Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:56:47.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some causes of yield variation in an intensive spring barley experiment at Woburn, 1972–8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Hornby ,
D. R. Henden  and
J. A. Catt
D. Hornby
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
D. R. Henden
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
J. A. Catt
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An experiment with two blocks containing phased sequences of continuous spring barley after beans or fallow was located on sandy soil over Lower Greensand on a gentle north to south (N–S) slope at Woburn Farm. Season had the greatest effect on yield with a 135% difference between the worst (1975, 1·73 t/ha) and the best (1974, 4·06 t/ha). years. N–S position was the next most important factor with average differences of 65 and 52% between the plots at the top and bottom of the site in blocks I and II respectively. The third most important factor was E–W position which gave a maximum difference of 35% in 1975.

A fertility trend with a strong linear component, which was most conspicuous in drier years, followed the main slope of the experiment and was attributed to erosion (fieldwash). After 1972 as different cropping sequences were progressively introduced, yield variation due to crop sequence differences was confounded with this positional effect.

Crops in the eastern block were taller by l·5–12·3% and, after adjustment for the linear trend, yield was on average 15·6% greater than in the western block. The site is astride a N–S soil boundary with Stackyard series to the east and Cottenham series to the west. The Stackyard soil has a greater available water capacity, and is subject to drought less frequently than the Cottenham soil. Using Penman's (1971) data for the Cottenham series at Woburn and estimates of profile available water for the two series elsewhere on the farm, theoretical yields were derived, which were generally greater than actual yields adjusted for the N–S linear trend (block means 1·47–4·32 t/ha), but which showed similar trends in the between-block differences. Explanations for discrepancies between theoretical and actual yields are discussed. The incidence and severity of take-all disease and differences in soil pH were always small and unlikely to have caused significant yield variations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 175 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, B. W. (1980). Soil classification for England and Wales (higher categories). Soil Survey Technical Monograph 14, 67 pp.Google Scholar
Berkson, J. (1953). A statistically precise and relatively simple method of estimating the bioassay with quantal response, based on the logistic function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 48, 565–599.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., King, D. W. & Weir, A. H. (1975). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. I. Great Hill, Road Piece and Butt Close. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1974, part 2, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., Weir, A. H., Norrish, R. E., Rayner, J. H., King, D. W., Hall, D. G. M. & Murphy, C. P. (1980). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. III. Stackyard. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979, part 2, pp. 5–39.Google Scholar
Cox, J. (1965). Continuous wheat growing and the decline of take-all. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1964, pp. 133–134.Google Scholar
French, B. K. & Legg, B. J. (1979). Rothamsted irrigation 1964–76. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. G. M., Reeve, M. J., Thomasson, A. J. & Wright, V. F. (1977). Water retention, porosity and density of field soils. Soil Survey Technical Monograph 9, 75 pp.Google Scholar
Hollis, J. M., Jones, R. J. A. & Palmer, R. C. (1977). The effects of organic matter and particle size on the water-retention properties of some soils in the West Midlands of England. Geoderma 17, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, D. (1969). Quantitative estimation of soilborne inoculum of the take-all fungus (Ophiobolus graminis (Sacc.) Sacc). Proceedings of the 5th British Insecticides and Fungicides Conference, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
Hornby, D. (1975). Inoculum of the take-all fungus: nature, measurement, distribution and survival. EPPO Bulletin 5, 319–333.Google Scholar
Hornby, D. & Brown, M. E. (1977). Nitrate and ammonium in the rhizosphere of wheat crops and concurrent observations of take-all. Plant and Soil 48, 455–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, D. & Goring, C. A. I. (1972). Effects of ammonium and nitrate nutrition on take-all disease of wheat in pots. Annals of Applied Biology 70, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, D., Henden, D. R. & Catt, J. A. (1978). The effect of breaks on take-all experiment at Woburn. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1977, part 1, pp. 216–217.Google Scholar
Hornby, D., Henden, D. R. & den Toom, A. (1979). Gaeumannomyces-Phialophora complex: isolates from a site with little take-all. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1978, part 1, pp. 213–214.Google Scholar
Kalembasa, S. J. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1973). A comparative study of titrimetric and gravimetric methods for the determination of organic carbon in soil Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 24, 1085–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1954). Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Peekes Scale. Plant Pathology 3, 128–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1978). The control of environmental variation in some West Indian maize experiments. Tropical Agriculture 55, 97–106.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1971). Irrigation at Woburn. VII. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1970, Part 2, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. H., Sale, R. D. & Morrison, J. L. (1978). Elements of Cartography, 4th edn.New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J., Berry, G. & Williams, J. B. (1966). The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils. III. Quantitative relationships between particle size, composition, and available water capacity. Journal of Soil Science 17, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slope, D. B. & Cox, J. (1964). Continuous wheat growing and the decline of take-all. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1963, p. 108.Google Scholar