Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T16:53:40.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on factors affecting myoglobin concentrations in muscle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. A. Lawrie
R. A. Lawrie
Affiliation:
Low Temperature Station for Research in Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Cambridge, and Department of Scientific and Indwtrial Research
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The myoglobin contents of selected muscles in horse, pig, domestic fowl and pigeon, and in the foetuses of horse, pig, sheep and cattle, have been determined.

2. The order of increasing concentration of myoglobin in the adult animal (4 years) is given by the series heart, longissimus dorsi, diaphragm and psoas, the figures for draught horse being, respectively, 0·325, 0·465, 0·610 and 0·705% and for pig, 0·203, 0·280, 0·350 and 0·435%, and the ratios of these concentrations being the same in each animal.

3. In both draught horse and pig, it is shown that the concentration of the pigment rises rapidly from birth, and that, after 2 years in the horse, and 1 year in the pig, it remains fairly constant, except in the case of horse psoas and diaphragm where there is a slow, but significant, rise throughout life.

4. This relationship of myoglobin with age has been shown to be significant at a probability level of 0·1%.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 1950 , pp. 356 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, L. M. N. (1948). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 67, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate-Smith, E. C. (1942). Chem. Ind. 61, 373.Google Scholar
Bate-Smith, E. C. (1948 a). Adv. in Food Research, 1, 16. New York: Acad. Press.Google Scholar
Bate-Smith, E. C. (1948 b). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Land., 67, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biörck, G. (1949). Acta med. Scand. 133, Suppl. 226.Google Scholar
Case, R. A. M. (1950). Spec. Rep. Food Invest. Bd., Land. In preparation.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. N. & King, E. J. (1942). Brit. Med. J. 2, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, M. W. & Drabkin, D. L. (1946). J. Biol. Chem. 166, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabkin, D. L. (1950). J. Biol. Chem. 182, 1, 317.Google Scholar
de Duve, C. (1948). Acta chem. Scand. 2, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, H. (1921). Virchows Arch. 230, 159.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep, pp. 484, 498, 504. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1925). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 98, 312.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. P. & Whipple, G. H. (1928–1929). Amer. J. Physiol. 87, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kölliker, A. (1850). Mikroskopische Anat. 2, 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kuhne, W. (1865). Virchows Arch. 33, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, (ii) 328, (iii) 387.Google Scholar
Marsh, B. B. & Snow, A. (1950). J. Sci. Food Agric., Land., 1, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, G. A. (1936). J. Physiol. 87, 38P.Google Scholar
Millikan, G. A. (1939). Physiol. Rev. 19, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, V. E. (1935). J. Biol. Chem. 112, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mörner, K. A. H. (1897). Nord. med. Ark. 30, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Needham, D. M. (1926). Physiol. Rev. 6, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poel, W. E. (1949). Amer. J. Physiol. 156, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. (1939). Science, 90, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenk, J. H., Hall, J. L. & King, H. H. (1934). J. Biol. Chem. 105, 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, S. (1927). Anatomy of Domestic Animals, 2nd ed.London: W. B. Saunders and Co.Google Scholar
Theorell, H. (1932). Biochem. Z. 252, 1.Google Scholar
Theorell, H. (1934). Biochem. Z. 268, 46–82.Google Scholar
Walley, J. K. (1950). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Watson, R. H. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, G. H. (1926). Amer. J. Physiol. 76, 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, G. H., Groth, A. H. & Robscheit-Robbins, . (1928–1929). Amer. J. Physiol. 87, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H. (1922). J. Biochem., Tokio, cited by Peters, J. P. & Van Slyke, D. D. (1932) in Quantitative Clinical Chemistry, 2, 668. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar