomica Sinica 34, 795–802.Google Scholar
Dengate, H. & Meredith, P. (1984). Variation in size distribution of starch granules from wheat grain. Journal of Cereal Science 3, 83–90.Google Scholar
He, Z. F. (1985). Analysis Technique for Grain Quality in Cereals and Oils. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Hurkman, W. J., McCue, K. F., Altenbach, S. B., Korn, A., Tanaka, C. K., Kothari, K. M., Johnson, E. L., Bechtel, D. B., Wilson, J. D., Anderson, O. D. & Du Pont, F. M. (2003). Effect of temperature on expression of genes encoding enzymes for starch biosynthesis in developing wheat endosperm. Plant Science 164, 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. S. & Huber, K. C. (2008). Channels within soft wheat starch A- and B-type granules. Journal of Cereal Science 48, 159–172.Google Scholar
Lazaro, L., Abbate, P. E., Cogliatti, D. H. & Andrade, F. H. (2010). Relationship between yield, growth and spike weight in wheat under phosphorus deficiency and shading. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 83–93.Google Scholar
Li, W., Yan, S., Yin, Y. & Wang, Z. (2010). Starch granule size distribution in wheat grain in relation to shading after anthesis. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. Y., Yin, Y. P., Yan, S. H., Dai, Z. M., Li, Y., Liang, T. B., Geng, Q. H. & Wang, Z. L. (2008). Effect of shading after anthesis on starch accumulation and activities of the related enzymes in wheat grain. Acta Agronomica Sinica 34, 632–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeboom, N., Chang, P. R. & Tyler, R. T. (2004). Analytical, biochemical and physicochemical aspects of starch granule size, with emphasis on small granule starches: a review. Starch – Stärke 56, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malouf, R. B. & Hoseney, R. C. (1992). Wheat hardness. I. A method to measure endosperm tensile strength using tablets made from wheat flour. Cereal Chemistry 69, 164–168.Google Scholar
Morrison, W. R. & Scott, D. C. (1986). Measurement of the dimensions of wheat starch granule populations using a Coulter Counter with 100-channel analyzer. Journal of Cereal Science 4, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. H., Wilson, J. D., Chung, O. K. & Seib, P. A. (2004). Size distribution and properties of wheat starch granules in relation to crumb grain score of pup-loaf bread. Cereal Chemistry 81, 699–704.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., Wilson, J. D. & Seabourn, B. W. (2009). Starch granules size distribution of hard red winter and hard red spring wheat: its effects on mixing and bread making quality. Journal of Cereal Science 49, 98–105.Google Scholar
Peng, M., Gao, M., Abdel-Aal, E. S. M., Hucl, P. & Chibbar, R. N. (1999). Separation and characterization of A- and B-type starch granules in wheat endosperm. Cereal Chemistry 76, 375–379.Google Scholar
Peng, M., Hucl, P. & Chibbar, R. N. (2001). Isolation, characterization and expression analysis of starch synthase I from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Science 161, 1055–1062.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. G. & Fulcher, R. G. (2001). Variation in Minnesota HRS wheats: starch granule size distribution. Food Research International 34, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlström, S., Baevre, A. B. & Brathen, E. (2003). Impact of starch properties on hearth bread characteristics. II. Purified A- and B-granule fractions. Journal of Cereal Science 37, 285–293.Google Scholar
Sahlström, S., Brathen, E., Lea, P. & Autio, K. (1998). Influence of starch granule size distribution on bread characteristics. Journal of Cereal Science 28, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Singh, G., Singh, P. & Singh, N. (2008). Effect of water stress at different stages of grain development on the characteristics of starch and protein of different wheat varieties. Food Chemistry 108, 130–139.Google Scholar
Soh, H. N., Sissons, M. J. & Turner, M. A. (2006). Effect of starch granule size distribution and elevated amylose content on durum dough rheology and spaghetti cooking quality. Cereal Chemistry 83, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulaka, A. B. & Morrison, W. R. (1985). The amylose and lipid contents, dimensions, and gelatinisation characteristics of some wheat starches and their A- and B-granule fractions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 709–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topin, V., Radjai, F., Delenne, J.-Y., Sadoudi, A. & Mabille, F. (2008). Wheat endosperm as a cohesive granular material. Journal of Cereal Science 47, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeylen, R., Goderis, B., Reynaers, H. & Delcour, J. A. (2005). Gelatinisation related structural aspects of small and large wheat starch granules. Carbohydrate Polymers 62, 170–181.Google Scholar
Wang, C. Y., Ma, D. Y., Zhu, Y. J., Guo, T. C., Feng, W. & Zhou, S. M. (2004). Effects of different irrigation and nitrogen application regimes in winter wheat on cooking qualities of Chinese noodle. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 7, 256–262.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. D. (2003). Measuring wheat starch size distribution using image analysis and laser diffraction technology; quality of spelt wheat and its starch. Ph.D. thesis, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. D., Bechtel, D. B., Todd, T. C. & Seib, P. A. (2006). Measurement of wheat starch granule size distribution using image analysis and laser diffraction technology. Cereal Chemistry 83, 259–268.Google Scholar
Yu, S. L. (1990). Wheat in Shandong Province. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Zeng, M., Morris, C. F., Batey, I. L. & Wrigley, C. W. (1997). Sources of variation for starch gelatinization, pasting, and gelation properties of wheat. Cereal Chemistry 74, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Dai, T., Jiang, D. & Cao, W. (2008). Effects of high temperature on key enzymes involved in starch and protein formation in grains of two wheat cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194, 47–54.Google Scholar