Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:52:12.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some consequences of imposing different continuousgrazing pressures in the spring on tiller demography and leaf growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. B. Tallowin ,
J. H. H. Williams  and
F. W. Kirkham
J. R. B. Tallowin
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB
J. H. H. Williams
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB
F. W. Kirkham
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of different severities of continuous grazing imposed during the spring, followed by a uniform continuous grazing management from mid-summer onwards, were examined in relation to changes in tiller demography and leaf growth of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Two grazing severities were imposed, based upon maintaining a constant sward height of either 35 mm (severe) or 75 mm (lenient). From 1 June onwards, a uniform grazing pressure with a sward height of 60 mm was imposed.

Differences in the age class structure of the tiller populations developed during the spring between the two grazing treatments, principally through the suppression of daughter tiller development under the more lenient grazing. The demographic differences between the treatments were further increased during the remainder of the grazing season, under the common grazing management, largely because of the greater production of secondary daughter tillers in the sward which had been leniently grazed. The demographic differences between the swards had little effect on net pasture production during the treatment season, with lamina growth rates being virtually unaffected across a wide range of steadystate, continuous-grazing pressures. However, longer-term effects on pasture development, due to the demographic differences between the swards, did appear in the following season; the more severe grazing pressure treatment resulted in earlier inflorescence development in the subsequent season.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 112 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 115 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1976). The Grassmeter. Report of the Breeding and Production Organization, No. 26. 1975/6. Thames Ditton, Surrey: Milk Marketing Board.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. & Hodgson, J. (1983). The influence of sward conditions on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards under continuous stocking management. Grass and Forage Science 38, 323–331.Google Scholar
Garwood, E. A. (1969). Seasonal tiller populations of grass and grass-clover swards with and without irrigation. Journal of the British Grassland Society 24, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, S. A., Barthram, G. T. & Torvell, L. (1981). Components of regrowth in grazed and cut Lolium perenne swards. Grass and Forage Science 36, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, S. A., Barthram, G. T., Torvell, L., King, J. & Smith, H. K. (1983). Sward management, lamina turnover and tiller population density in continuously-stocked Lolium peremie-dominated swards. Grass and Forage Science 38, 333–344.Google Scholar
Hill, M. J. & Watkin, B. R. (1975). Seed production studies on perennial ryegrass, timothy and prairie grass. I. Effect of tiller age on tiller survival, ear-emergence and seedhead components. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 63–71.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Bircham, J. S., Grant, S. A. & King, J. (1981). The influence of cutting and grazing management on herbage growth and utilization. In Plant Physiology and Herbage Production, Occasional Symposium, British Grassland Society No. 13 (ed. Wright, C. E.), pp. 51–62.Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. (1974). The Massey Grassmeter. Dairy Farming Annual, pp. 26–30. Massey University.Google Scholar
Jones, M. B., Leafe, E. L. & Stiles, W. (1980). Water stress in field-grown perennial ryegrass. I. Its effect on growth, canopy photosynthesis and transpiration. Annals of Applied Biology 96, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. & Lambert, D. A. (1959). Ear-bearing capacity of tillers arising at different times in herbage grasses grown for seed. Journal of the British Grassland Society 14, 137–140.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. J., Leafe, E. L., Collett, B. & Stiles, W. (1983). The physiology of grass production under grazing. I. Characteristics of leaf and canopy photosynthesis of continuously-grazed swards. Journal of Applied Ecology 20, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. & Diekmahns, E. C. (ed.) (1972). Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture, CAB Bulletin No. 49. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Tallowin, J. R. B., Williams, J. H. H. & Large, R. V. (1986). Some consequences of imposing different continuous grazing pressures in the spring on sward morphology, herbage quality and the performance of young beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar