Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:25:38.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of differing times of seedling emergence, population density and seed size on root-size variation in carrot populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. R. Benjamin
L. R. Benjamin
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, GVS5 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In three experiments the effects of population density, spread in time of seedling emergence and variation in seed size on carrot plant-to-plant root-size variation were investigated.

In the first experiment, coefficient of variation, c.v., of root dry weight was only 27–33% when using uniform growing conditions, graded seed, low population density and synchronous seedling emergence (i.e. over 3–11 days). Allowing asynchronous emergence (i.e. over 8–21 days) increased the c.v. to 32–37%, whereas increasing population density from 25 to 400 plants/m2, but maintaining synchronous seedling emergence, produced a c.v. of 57–73%. Asynchronous emergence combined with high population density increased the c.v. even further to 79–97%. Spread in time of emergence was associated with 5–48% of the plant-to-plant root-size variation. Thus asynchrony of seedling emergence was a source of plant-to-plant root-size variation and this effect was magnified by high population density, but other sources of variation were also important. Statistical analysis showed that the effects of these other sources of root-size variation were no greater in populations where emergence had occurred over only 3 or 4 days than in those where emergence had occurred over 3 weeks.

There was no effect on root-size frequency distribution in a second experiment in which the spread of seedling emergence was truncated from 19 to 14 days by spraying paraquat onto the first seedlings to emerge from field plots.

In a third experiment seeds 1·6–2·0 or 1·0–1·25 mm in diameter were grown in pure or mixed populations under conditions similar to those of the synchronous emergence high-density treatment of Expt 1. Storage roots derived from the large seeds weighed 38% more than those derived from the small seeds. Thus differences in seed size caused some of the root-size variation not already linked with different seedling emergence times. However, the c.v. of root dry weight from all the plants in mixed seed population was not greater than the c.v.s of root dry weight of either of the pure seed populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 537 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, R. B. & Longden, P. C. (1967). Some effects of seed size and maturity on the yield of carrot crops. Journal of Horticultural Science 42, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, A. (1981). Studies of variability estimates. National Vegetable Research Station Annual Report for 1980, pp. 135–136.Google Scholar
Black, J. N. (1958). Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover with particular reference to leaf area and microclimate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, P. M., Eckersall, R. N. & Scott, R. K. (1963). The relative importance of embryo size and endosperm size in causing the effects associated with seed size in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gledhill, H. J. V. (1970). A study of factors influencing root size in carrot crops. M.Sc. thesis, University of Dundee.Google Scholar
Gray, D. & Steckel, J. K. A. (1980). Studies on the sources of variation in plant weight in Daucus carota (carrot) and the implications for seed production techniques. In Seed Production (ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D.). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, A. D. & McFadden, A. D. (1960). The competitive interaction between barley plants grown from large and small seeds. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 40, 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyama, H. & Kira, T. (1950). Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VIII. Frequency distribution of individual plant weight as affected by the interaction between plants. Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University, Series D7, 73–94.Google Scholar
Lang, R. W. & Holmes, J. C. (1964). The growth of the swede crop in relation to seed size. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 63, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, L. K. & McGillivbay, J. M. (1949). Some factors affecting the size of carrot roots. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 54, 311–318.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J., Currah, I. E. & Fellows, J. R. (1981). Studies on some sources of variation in carrot root weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, W. R. (1965). The effect of density on the performance of individual plants in subterranean clover swards. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar